Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patterns of shift in ADC distributions in abdominal tumours during chemotherapy—feasibility study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) relates to tissue cellularity, and change in ADC during chemotherapy may be a promising tool for assessing oncological response.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of measuring changes in ADC distribution in solid abdominal and pelvic paediatric tumours during chemotherapy, and to assess patterns of change.

Materials and methods

Consecutive children were included in a prospective observational study. ADC maps were calculated at presentation and following chemotherapy from a diffusion-sensitised sequence. ADC distribution in the whole tumour, excluding areas of low or absent gadolinium-enhancement, was investigated. Change during chemotherapy was assessed for each patient individually. Histopathological slices from the resected specimens were reviewed.

Results

There were seven children (nine tumours) included in the study. ADC in all except one deviated from a normal distribution. All tumours changed their ADC distribution during chemotherapy. Median ADC increased in all upper abdominal tumours, but more in tumours with histopathologically good or marked response to chemotherapy. Seven out of nine tumours attained a wider ADC distribution, the remaining two showed little chemotherapy response.

Conclusion

ADC distribution changes during chemotherapy in childhood abdominal tumours are measurable. Distinct patterns of shift can be observed and ADC change is therefore promising as a noninvasive biomarker for therapy response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gow KW, Roberts IF, Jamieson DH et al (2000) Local staging of Wilms’ tumor–computerized tomography correlation with histological findings. J Pediatr Surg 35:677–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen ØE, Jeanes AC, Sebire NJ et al (2004) Changes in computed tomography features following preoperative chemotherapy for nephroblastoma: relation to histopathological classification. Eur Radiol 14:990–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Humphries PD, Sebire NJ, Siegel MJ et al (2007) Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity. Radiology 245:848–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sury MR, Smith JH (2008) Deep sedation and minimal anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 18:18–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M et al (2006) Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 24:843–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uhl M, Saueressig U, Koehler G et al (2006) Evaluation of tumour necrosis during chemotherapy with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: preliminary results in osteosarcomas. Pediatr Radiol 36:1306–1311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vujanic GM, Sandstedt B, Harms D et al (2002) Revised International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) working classification of renal tumors of childhood. Med Pediatr Oncol 38:79–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson J, Slater O, McHugh K et al (2002) Response without shrinkage in bilateral Wilms tumor: significance of rhabdomyomatous histology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Øystein E. Olsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonald, K., Sebire, N.J., Anderson, J. et al. Patterns of shift in ADC distributions in abdominal tumours during chemotherapy—feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 41, 99–106 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1741-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1741-4

Keywords

Navigation