Skip to main content
Log in

Physical restraint in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a survey of French practice

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the perceived utilization of physical restraint (PR) in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to identify clinical and structural factors influencing PR use.

Methods

A questionnaire was personally handed to one intensivist in 130 ICUs in France then collected on-site 2 weeks later.

Results

The questionnaire was returned by 121 ICUs (response rate, 93 %), 66 % of which were medical-surgical ICUs. Median patient-to-nurse ratio was 2.8 (2.5–3.0). In 82 % of ICUs, PR is used at least once during mechanical ventilation in more than 50 % of patients. In 65 % of ICUs, PR, when used, is applied for more than 50 % of mechanical ventilation duration. Physical restraint is often used during awakening from sedation and when agitation occurs and is less commonly used in patients receiving deep sedation or neuromuscular blockers or having severe tetraparesis. In 29 % of ICUs, PR is used in more than 50 % of awake, calm and co-operative patients. PR is started without written medical order in more than 50 % of patients in 68 % of ICUs, and removed without written medical order in more than 50 % of patients in 77 % of ICUs. Only 21 % of ICUs have a written local procedure for PR use.

Conclusions

This survey in a country with a relatively high patient-to-nurse ratio shows that PR is frequently used in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, with wide variations according to patient condition. The common absence of medical orders for starting or removing PR indicates that these decisions are mostly made by the nurses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L (2002) A review of physical restraint minimization in the acute and residential care settings. J Adv Nurs 40:616–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Micek ST, Anand NJ, Laible BR, Shannon WD, Kollef MH (2005) Delirium as detected by the CAM-ICU predicts restraint use among mechanically ventilated medical patients. Crit Care Med 33:1260–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baer CL (1998) Is there an answer to preventing unplanned extubations? Crit Care Med 26:989–990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang LY, Wang KW, Chao YF (2008) Influence of physical restraint on unplanned extubation of adult intensive care patients: a case-control study. Am J Crit Care 17:408–415 quiz 416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Curry K, Cobb S, Kutash M, Diggs C (2008) Characteristics associated with unplanned extubations in a surgical intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 17:45–51 quiz 52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rotondi AJ, Chelluri L, Sirio C, Mendelsohn A, Schulz R, Belle S, Im K, Donahoe M, Pinsky MR (2002) Patients’ recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 30:746–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bray K, Hill K, Robson W, Leaver G, Walker N, O’Leary M, Delaney T, Walsh D, Gager M, Waterhouse C (2004) British Association of Critical Care Nurses position statement on the use of restraint in adult critical care units. Nurs Crit Care 9:199–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones C, Backman C, Capuzzo M, Flaatten H, Rylander C, Griffiths RD (2007) Precipitants of post-traumatic stress disorder following intensive care: a hypothesis generating study of diversity in care. Intensive Care Med 33:978–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin B, Mathisen L (2005) Use of physical restraints in adult critical care: a bicultural study. Am J Crit Care 14:133–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brook AD, Ahrens TS, Schaiff R, Prentice D, Sherman G, Shannon W, Kollef MH (1999) Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 27:2609–2615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kress J, Pohlman A, O’Connor M, Hall J (2000) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 342:1471–1477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Jonghe B, Bastuji-Garin S, Fangio P, Lacherade JC, Jabot J, Appere-De-Vecchi C, Rocha N, Outin H (2005) Sedation algorithm in critically ill patients without acute brain injury. Crit Care Med 33:120–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strom T, Martinussen T, Toft P (2010) A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial. Lancet 375:475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Treggiari MM, Romand JA, Yanez ND, Deem SA, Goldberg J, Hudson L, Heidegger CP, Weiss NS (2009) Randomized trial of light versus deep sedation on mental health after critical illness. Crit Care Med 37:2527–2534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta S, Burry L, Fischer S, Martinez-Motta JC, Hallett D, Bowman D, Wong C, Meade MO, Stewart TE, Cook DJ (2006) Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 34:374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soliman HM, Melot C, Vincent JL (2001) Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey. Br J Anaesth 87:186–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Benbenbishty J, Adam S, Endacott R (2010) Physical restraint use in intensive care units across Europe: the PRICE study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 26:241–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurlock-Chorostecki C, Kielb C (2006) Knot-So-Fast: a learning plan to minimize patient restraint in critical care. Dynamics 17:12–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kielb C, Hurlock-Chorostecki C, Sipprell D (2005) Can minimal patient restraint be safely implemented in the intensive care unit? Dynamics 16:16–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Constantin JM, Chanques G, De Jonghe B, Sanchez P, Mantz J, Payen JF, Sztark F, Richebe P, Lagneau F, Capdevila X, Bazin JE, Lefrant JY (2010) La sédation-analgésie au quotidien: enquête de pratique auprès de 218 services de réanimation en France. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 29:339–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Logistic support for the survey was from GSK Laboratory, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard De Jonghe.

Additional information

This article is discussed in the editorial available at: doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2716-8.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Jonghe, B., Constantin, JM., Chanques, G. et al. Physical restraint in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a survey of French practice. Intensive Care Med 39, 31–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2715-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2715-9

Keywords

Navigation