Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imaging of acute pancreatitis requires not only an understanding of the disease subtypes and the myriad of associated complications but also familiarity with the appropriate radiologic nomenclature as defined by the Atlanta symposium in 1992 and, more recently, by the Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group in 2008. The accurate description of the radiological findings plays a critical role in the evaluation and management of patients with acute pancreatitis, particularly those with severe disease. There have been increasing efforts to develop uniformity in the use of terminology used to define the radiologic findings in acute pancreatitis, in particular, the terminology for fluid collections, a common area of inconsistency and confusion. Terms such as “acute peripancreatic fluid collections,” “acute post- necrotic fluid collections,” “pseudocyst,” and “walled-off pancreatic necrosis” are now recommended as they describe the evolution of fluid collections in patients with both interstitial and necrotizing pancreatitis and nonspecific terms such as “pancreatic abscess” and “phlegmon” are being abandoned. In this review we illustrate, with case examples, the standardized terminology used in the radiological and clinical description of acute pancreatitis, its severity, and complications with an emphasis on the role of ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Different management options of the associated complications are also discussed. The use of standardized terminology will hopefully improve the communication between radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons to facilitate treatment planning and will lead to enhanced outcomes for patients with acute pancreatitis as well as create uniformity for enrollment into research studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandler RS, et al. (2002) The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 122(5):1500–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fagenholz PJ, et al. (2007) Direct medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations in the United States. Pancreas 35(4):302–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mofidi R, et al. (2006) Association between early systemic inflammatory response, severity of multiorgan dysfunction and death in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 93(6):738–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Werner J, et al. (2005) Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 54(3):426–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagar AB, Gorelick F (2005) Epidemiology and pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis. In: Forsmark CE (ed) Pancreatitis and its complications. Totowa: Humana, pp 3–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Isenmann R, Rau B, Beger HG (1999) Bacterial infection and extent of necrosis are determinants of organ failure in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 86(8):1020–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh VK, et al. (2011) An assessment of the severity of interstitial pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(12):1098–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollen TL, et al. (2008) The Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg 95(1):6–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group (2008) Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. http://www.pancreasclub.com/resources/AtlantaClassification.pdf

  12. Bradley EL, Gonzalez AC, Clements JL Jr (1976) Acute pancreatic pseudocysts: incidence and implications. Ann Surg 184(6):734–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson CD (1993) Timing of intervention in acute pancreatitis. Postgrad Med J 69(813):509–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siegelman SS, et al. (1980) CT of fluid collections associated with pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 134(6):1121–1132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193(2):297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baillie J (2004) Pancreatic pseudocysts (part I). Gastrointest Endosc 59(7):873–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Maher MM, et al. (2004) Acute pancreatitis: the role of imaging and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27(3):208–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beebe DS, et al. (1984) Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159(6):562–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Malley VP, Cannon JP, Postier RG (1985) Pancreatic pseudocysts: cause, therapy, and results. Am J Surg 150(6):680–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeo CJ, et al. (1990) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170(5):411–417

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vitas GJ, Sarr MG (1992) Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 111(2):123–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stephan RN, Bradley EL 3rd (1996) Pancreatic infections. Gastroenterologist 4(3):163–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Behrns KE, Ben-David K (2008) Surgical therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Gastrointest Surg 12(12):2231–2239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brugge WR (2004) Approaches to the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 20(5):488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nealon WH, Walser E (2002) Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage). Ann Surg 235(6):751–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nealon WH, Walser E (2005) Surgical management of complications associated with percutaneous and/or endoscopic management of pseudocyst of the pancreas. Ann Surg 241(6):948–957 (discussion 957–60)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hanna WA (1960) Rupture of pancreatic cysts. Report of a case and review of the literature. Br J Surg 47:495–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. White AF, Baum S, Buranasiri S (1976) Aneurysms secondary to pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 127(3):393–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Adams DB, Zellner JL, Anderson MC (1993) Arterial hemorrhage complicating pancreatic pseudocysts: role of angiography. J Surg Res 54(2):150–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. De Sanctis JT, et al. (1997) Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs APACHE II. Clin Radiol 52(11):842–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beger HG, et al. (1985) Results of surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. World J Surg 9(6):972–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moulton JS (1991) The radiologic assessment of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Pancreas 6(Suppl 1):S13–S22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lankisch PG, Haseloff M, Becher R (1994) No parallel between the biochemical course of acute pancreatitis and morphologic findings. Pancreas 9(2):240–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Buter A, et al. (2002) Dynamic nature of early organ dysfunction determines outcome in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 89(3):298–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tenner S, et al. (1997) Relationship of necrosis to organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 113(3):899–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakorafas GH, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG (1999) Extrapancreatic necrotizing pancreatitis with viable pancreas: a previously under-appreciated entity. J Am Coll Surg 188(6):643–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bruennler T, et al. (2009) Outcome in a large unselected series of patients with acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(91–92):871–876

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lankisch PG, Struckmann K, Lehnick D (1999) Presence and extent of extrapancreatic fluid collections are indicators of severe acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 26(3):131–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Garg PK, et al. (2005) Association of extent and infection of pancreatic necrosis with organ failure and death in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(2):159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mole DJ, et al. (2009) Discrepancy between the extent of pancreatic necrosis and multiple organ failure score in severe acute pancreatitis. World J Surg 33(11):2427–2432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lankisch PG, Pflichthofer D, Lehnick D (2000) No strict correlation between necrosis and organ failure in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 20(3):319–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Perez A, et al. (2002) Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis? Pancreas 25(3):229–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bai Y, et al. (2008) Prophylactic antibiotics cannot reduce infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 103(1):104–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Villatoro E, Mulla M, Larvin M (2010) Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(5):CD002941

    Google Scholar 

  45. Balthazar EJ, et al. (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Larvin M, Chalmers AG, McMahon MJ (1990) Dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography: a precise technique for identifying and localising pancreatic necrosis. BMJ 300(6737):1425–1428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Sarr MG (1991) CT of acute pancreatitis: correlation between lack of contrast enhancement and pancreatic necrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156(1):93–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sainio VS, et al. (1997) Incorrect estimation of severity of acute pancreatitis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86(3):214–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Freeny PC (1993) Incremental dynamic bolus computed tomography of acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 13(3):147–158

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Arvanitakis M, et al. (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126(3):715–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hariri M, et al. (1994) Pseudocyst drainage predisposes to infection when pancreatic necrosis is unrecognized. Am J Gastroenterol 89(10):1781–1784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Banks PA, Gerzof SG, Sullivan JG (1988) Central cavitary necrosis: differentiation from pancreatic pseudocyst on CT scan. Pancreas 3(1):83–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kemppainen E, et al. (1996) Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 83(7):924–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Tann M, et al. (2003) Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: imaging findings and therapeutic implications in 26 surgically corrected patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(4):577–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sandrasegaran K, et al. (2007) Disconnection of the pancreatic duct: an important but overlooked complication of severe acute pancreatitis. Radiographics 27(5):1389–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Freeny PC, et al. (1998) Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(4):969–975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Howard TJ, et al. (2001) Roux-en-Y internal drainage is the best surgical option to treat patients with disconnected duct syndrome after severe acute pancreatitis. Surgery 130(4):714–719 (discussion 719–21)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Amano Y, et al. (2001) Nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of mild acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 26(1):59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Stimac D, et al. (2007) The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 102(5):997–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hirota M, et al. (2002) Visualization of the heterogeneous internal structure of so-called “pancreatic necrosis” by magnetic resonance imaging in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 25(1):63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Morgan DE, et al. (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203(3):773–778

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Gardner TB, et al. (2011) Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter US series. Gastrointest Endosc 73(4):718–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM (2011) Endoscopic placement of permanent indwelling transmural stents in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: does benefit outweigh the risks? Gastrointest Endosc 74(6):1408–1412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Belle S, et al. (2010) Temporary cystogastrostomy with self-expanding metallic stents for pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopy 42(6):493–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Gluck M, et al. (2012) Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):248–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gluck M, et al. (2010) Endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces hospital stay and radiographic resources. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8(12):1083–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hellerhoff KJ, et al. (2002) Dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin administration: image quality and diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):121–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Manfredi R, et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance pancreatography (MRP): morphology and function. Rays 26(2):127–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Gillams AR, Kurzawinski T, Lees WR (2006) Diagnosis of duct disruption and assessment of pancreatic leak with dynamic secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(2):499–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Acute Pancreatitis. American College of Radiology: Appropriateness Criteria 1998, updated 2010. Available from: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonGastrointestinalImaging/acutepancreatitisDoc2.aspx. Accessed 2012

  72. Mortele KJ, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bollen TL, et al. (2011) Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(2):386–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bollen TL, et al. (2011) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Horton KM, Fishman EK (2010) CT angiography of the mesenteric circulation. Radiol Clin North Am 48(2):331–345, viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Shinya S, et al. (2009) The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection and evaluation of acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(94–95):1407–1410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Thomas S, et al. (2012) Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values. Emerg Radiol 19(1):5–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atif Zaheer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaheer, A., Singh, V.K., Qureshi, R.O. et al. The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines. Abdom Imaging 38, 125–136 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9908-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9908-0

Keywords

Navigation