Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Bone loss occurs in the regional bone following tibial shaft fracture. An earlier cross-sectional study showed that measurements made at the metaphyseal region of the tibia using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and the ultradistal region of the tibia using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were the most responsive at monitoring this bone loss. Biochemical markers of bone turnover enable us to assess the activity of bone formation and resorption during fracture healing. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine the pattern and distribution of bone loss and bone turnover following a tibial shaft fracture treated with either plaster cast or intramedullary nail. Methods: Eighteen subjects underwent bone mass measurements using DXA at the tibia and hip and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the tibia and calcaneus of both limbs at 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks following fracture, with hip and tibia DXA measurements also performed at 52 weeks. Nine of the patients treated with plaster cast had pQCT measurements at the tibia at 24 weeks. We measured three bone formation markers, bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), osteocalcin (OC) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal peptide (PINP), a marker of bone resorption, serum C-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (β-CTX) and a marker of collagen III turnover, procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) at 1 day, 3 days and 7 days and at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weeks following fracture. The greatest bone losses were observed at the ultradistal region of the tibia using DXA (28%, p <0.001) and the metaphyseal region of the tibia using pQCT (26–31%, p <0.001) at 24 weeks. In the hip, the greatest loss was in the trochanter region at 24 weeks (10%, p <0.001). The greatest loss at the calcaneus measured using QUS was for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) measured using CUBA Clinical at 24 weeks (13%, p =0.01). Results: At 1 year, there was a small recovery in bone loss (ultradistal tibia DXA, 20%, p <0.01; trochanter DXA 9%, p <0.001). Bone turnover increased following fracture (PINP +72±21%, p <0.0001, bone ALP +199±22%, p =0.004, β-CTX +105±23%, p <0.0001, all at 24 weeks). There was a smaller +33±10% increase in osteocalcin at 24 weeks. PIIINP concentration peaked at week 8 (+57±9%, p <0.0001). The bone resorption marker β-CTX showed an earlier rise (week 2, 139±33%) than the bone formation markers. Conclusions: We conclude that: (1) bone loss following tibial shaft fracture occurs both proximal and distal to the fracture; (2) the decreased BMD is largest for trabecular bone in the tibia with similar measurements using DXA and pQCT; (3) there is limited recovery of bone lost at the hip and tibia at 1 year; (4) tibial speed of sound (SOS) demonstrated a greater decrease than calcaneal SOS when comparing z -scores; (5) BUA is the QUS variable that shows the biggest decrease of bone mass at the calcaneus; (6) increase in bone turnover occurs following fracture with an earlier increase in bone resorption markers and a later rise in bone formation markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bickerstaff DR, Kanis JA (1994) Algodystrophy: an under-recognized complication of minor trauma. Br J Rheumatology 33:240–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cattermole HC, Cook JE, Fordham JN, Muckle DS, Cunningham JL (1997) Bone mineral changes during tibial fracture healing. Clin Orthop 339:190–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drysdale IP, Hinkley HJ, Shale ML (1998) Bilateral variation of calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation [abstract]. Bone 23 [Suppl]:S523

  4. Emami A, Larsson S, Hellquist E, Mallmin H (2001) Limited bone loss in the hip and heel after reamed intramedullary fixation and early weight-bearing of tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:560–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eyres KS, Kanis JA (1995) Bone loss after tibial fracture. Evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:473–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Findlay SC, Eastell R, Ingle BM (2002) Measurement of bone adjacent to tibial shaft fractures. Osteoporos Int 13:980–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finsen V, Haave O (1987) Changes in bone mass after tibial shaft fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 58:369–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ingle BM, Hay SM, Bottjer HM, Eastell R (1999) Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following ankle fracture. Osteoporos Int 10:408–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ingle BM, Hay SM, Bottjer HM, Eastell R (1999) Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following distal forearm fracture. Osteoporos Int 10:399–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Sievanen H, Oja P, Vuori I (1994) Osteoporosis in men with a history of tibial fracture. J Bone Miner Res 9:423–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karlsson MK, Nilsson BE, Obrant KJ (1993) Bone mineral loss after lower extremity trauma. 62 cases followed for 15–38 years. Acta Orthop Scand 64:362–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lilley J, Walters BG, Heath DA, Drolc Z (1991) Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 2:274–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  14. Mundy GR (1990) Bone remodelling. In: Favus MJ (ed) Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 30–38

  15. Obrant KJ (1984) Tetracycline double-labelling in post-traumatic osteopenia in man. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:81–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Obrant KJ (2004) Trabecular bone changes in the greater trochanter after fracture of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop Scand 55:78–82

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarangi PP, Ward AJ, Smith EJ, Staddon GE, Atkins RM (1993) Algodystrophy and osteoporosis after tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:450–452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ulivieri FM, Bossi E, Azzoni R, Ronzani C, Trevisan C, Montesano A, Ortolani S (1990) Quantification by dual photon absorptiometry of local bone loss after fracture. Clin Orthop 250:291–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Poest Clement E, van der Wiel H, Patka P, Roos JC, Lips P (1999) Long-term consequences of fracture of the lower leg: cross-sectional study and long-term follow-up of bone mineral density in the hip after fracture of the lower leg. Bone 24:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van der Wiel HE, Lips P, Nauta J, Patka P, Haarman HJ, Teule GJ (1994) Loss of bone in the proximal part of the femur following unstable fractures of the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:230–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Veitch SW, Findlay SC, Ingle BM, Ibbotson CJ, Hamer AJ, Eastell R (2004) Accuracy and precision of peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements at the tibial metaphysis. J Clin Densitom 7:209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinreb M, Rodan GA, Thompson DD (1989) Osteopenia in the immobilized rat hind limb is associated with increased resorption and decreased bone formation. Bone 10:187–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang RS, Tsai KS, Chieung PU, Liu TK (1997) Symmetry of bone mineral density at the proximal femur with emphasis on the effect of side dominance. Calcif Tissue Int 61:189–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Mick Denison (M.D.) and Dr. Sarah Gowlett (S.G.) for reviewing X-rays.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

    S. W. Veitch & A. J. Hamer

  2. Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Division of Clinical Sciences (North), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    S. W. Veitch, S. C. Findlay, A. J. Hamer, A. Blumsohn, Richard Eastell & B. M. Ingle

  3. Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Clinical Sciences (North), University of Sheffield, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK

    Richard Eastell

Authors
  1. S. W. Veitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. C. Findlay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. J. Hamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Blumsohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard Eastell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B. M. Ingle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Eastell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veitch, S.W., Findlay, S.C., Hamer, A.J. et al. Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture. Osteoporos Int 17, 364–372 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-2025-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-2025-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation