Skip to main content
Log in

Koxarthrose – ein Update

Coxarthrosis – an update

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Hüftgelenkarthrose ist im Erwachsenenalter die häufigste Erkrankung des Hüftgelenks. Die fehlende Konsensusdefinition dieser Erkrankung führt zu einer scheinbar breiten Varianz bzgl. Inzidenz und Prävalenz. Die Diagnose wird aufgrund des radiologischen Befundes und der klinischen Symptomatik gestellt. Die typischen konventionell-radiologischen sowie CT-Befunde sind: Gelenkspaltverschmälerung, Osteophytenformation, subchondrale Demineralisation/Sklerose, subchondrale Zystenbildung, freie Gelenkkörper, Gelenkfehlstellung, Gelenkdeformität. Durch die MR-Diagnostik lassen sich weitere Frühsymptome bzw. Aktivitätszeichen festhalten: Knorpelödem, -riss, -defekt, subchondrales Knochenmarködem, synoviales Ödem und Gelenkerguss sowie Muskelatrophie.

Derzeit wird die Bedeutung oft nur geringfügiger Fehlformen (z. B. Impingement, Dysplasie), Fehlstellungen, Ligamentlockerungen etc. sowie Störungen in der Gefäßversorgung (z. B. Osteonekrose etc.) heftig diskutiert, die alle als mögliche Präarthrose eine hohe Wahrscheinlichkeit zur Arthroseentwicklung aufweisen. Dem gesamthaften Gelenkcontainment sowie der Genderproblematik wird heute ebenfalls richtigerweise höhere Aufmerksamkeit gewidmet.

In der Forschung wird mittels verschiedener MR-Verfahren (z. B. Höchstfeld-MR mit H- und Na- Spektroskopie, T2*-Mapping etc.) der Knorpelstoffwechsel und seine Änderungen bei Präarthrose untersucht (biochemisches Imaging). Zweifellos sind auf diesem Gebiet bereits in wenigen Jahren neue tief greifende Erkenntnisse zu erwarten.

Abstract

Degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip joint (coxarthrosis) is the most common disease of the hip joint in adults. The diagnosis is based on a combination of radiographic findings and characteristic clinical symptoms. The lack of a radiographic consensus definition has seemingly resulted in a variation of the published incidences and prevalence of degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip joint. The chronological sequence of degeneration includes the following basic symptoms on conventional radiographs and CT: joint space narrowing, development of osteophytes, subchondral demineralisation/sclerosis and cyst formation, as well as loose bodies, joint malalignment and deformity. MR imaging allows additional visualization of early symptoms and/or activity signs such as cartilage edema, cartilage tears and defects, subchondral bone marrow edema, synovial edema and thickening, joint effusion and muscle atrophy.

The scientific dispute concerns the significance of (minimal) joint malalignment (e.g. impingement, dysplasia etc.) and forms of malpositioning which as possible prearthrosis have a high probability of leading to degenerative osteoarthritis. Moreover, without any question, the preservation of joint containment and gender differences are important additional basic diagnostic principles, which have gained great interest in recent years.

In research different MR procedures such as Na and H spectroscopy, T2*-mapping etc. with ultrahigh field MR allow cartilage metabolism and its changes in early degenerative osteoarthritis (“biochemical imaging”) to be studied. There is no doubt that even in a few years new profound knowledge is to be expected in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11
Abb. 12
Abb. 13
Abb. 14
Abb. 15
Abb. 16
Abb. 17
Abb. 18
Abb. 19
Abb. 20

Literatur

  1. Keuttner K, Goldberg VM (eds) (1995) Osteoarthritic disorders. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp xxi–xxv

  2. Cicutti FM et al (1997) What is the evidence that osteoartheitis is genetically determined? Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 11(4):657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamerman D (1989) The biology of osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 320:1322–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Imhof H (2005) Arthrose (Degenerative Gelenkserkrankungen). In: Freyschmidtt J (Hrsg) Handbuch diagnostische Radiologie, muskuloskelettales System 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  5. Imhof H, Sulzbacher I, Grampp S et al (2000) Subchondral bone and cartilage disease – a rediscovered functional unit. Invest Radiol 35(10):581–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliveira SA, Felson DT, Reed JI et al (1995) Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organisation. Arthritis Rheum 38:1134–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karachios TR, Karantanas AH, Malizios K (2007) Hip osteoarthritis: what the radiologist wants to know. EJR 63:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones G, Glisson M, Hynes K, Cicuttini F (2000) Sex and site differences in cartilage development: a possible explanation for variations in knee osteoarthritis in later life. Arthritis Rheum 43:1543–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prager CH (2008) Frauen belasten ihre Gelenke anders. Clinicum 8:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mc Goey BV, Deitel M, Saplys RJF, Kliman MEV (1990) Effect of weight loss on musculoskeletal pain in the morbidly obese. J Bone Joint Surg 72-B:322–323

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stoller DW (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging in orthopedics and sports medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Philadelphia

  12. Milz S, Putz R (1994) Lückenbildung der subchondralen Mineralisierungszone des Tibiaplateaus. Osteologie 34:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crock HV (1996) An atlas of vascular anatomy of the skeleton and spinal cord. Dunitz, London

  14. Nakano T, Thompson JR, Christopherson RJ, Aherne FX (1986) Blood flow distribution in hind limb bones and joint cartilage from young growing pigs. Can J Vet Res 50:96–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Imhof H, Krestan C, Gahleitner A et al (2002) MRI of the cartilage. Eur Radiol 12(11):2781–2793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Resnick D, Kang HS, Pretterklieger MS (2007) Internal derangements of joints. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia

  17. Trattnig S, Mlynarik V, Huber M et al (2000) Magnet resonance imaging of articular cartilage and evaluation of cartilage disease. Invest Radiol 35:595–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schober O, Heindl W (2008) PET-CT. Thieme, Stuttgart

  19. Resnick D (1975) Patterns of migration of the femoral head in osteoarthritis of the hip. Roentgenographic-pathologic correlation and comparison with rheumatoid arthritis. AJR 125:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  20. Czerny C, Hofmann S, Urban M (1999) MT-arthrography of the adult acetabular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy. AJR 173:345–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mamisch T, Trattnig S, Nöbauer I (2006) High-field and ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging: new possibilities for imaging joints. Z Rheumatol 65(8):681–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Imhof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imhof, H., Nöbauer-Huhmann, I. & Trattnig, S. Koxarthrose – ein Update. Radiologe 49, 400–409 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-009-1832-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-009-1832-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation