Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Smartphone apps for urolithiasis

  • Review
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are an increasing number of healthcare smartphone applications (‘apps’) available. Urolithiasis presents a major healthcare burden. Patients are increasingly keen to educate themselves regarding the diagnosis and management of their condition. There is no formal regulation of healthcare apps, including a large number of apps relating to urolithiasis. This review aims to examine the range of apps available, and the prevalence of healthcare professional input. Four international smartphone app stores were searched: Apple’s App Store, Google Play (Android), BlackBerry App World and the Windows Phone App store. A total of 42 unique apps were downloaded and analysed. Recorded data included the cost (£/$), publisher information, number of ratings, average rating and any documentation of medical professional involvement. Twenty-one (50 %) apps required payment for download. The mean cost was £3.58 ($6.04) with range £0.61–£34.90 ($1.03–$58.87). Thirty-three (79 %) of the 42 apps were designed to be used by patients. Fifteen (36 %) of the 42 apps had clear input from health professionals. Twenty-two apps offered patient information, including dietary advice on lowering calcium intake, which is contrary to current evidence-based practice. We conclude that urolithiasis apps have future potential to inform both patients and healthcare professionals on stone management. However, inaccuracies in the recommendations made by some apps can be misleading or even harmful due to a lack of specialist involvement. We recommend improving the usefulness of these apps by seeking a ‘quality stamp’ from recognised urological organisations and greater clinician involvement in future app development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franko OI (2011) Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(7):2042–2048. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1904-0

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith A. Smartphone ownership —2013 update. Pew Research Centre Reports. 2013 June. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Smartphone_adoption_2013.pdf. Accessed 09 Oct 2013

  3. Makanjuola JK, Rao AR, Hale J, Bultitude M, Challacombe B, Dasgupta P (2012) Urology apps: a review of all apps available for urologists. BJU Int 110(4):475–477. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11200.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D4(2007) A survey of mobile phone usage by health professionals in the UK. http://www.d4.org.uk/research/survey-mobile-phone-use-health-professionals-UK.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2012

  5. Dasari KB, White SM, Pateman J (2011) Survey of iPhone usage among anaesthetists in England. Anaesthesia 66(67):630–631. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06747.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kailas A, Chong CC, Watanabe F (2010) From mobile phones to personal wellness dashboards. IEEE Pulse 1(1):57–63. doi:10.1109/MPUL.2010.937244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barton AJ (2012) The regulation of mobile health applications. BMC Med 10:46. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-46

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox S, Duggan M (2012) Mobile health. Pew internet & american life project http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Mobile-Health.aspx. Accessed 9 Oct 2013

  9. Janhs RG (2010) research2guidance. http://www.research2guidance.com/500m-people-will-be-using-healthcare-mobile-applications-in-2015/. Accessed 14 Oct 2013

  10. Vos J, Parker C (2012) Medical device regulation: Health policy and position. GSMA connected living programme. http://www.gsma.com/connectedliving/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/gsmamedicaldeviceregulationmhealthpolicyandposition.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2013

  11. O’Neill S, Brady RR (2012) Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis 4(9):e530–e534. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03088.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freshwater MF (2011) iPhone and iPad applications for plastic surgeons. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(10):1397–1399. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens DJ, Jackson JA, Howes N (2014) Obesity surgery smartphone apps: a review. Obes Surg 24(1):32–36. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1010-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos D (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12:e86–e96

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stamatelou K, Francis M, Jones C, Nyberg L, Curhan G (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63:1817–1823. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR (2012) Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int 109(7):1082–1087. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10495.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallagher S, Tedstone Doherty D, Moran R, Kartalova-O’Doherty Y (2008) Internet use and seeking health information online in Ireland: demographic characteristics and mental health characteristics of users and non users. In: HRB Research Series 4, Health Research Board, Dublin

  18. Patel B (2013) Mobile medical applications—guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM263366.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2013

  19. Hamilton AD, Brady RR (2012) Medical professional involvement in smartphone ‘apps’ in dermatology. Br J Dermatol 167(1):220–221. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10844.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosser BA, Eccleston C (2011) Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare 17(6):308–312. doi:10.1258/jtt.2011.101102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. National Kidney and Urologic Diseases Information Clearinghouse (NKUDIC) (2013) Diet for Kidney Stone Prevention. US Department of Health and Human Services. http://kidney.niddk.nih.gov/Kudiseases/pubs/kidneystonediet/index.aspx. Accessed 18 Apr 2014

  22. Penniston K, Nakada S (2013) Development of an instrument to assess the health related quality of life of kidney stone formers. J Urol 189(3):921–930. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Stevens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stevens, D.J., McKenzie, K., Cui, H.W. et al. Smartphone apps for urolithiasis. Urolithiasis 43, 13–19 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0738-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0738-0

Keywords

Navigation