Skip to main content
Log in

Tod durch Elektroschockdistanzwaffen

Reine Ausschlussdiagnose?

Death by conducted electrical weapons

Diagnosis by exclusion?

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Rechtsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Distanzelektroimpulswaffen wie der TASER® führen durch Übertragung hoher Spannung bei geringer Stromstärke zu einer willentlich nichtbeeinflussbaren, allgemeinen Muskelkontraktion mit konsekutiver Immobilisierung des Getroffenen. Die getroffene Person stürzt zu Boden und ist für die Dauer der TASER-Wirkung handlungsunfähig. Die Wiederholungsraten von 15–20 elektrischen Impulsen/s rufen eine klonische Muskelkontraktion hervor, ohne dabei einen glatten Tetanus zu initiieren. Trotz etlicher wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, die die Gefährlichkeit dieser Geräte bei fachgerechter Anwendung als niedrig einstufen, wird immer wieder von Todesfällen berichtet, die in relevanter zeitlicher Nähe zu einem Beschuss mit TASER®-Geräten stehen und deren Todesursache nicht abschließend geklärt werden konnte. Der vorliegende Beitrag setzt sich mit der Funktion und Wirkungsweise von Distanzelektroimpulswaffen auseinander und erörtert anhand aktueller wissenschaftlicher Untersuchungen mögliche, potenziell tödliche pathophysiologische Konsequenzen für den menschlichen Körper während und nach einer TASER-Applikation. Anhand der Darstellung eines Todesfalls nach einem TASER-Einsatz in Vancouver 2007 werden Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der forensischen Beweisführung bei konkurrierenden Todesursachen diskutiert.

Abstract

Electronic control devices (ECDs) deliver short high-voltage, low current energy pulses to temporarily paralyze a person by causing electrical interruption of the body’s normal energy pulses (electromuscular disruption, EMD). When a person is hit by the device there is immediate loss of control over the body, the person falls to the ground and is incapacitated for the duration of electrical stimulation. The impulse rate of 15–20 pulses per second causes uncontrolled muscle contraction, appearing as muscle spasms without initiating a prolonged tetanus. Despite many scientific publications which classify the health risks of an appropriate use of the TASER® device as minor, there are still a number of cases linked to the device with a fatal outcome. Based on the current literature, the following article describes the mechanisms by which the device operates and discusses potentially dangerous pathophysiological consequences for the human body. On the basis of a fatal TASER® application during a police operation in Vancouver 2007 the possibilities and limitations of forensic reasoning on fatalities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Kunz SN, Grove N, Fischer F (2012) Acute pathophysiological influences of conducted electrical weapons in humans: a review of current literature. Forensic Sci Int 221:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fieseler S, Zinka B, Peschel O, Kunz SN (2011) Elektrowaffe TASER® – Funktion, Wirkung, kritische Aspekte. Rechtsmedizin 21:535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF et al (2011) The respiratory, metabolic, and neuroendocrine effects of a new generation electronic control device. Forensic Sci Int 207:55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Reardon RF et al (2011) Human cardiovascular effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon. Forensic Sci Int 204:50–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bux R, Andresen A, Rotschild M (2002) Elektrowaffe ADVANCED TASER M6. Rechtsmedizin 12:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney JD (2009) Transcutaneous muscle stimulation. In: Kroll M, Ho J (Hrsg) TASER® conducted electrical weapons: physiology, pathology, and law. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 51–62

  7. Sun H (2007) Models of ventricular fibrillation probability and neuromuscular stimulation after TASER® use in humans. PhD thesis. University of Wisconsin

  8. Amnesty International (2012) USA: statistical analysis of deaths following police TASER use. http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/AMR51/013/2012/en/6ac90938-73f2-41d3-aa08-bd971f2dffa0/amr510132012en.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Februar 2012

  9. Kornblum RN, Reddy SK (1991) Effects of the TASER in fatalities involving police confrontation. J Forensic Sci 36:434–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strote J, Range Hutson H (2006) Taser use in restraint-related deaths. Prehosp Emerg Care 10:447–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jauchem JR (2010) Repeated or long-duration TASER® electronic control device exposures: acidemia and lack of respiration. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walter RJ, Dennis AJ, Valentino DJ et al (2008) TASER X26 discharges in swine produce potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Acad Emerg Med 15:66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho J, Lapine A, Joing S et al (2008) Confirmation of respiration during trapezial conducted electrical weapon application. Acad Emerg Med 15:398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kunz SN (2012) Biasis in TASER research. Am Heart J 163:e7–e8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reilly JP (1998) Cardiac sensitivity to electrical stimulation. In: Reilly JP (Hrsg) Applied bioelectricity: from electrical stimulation to electropathology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 194–239

  16. Brinkmann B, Madea B (2004) Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin, Bd I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio

  17. Kroll MW (2009) Physiology and pathology of TASER® electronic devices. J Forensic Leg Med 16:173–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho JD, Miner JR, Lakireddy DR et al (2006) Cardiovascular and physiologic effects of conducted electrical weapon discharge in resting adults. Acad Emerg Med 13:589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Bultman LL et al (2007) Respiratory effect of prolonged electrical weapon application on human volunteers. Acad Emerg Med 14:197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Otahbachi M, Cevik C, Bagdure S, Nugent K (2010) Excited delirium, restraints, and unexpected death, a review of pathogenesis. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 31:107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ross DL (1998) Factors associated with excited delirium deaths in police custody. Mod Pathol 11:1127–1137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jauchem RJ (2010) Deaths in custody: are some due to electronic control devices (including TASER® devices) or excited delirium? J Forensic Leg Med 17:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Amateurvideo des Polizeieinsatzes am Flughafen in Vancouver am 14.10.2007. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= IPe_hf7aBXM

  24. Day P (2002) What evidence exits about the safety of physical restraint when used by law enforcement and medical staff to control individuals with acute behavioural disturbance? NZHTA Tech Brief Series 1

  25. Sztajnkrycer MD, Baez AA (2005) Cocaine, excited delirium and sudden unexpected death. Emerg Med Serv 34:77–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Feeney C, Vu J, Ani C (2010) Acute agitated delirious state associated with TASER exposure. J Natl Med Assoc 102:1254–1257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jauchem JR (2011) Pathophysiologic changes due to TASER® device versus excited delirium: potential relevance to deaths-in-custody? J Forensic Leg Med 18:145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dawes DM, Ho JD, Cole JB (2011) Response to „Acute agitated delirious state associated with TASER exposure“. J Natl Med Assoc 103:986–988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.N. Kunz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunz, S., Monticelli, F. & Kaiser, C. Tod durch Elektroschockdistanzwaffen. Rechtsmedizin 22, 369–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-012-0848-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-012-0848-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation