Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inhibition of bacterial degradation of EtG by collection as dried urine spots (DUS)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are direct alcohol consumption markers widely used nowadays for clinical and forensic applications. They are detectable in blood and urine even after consumption of trace amounts of ethanol and for a longer time frame, being detectable even when no more ethanol is present. The instability of EtG against bacterial degradation in contaminated urine samples and/or the possible postcollection synthesis of this metabolite in samples containing, e.g., Escherichia coli and ethanol, may cause false identification of alcohol uptake. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to constrict these error sources by inhibition of any bacterial growth causing hydrolization or synthesis of EtG. This study evaluates a new method of collecting urine samples on filter paper, dried urine spots (DUS), for simultaneous detection of EtG, EtS and creatinine, having the great advantage of inhibiting bacterial activity. In addition, a method validation for the determination of EtG and EtS in DUS was performed according to the FDA guidelines. Sterile-filtered urine was spiked with EtG and EtS, inoculated with E. coli and incubated. Liquid and dried urine samples were collected after various time intervals up to 96 h. Liquid samples were frozen immediately after collection, whereas aliquots for DUS were pipetted onto filter paper, allowed to dry and stored at RT until analysis 1 week after. The specimens were analyzed by LC–ESI–MS/MS. As expected, degradation of EtG, but not of EtS, was observed in contaminated liquid urine samples. However, the specimens collected on filter paper and stored at RT showed no degradation during storage. Therefore, collecting urine samples on filter paper for EtG and EtS analysis turns out to be a reliable method to avoid bacterial degradation of EtG and EtS, and consequently, stabilization of these ethanol metabolites is achieved. In addition, simultaneous measurement of creatinine content as an indicator of urine dilution helps to interpret the results. Method validation for EtG and EtS in DUS was satisfactory, showing the linearity of the calibration curves in the studied concentration range, good precision, accuracy and selectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones AW (1990) Excretion of alcohol in urine and diuresis in healthy men in relation to their age, the dose administered and the time after drinking. Forensic Sci Int 45(3):217–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstrom J, Helander A, Jones AW (2003) Ethyl glucuronide concentrations in two successive urinary voids from drinking drivers: relationship to creatinine content and blood and urine ethanol concentrations. Forensic Sci Int 133(1–2):86–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmitt G, Droenner P, Skopp G, Aderjan R (1997) Ethyl glucuronide concentration in serum of human volunteers, teetotalers, and suspected drinking drivers. J Forensic Sci 42(6):1099–1102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahl H, Stephanson N, Beck O, Helander A (2002) Comparison of urinary excretion characteristics of ethanol and ethyl glucuronide. J Anal Toxicol 26(4):201–204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Helander A (2003) Biological markers in alcoholism. J Neural Transm Suppl 66:15–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinmann W, Schaefer P, Thierauf A, Schreiber A, Wurst FM (2004) Confirmatory analysis of ethylglucuronide in urine by liquid-chromatography/electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry according to forensic guidelines. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 15(2):188–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seidl S, Wurst FM, Alt A (2001) Ethyl glucuronide—a biological marker for recent alcohol consumption. Addict Biol 6(3):205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Helander A, Beck O (2004) Mass spectrometric identification of ethyl sulfate as an ethanol metabolite in humans. Clin Chem 50(5):936–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dresen S, Weinmann W, Wurst FM (2004) Forensic confirmatory analysis of ethyl sulfate—a new marker for alcohol consumption—by liquid-chromatography/electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 15(11):1644–1648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Foti RS, Fisher MB (2005) Assessment of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase catalyzed formation of ethyl glucuronide in human liver microsomes and recombinant UGTs. Forensic Sci Int 153(2–3):109–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider H, Glatt H (2004) Sulpho-conjugation of ethanol in humans in vivo and by individual sulphotransferase forms in vitro. Biochem J 383(Pt. 3):543–549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephanson N, Dahl H, Helander A, Beck O (2002) Direct quantification of ethyl glucuronide in clinical urine samples by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Ther Drug Monit 24(5):645–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wurst FM, Dresen S, Allen JP, Wiesbeck G, Graf M, Weinmann W (2006) Ethyl sulphate: a direct ethanol metabolite reflecting recent alcohol consumption. Addiction 101(2):204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wurst FM, Kempter C, Seidl S, Alt A (1999) Ethyl glucuronide—a marker of alcohol consumption and a relapse marker with clinical and forensic implications. Alcohol Alcohol 34(1):71–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Helander A, Bottcher M, Fehr C, Dahmen N, Beck O (2009) Detection times for urinary ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in heavy drinkers during alcohol detoxification. Alcohol Alcohol 44(1):55–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thierauf A, Halter CC, Rana S, Auwaerter V, Wohlfarth A, Wurst FM, Weinmann W (2009) Urine tested positive for ethyl glucuronide after trace amounts of ethanol. Addiction 104(12):2007–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wurst FM, Skipper GE, Weinmann W (2003) Ethyl glucuronide—the direct ethanol metabolite on the threshold from science to routine use. Addiction 98(Suppl 2):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skipper GE, Weinmann W, Thierauf A, Schaefer P, Wiesbeck G, Allen JP, Miller M, Wurst FM (2004) Ethyl glucuronide: a biomarker to identify alcohol use by health professionals recovering from substance use disorders. Alcohol Alcohol 39(5):445–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wurst FM, Yegles M, Alling C, Aradottir S, Dierkes J, Wiesbeck GA, Halter CC, Pragst F, Auwaerter V (2008) Measurement of direct ethanol metabolites in a case of a former driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol offender, now claiming abstinence. Int J Legal Med 122(3):235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Helander A, Dahl H (2005) Urinary tract infection: a risk factor for false-negative urinary ethyl glucuronide but not ethyl sulfate in the detection of recent alcohol consumption. Clin Chem 51(9):1728–1730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baranowski S, Serr A, Thierauf A, Weinmann W, Grosse Perdekamp M, Wurst FM, Halter CC (2008) In vitro study of bacterial degradation of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate. Int J Legal Med 122(5):389–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Helander A, Olsson I, Dahl H (2007) Postcollection synthesis of ethyl glucuronide by bacteria in urine may cause false identification of alcohol consumption. Clin Chem 53(10):1855–1857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thierauf A, Serr A, Halter CC, Al-Ahmad A, Rana S, Weinmann W (2008) Influence of preservatives on the stability of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate in urine. Forensic Sci Int 182(1–3):41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufmann E, Alt A (2008) Detection of ethyl glucuronide in dried human blood using LC-MS/MS. Int J Legal Med 122(3):245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Winkler M, Kaufmann E, Thoma D, Thierauf A, Weinmann W, Skopp G, Alt A (2011) Detection of ethyl glucuronide in blood spotted on different surfaces. Forensic Sci Int 210(1–3):243–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Faller A, Richter B, Kluge M, Koenig P, Seitz HK, Thierauf A, Gnann H, Winkler M, Mattern R, Skopp G (2011) LC–MS/MS analysis of phosphatidylethanol in dried blood spots versus conventional blood specimens. Anal Bioanal Chem.

  27. Edelbroek PM, van der Heijden J, Stolk LM (2009) Dried blood spot methods in therapeutic drug monitoring: methods, assays, and pitfalls. Ther Drug Monit 31(3):327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McDade TW, Williams S, Snodgrass JJ (2007) What a drop can do: dried blood spots as a minimally invasive method for integrating biomarkers into population-based research. Demography 44(4):899–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alfazil AA, Anderson RA (2008) Stability of benzodiazepines and cocaine in blood spots stored on filter paper. J Anal Toxicol 32(7):511–515

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Skopp G, Potsch L (2001) Detection of cocaine in blood stains. Arch Kriminol 207(3–4):81–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation (2001) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA. Rockville, USA. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070107.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2011

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Swiss National Foundation for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Hernández Redondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernández Redondo, A., Körber, C., König, S. et al. Inhibition of bacterial degradation of EtG by collection as dried urine spots (DUS). Anal Bioanal Chem 402, 2417–2424 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5687-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5687-7

Keywords

Navigation