Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

There was 75% variation in the trend in hip fracture incidence with age in women aged 50 to 85 in France. In southwest France, the women are at higher risk of hip fracture at younger ages. This finding should be taken into account when examining risk factors.

Introduction

Few studies have analysed the geographical variations in the relationship between age and hip fracture incidence. Our goal was to assess these variations among women under 85 within the same country.

Methods

The study population included women aged 50 to 85 who were living in France in 2004. Hip fracture cases were identified in the French Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG)-like database using the diagnosis code for closed hip fractures and procedural codes for treatment. The Moran index and a spatial model using latitude and longitude were used to assess the geographical heterogeneities of cumulative incidence risk (CIR) and age effect.

Results

A total of 29,218 hip fracture cases were identified. A south-to-north CIR gradient ranging from 7 to 16% was observed. The variation in the number of years until double hip fracture incidence was 75% (i.e. 1.49 to 2.57 years). In the south, and more markedly in southwest France, the women are at higher risk of hip fracture at a younger age.

Conclusion

The risk of fracture may be different between women of the same age. This may be hidden in a comparison of standardised ratios. This finding should be considered when examining risk factors and implementing public health interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:897–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannus P, Sievanen H, Palvanen M, Jarvinen T, Parkkari J (2005) Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet 366:1885–1893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sambrook P, Cooper C (2006) Osteoporosis. Lancet 367:2010–2018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goettsch WG, de Jong RB, Kramarz P, Herings RM (2007) Developments of the incidence of osteoporosis in The Netherlands: a PHARMO study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16:166–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdani M et al (2005) Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong? J Bone Miner Res 20:898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Papadimitropoulos EA, Coyte PC, Josse RG, Greenwood CE (1997) Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ 157:1357–1363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Jarvinen M (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet 353:802–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lönnroos E, Kautiainen H, Karppi P et al (2006) Increased incidence of hip fractures. A population-based study in Finland. Bone 39:623–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baudoin C, Fardellone P, Thelot B et al (1996) Hip fractures in France: the magnitude and perspective of the problem. Osteoporos Int 6 [Suppl 3]:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elffors I, Allander E, Kanis JA et al (1994) The variable incidence of hip fracture in southern Europe: the MEDOS Study. Osteoporos Int 4:253–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ismail AA, Pye SR, Cockerill WC et al (2002) Incidence of limb fracture across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int 13:565–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnell O, Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Kanis J (2007) Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 18:333–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz AV, Kelsey JL, Maggi S et al (1999) International variation in the incidence of hip fractures: cross-national project on osteoporosis for the World Health Organization Program for Research on Aging. Osteoporos Int 9:242–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Breslow N, Day NE (1987) Statistical methods in cancer research, vol II—the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2004) Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. J Bone Miner Res 19:532–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huusko TM, Karppi P, Avikainen V, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R (1999) The changing picture of hip fractures: dramatic change in age distribution and no change in age-adjusted incidence within 10 years in Central Finland. Bone 24:257–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lofman O, Berglund K, Larsson L, Toss G (2002) Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types. Osteoporos Int 13:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Couris CM, Duclos A, Rabilloud M et al (2007) A seventy percent overestimation of the burden of hip fractures in women aged 85 and over. Bone 41:896–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes: models and applications. Pion, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Sullivan D, Unwin D (2002) Geographic information analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, Jacobsen SJ, Smith GS (1995) Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:695–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA (1996) Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 143:677–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 10:1802–1815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Becker C, Crow S, Toman J et al (2006) Characteristics of elderly patients admitted to an urban tertiary care hospital with osteoporotic fractures: correlations with risk factors, fracture type, gender and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int 17:410–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer HE, Berntsen GK, Sogaard AJ et al (2004) Higher bone mineral density in rural compared with urban dwellers: the NOREPOS study. Am J Epidemiol 160:1039–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Ugoni AM, Seeman E, Pasco JA, Kotowicz MA (2002) Fracture rates lower in rural than urban communities: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:466–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zingmond DS, Soohoo NF, Silverman SL (2006) The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 17:1562–1568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Feskanich D, Willett W, Colditz G (2002) Walking and leisure-time activity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 288:2300–2306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Robbins J, Aragaki AK, Kooperberg C et al (2007) Factors associated with 5-year risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. JAMA 298:2389–2398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCabe LD, Martin BR, McCabe GP, Johnston CC, Weaver CM, Peacock M (2004) Dairy intakes affect bone density in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 80:1066–1074

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Prince RL, Devine A, Dhaliwal SS, Dick IM (2006) Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 166:869–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, 69003, France

    S. Barbier & R. Ecochard

  2. 5558 Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS, UMR, Villeurbanne, 69100, France

    S. Barbier & R. Ecochard

  3. 5558 Laboratoire Biostatistique-Santé, Université Lyon 1, UMR, Villeurbanne, 69100, France

    S. Barbier & R. Ecochard

  4. Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, 69003, France

    A.-M. Schott, C. Colin & C. M. Couris

  5. Université Lyon, Lyon, 69008, France

    A.-M. Schott, C. Colin & C. M. Couris

  6. Equipe d’Accueil Santé Individu Société, Lyon, 69002, France

    A.-M. Schott, C. Colin & C. M. Couris

  7. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, 69003, France

    P. D. Delmas

  8. Unité INSERM 831, Lyon, France

    P. D. Delmas

  9. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    S. B. Jaglal

  10. Pôle Information Médicale Evaluation Recherche, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162, avenue Lacassagne, 69424, Lyon, France

    C. M. Couris

Authors
  1. S. Barbier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Ecochard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A.-M. Schott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Colin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. D. Delmas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. B. Jaglal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. M. Couris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Couris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbier, S., Ecochard, R., Schott, AM. et al. Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios. Osteoporos Int 20, 371–377 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0687-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0687-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation