Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma: a retrospective analysis of 61,389 in- and out-patients

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To calculate the prevalence, localization, and growth of sporadic angiomyolipomas and to identify the predominant sex in the largest patient population reviewed to date.

Methods

Abdominal ultrasound analyses of 61,389 patients (49.7% women; 50.3% men) were consecutively collected using a PC-based, standardized documentation system from September 1999 to December 2012. The present study evaluates and presents this data.

Results

The population studied includes 270 cases of sporadic angiomyolipoma (184 females; 86 males). This represents an overall prevalence of 0.44%, with 0.60% in the female and 0.28% in the male subpopulations. Mean tumor size was 10.8 ± 5.8 mm. Fifty-seven percent of cases involved the right kidney and 43.0% the left kidney. Only 14 of the 270 patients presented with multiple angiomyolipomas, four of which were bilateral. Sixty-one cases were followed over a mean period of 25 months (range: 1–105 months) and showed no significant increase in tumor size during the period of observation.

Conclusion

The analysis of 61,389 patients revealed a higher prevalence of sporadic angiomyolipoma than previously observed in smaller studies. There was a significantly higher prevalence in females than in males. Multiple and bilateral angiomyolipomas were rare, and tumor growth was marginal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kutikov A, Fossett LK, Ramchandani P, et al. (2006) Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology 68:737–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Snyder ME, Bach A, Kattan MW, et al. (2006) Incidence of benign lesions for clinically localized renal masses smaller than 7 cm in radiological diameter: influence of sex. J Urol 176:2391–2395 (discussion 2395–2396).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson CP, Sanda MG (2002) Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol 168:1315–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Halpenny D, Snow A, McNeill G, Torreggiani WC (2010) The radiological diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma-current status. Clin Radiol 65:99–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujii Y, Ajima J, Oka K, Tosaka A, Takehara Y (1995) Benign renal tumors detected among healthy adults by abdominal ultrasonography. Eur Urol 27:124–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hajdu SI, Foote FW Jr (1969) Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: report of 27 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 102:396–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Luca S, Terrone C, Rossetti SR (1999) Management of renal angiomyolipoma: a report of 53 cases. BJU Int 83:215–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemaitre L, Claudon M, Dubrulle F, Mazeman E (1997) Imaging of angiomyolipomas. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 18:100–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mues AC, Palacios JM, Haramis G, et al. (2010) Contemporary experience in the management of angiomyolipoma. J Endourol 24:1883–1886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oesterling JE, Fishman EK, Goldman SM, Marshall FF (1986) The management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol 135:1121–1124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Steiner MS, Goldman SM, Fishman EK, Marshall FF (1993) The natural history of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol 150:1782–1786

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamakado K, Tanaka N, Nakagawa T, et al. (2002) Renal angiomyolipoma: relationships between tumor size, aneurysm formation, and rupture. Radiology 225:78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Akita H, et al. (2014) Renal angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in diagnosis and management. Abdom Imaging. doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0083-3

  14. Jinzaki M, Ohkuma K, Tanimoto A, et al. (1998) Small solid renal lesions: usefulness of power Doppler US. Radiology 209:543–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lane BR, Aydin H, Danforth TL, et al. (2008) Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid. J Urol 180:836–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boorjian SA, Sheinin Y, Crispen PL, et al. (2008) Hormone receptor expression in renal angiomyolipoma: clinicopathologic correlation. Urology 72:927–932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Henske EP, Ao X, Short MP, et al. (1998) Frequent progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in tuberous sclerosis-associated renal angiomyolipomas. Mod Pathol 11:665–668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nofech-Mozes S, Vella ET, Dhesy-Thind S, et al. (2012) Systematic review on hormone receptor testing in breast cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 20:214–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Renoir JM, Marsaud V, Lazennec G (2013) Estrogen receptor signaling as a target for novel breast cancer therapeutics. Biochem Pharmacol 85:449–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zapardiel I, Delafuente-Valero J, Bajo-Arenas JM (2011) Renal angiomyolipoma during pregnancy: review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest 72:217–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gould Rothberg BE, Grooms MC, Dharnidharka VR (2006) Rapid growth of a kidney angiomyolipoma after initiation of oral contraceptive therapy. Obstet Gynecol 108:734–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torella M, La Rezza F, Labriola D, et al. (2013) Phytoestrogens and menopause. Minerva Ginecol 65:679–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hobarth K, Klingler HC, Kuber W, Kratzik C (1993) Value of routine sonography in the diagnosis and conservative management of renal angiomyolipoma. Eur Urol 24:239–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ouzaid I, Autorino R, Fatica R, et al. (2013) Active surveillance for renal angiomyolipoma: outcomes and predictive factors of delayed intervention. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/bju.12604

  25. Charboneau JW, Hattery RR 3rd, Ernst EC, et al. (1983) Spectrum of sonographic findings in 125 renal masses other than benign simple cyst. AJR Am J Roentgenol 140:87–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldman SM (1989) Benign renal tumors: diagnosis and treatment. Urol Radiol 11:203–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jinzaki M, Tanimoto A, Narimatsu Y, et al. (1997) Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat. Radiology 205:497–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim JY, Kim JK, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging. Radiology 246:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Kratzer.

Additional information

Astrid Fittschen and Inka Wendlik contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fittschen, A., Wendlik, I., Oeztuerk, S. et al. Prevalence of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma: a retrospective analysis of 61,389 in- and out-patients. Abdom Imaging 39, 1009–1013 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0129-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0129-6

Keywords

Navigation