Skip to main content
Log in

Hodentorsion: Diagnose, Differenzialdiagnose und Therapie im Kindesalter

Testicular torsion: diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment in children

  • Freies Thema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das akute Skrotum ist eine Notfallsituation, wobei in weniger als 20% der Fälle eine Hodentorsion vorliegt. Inzwischen hat sich die Sonographie zur entscheidenden diagnostischen Untersuchungsmodalität entwickelt deren zunehmende Anwendung zu technischen Fortschritten der Ultraschalldiagnostik, zu einer kritischen Bewertung von Ultraschallkriterien zum Ausschluss einer Hodentorsion und zu einer Standardisierung der Untersuchungsabläufe geführt hat. Die in der Dopplersonographie dargestellte seitengleiche zentrale arterielle und venöse Perfusion ist hierbei das wichtigste Kriterium zum Ausschluss einer Torsion.

Weitere Kriterien wie „resistant index“, Parenchymstruktur des Hodens im Seitvergleich, Nachweis eines torquierten Samenstrangs oder seitendifferente Perfusion des Hodenparenchyms werden erörtert und auf die Schwierigkeiten bei der partiellen und intermittierenden Hodentorsion hingewiesen. Alternative Untersuchungsmethoden und die Bedeutung der Sonographie zur Klärung weiterer Ursachen in der Differenzialdiagnose des akuten Skrotums werden aufgezeigt. Zusammenfassend gelingt durch die gemeinsame Betrachtung von B-Mode-Bildgebung, Farbdoppler- und Powerdopplersonographie sowie der Analyse der Doppler-Fluss-Kurven nach klinischer Untersuchung die geforderte umfassende Beurteilung des Hodens beim akuten Skrotum des Jungen.

Abstract

Acute scrotum represents an emergency situation although testicular torsion is present in less than 20% of the cases. Sonography has meanwhile become the definitive modality for diagnosis. Its increasing use before surgical intervention has led to technical improvements in ultrasound diagnostics and critical assessment of ultrasound criteria to exclude testicular torsion as well as standardization of examination procedures. Central arterial and venous perfusion shown to be bilaterally equal on Doppler sonography is the most important criterion for excluding torsion.

This article discusses other criteria such as the “resistance index,” comparison of parenchymal structure of both testes, evidence for spermatic cord torsion, or differences between the sides in perfusion of the testicular parenchyma and highlights the difficulties involved in partial and intermittent testicular torsion. Alternative investigative methods and the significance of sonography in the differential diagnosis of other underlying causes are addressed. In summary, the combination of interpreting B-mode imaging, color Doppler, and power Doppler sonography and analyzing Doppler flow curves after clinical examination results in successful and conclusive evaluation of the testes in cases of acute scrotum in boys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1a-c
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4a,b
Abb. 5a,b

Literatur

  1. Arce JD, Cortes M, Vargas JC (2002) Sonographic diagnosis of acute spermatic cord torsion. Rotation of the cord: a key of the diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 32:485–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker LA, Sigman D, Mathews RI, Benson J, Docimo SG (2000) An analysis of clinical outcomes using color doppler testicular ultrasound for testicular torsion. Pediatrics 105:604–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker D, Burst M, Wehler M, Tauschek D, Herold C, Hahn EG (1997) Differential diagnosis of acute testicular pain using color-coded duplex ultrasonography: difference between testicular torsion and epididymitis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 122:1405–1409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Sira L, Laor T (2000) Severe scrotal pain in boys with Henoch-Schonlein purpura: incidence and sonography. Pediatr Radiol 30:125–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciftci AO, Senocak ME, Cahit Tanyel F, Buyukpamukcu N (2004) Clinical predictors for differential diagnosis of acute scrotum. Eur J Pediatr Surg 14:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diamond DA, Borer JG, Peters CA, Cilento BG, Sorcini A, Kaefer M, Paltiel HJ (2003) Neonatal scrotal haematoma: mimicker of neonatal testicular torsion. BJU Int 91:675–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dogra VS, Rubens DJ, Gottlieb RH, Bhatt S (2004) Torsion and beyond: new twists in spectral Doppler evaluation of the scrotum. J Ultrasound Med 23:1077–1185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubinsky TJ, Chen P, Maklad N (1998) Color-flow and power Doppler imaging of the testes. World J Urol 16:35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunne PJ, O’Loughlin BS (2000) Testicular torsion: time is the enemy. ANZ Surg 70:441–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farriol VG, Comella XP, Agromayor EG, Creixams XS, Martinez De La Torre IB (2000) Gray-scale and power doppler sonographic appearances of acute inflammatory diseases of the scrotum. J Clin Ultrasound 28:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frush DP, Babcock DS, Lewis AG, Paltiel HJ, Rupich R, Bove KE, Sheldon CA (1995) Comparison of color Doppler sonography and radionuclide imaging in different degrees of torsion in rabbit testes. Acad Radiol 2:945–951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galejs LE, Kass EL (1998) Color Doppler ultrasound evaluation of the acute scrotum. Tech Urol 4:182–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hara Y, Tajiri T, Matsuura K, Hasegawa A (2004) Acute scrotum caused by Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Int J Urol 11:578–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hormann M, Balassy C, Philipp MO, Pumberger W (2004) Imaging of the acute scrotum in children. Eur Radiol 14:974–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jee WH, Choe BY, Byun JY, Shinn KS, Hwang TK (1997) Resistive index of the intrascrotal artery in scrotal inflammatory disease. Acta Radiol 38:1026–1030

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalfa N, Veyrac C, Baud C, Couture A, Averous M, Galifer RB (2004) Ultrasonography of the spermatic cord in children with testicular torsion: impact on the surgical strategy. J Urol 172:1692–1695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klin B, Lotan G, Efrati Y, Zlotkevich L, Strauss S (2002) Acute idiopathic scrotal edema in children revisited. J Pediatr Surg 37:1200–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kravchick S, Cytron S, Leibovici O, Linov L, London D, Altshuler A, Yulish E (2001) Color Doppler sonography: its real role in the evaluation of children with highly suspected testicular torsion. Eur Radiol 11:1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landa HM, Gylys-Morin V, Mattery RF, Hajek P, Krous HF, Kaplan GW, Packer MG (1988) Detection of testicular torsion by magnetic resonance imaging in a rat model. J Urol 140:1178–1180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McAndrew HF, Pemberton R, Kikiros CS, Gollow I (2002) The incidence and investigation of acute scrotal problems in children. Pediatr Surg Int 18:435–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Middleton WD, Middleton MA, Dierks M, Keetch D, Dierks S (1997) Sonographic prediction of viability in testicular torsion: preliminary observations. J Ultrasound Med 16:23–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Myers JB, Lovell MA, Lee RS, Furness PD, Koyle M (2004) Torsion of an indirect hernia sac causing acute scrotum. J Pediatr Surg 39:122–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson CP, Williams JF, Bloom DA (2003) The cremasteric reflex: a useful but imperfect sign in testicular torsion. J Pediatr Surg 38:1248–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nussbaum Blask AR, Bulas D, Shalaby-Rana E, Rushton G, Shao C, Majd M (2002) Color Doppler sonography and scintigraphy of the testis: a prospective, comparative analysis in children with acute scrotal pain. Pediatr Emerg Care 18:67–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavlica P, Barozzi L (2001) Imaging of the acute scrotum. Eur Radiol 11:220–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sellars ME, Sidhu PS (2003) Ultrasound appearence of testicular appendages: pictorial review. Eur Radiol 13:127–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh S, Adivarekar P, Karmarkar SJ (2003) Acute scrotum in children: a rare presentation of acute, non-perforated appendizitis. Pediatr Surg Int 19:298–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smet MH, Palmers M, Oyen R, Breysem L (2004) Ultrasound diagnosis of infantile scrotal emphysema. Pediatr Radiol 34:824–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Somekh E, Gorenstein A, Serour F (2004) Acute epididymitis in boys: evidence of a post-infectious etiology. J Urol 171:391–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stehr M, Boehm R (2003) Critical validation of color Doppler ultrasound in diagnostics of acute scrotum in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 13:386–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Trambert MA, Mattrey RF, Levine D, Berthoty DP (1990) Subacute scrotal pain: evaluation of torsion versus epididymitis with MR imaging. Radiology 175:53–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Traubici J, Daneman A, Navarro O, Mohanta A, Garcia C (2003) Testicular torsion in neonates and infants: sonographic features in 30 patients. AJR 80:1143–1145

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Ohkubo K, Ishimori T, Amoh Y, Okumura A, Oda K, Hayashi T, Dodo Y, Arai Y (2000) Scrotal disorders: evaluation of testicular enhancement patterns at dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 217:219–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber DM, Rosslein R, Fliegel C (2000) Color Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of acute scrotum in boys. Eur J Pediatr Surg 10:235–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams HJ, Abernethy LJ, Losty PD, Kotiloglu E (2004) Meconium periorchitis — a rare cause of a paratesticular mass. Pediatr Radiol 34:421–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zoller G, Kugler A, Ringert RH (2000) „False positive“ testicular perfusion in testicular torsion in power Doppler ultrasound. Urology A-39:251–253

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Günther.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Günther, P., Schenk, JP. Hodentorsion: Diagnose, Differenzialdiagnose und Therapie im Kindesalter. Radiologe 46, 590–595 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-005-1256-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-005-1256-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation