Skip to main content
Log in

Differenzialindikation für die Psychotherapie bei Psychosen

Gibt es empirisch begründbare Kriterien?

Differential indication for psychotherapy in psychosis

Are there evidence-based criteria?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Nervenarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die wesentliche Aufgabe dieses Beitrags besteht darin zu prüfen, ob der gegenwärtige Forschungsstand zur Psychotherapie bei schizophrenen Störungen empirisch begründete Aussagen darüber erlaubt, welche Patienten in besonderer Weise von welchem Psychotherapieangebot profitieren. Methodologisch kann diese Aufgabe als die Frage nach Moderatoren des Therapieerfolgs angesehen werden. Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage wird zuerst der Stand der Wirksamkeitsforschung für schizophrene Störungen zusammengefasst. Dann werden Studien zum Vergleich aktiver Psychotherapieverfahren beschrieben. Empirische Studien zu Fragen der Routineversorgung in Deutschland liegen nicht vor. Es erscheint jedoch gerechtfertigt, zunächst die Kombination von kognitiver Verhaltenstherapie (KVT) und Familieninterventionen zu empfehlen. Bei anderer Präferenz der Betroffenen und/oder fehlender Passung des Therapiemodells zum Patienten, können andere Verfahren vorgeschlagen werden. Studien, in denen Erfolgsprädiktoren der KVT dargestellt werden, zeigen, dass bessere Krankheitseinsicht, weibliches Geschlecht, höheres Bildungsniveau und ein Alter >21 Jahre auf einen besseren Verlauf der KVT hinweisen. Insgesamt sind die Möglichkeiten zur Differenzialindikation sehr limitiert und es ist ein erheblicher Forschungsbedarf festzustellen.

Abstract

The major objective of this paper is to discuss the available evidence on the question as to which patients benefit most from psychotherapy in psychotic disorders and the question of which kind of psychotherapy. From a methodological perspective, this task can be seen as the question of moderators of treatment success. To answer this question, the status of efficacy research on psychotherapeutic interventions in schizophrenia is summarized in a first step. Secondly, studies comparing different active psychotherapeutic approaches are discussed. There are no studies available on routine psychotherapeutic care. However, there appears to be a rationale for recommending a combination of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family therapy. If patients prefer other approaches or if the treatment model does not suit the patient, other approaches should be offered. There is evidence for CBT that insight into psychosis, female gender, a higher level of education, and age >21 are indicators of a better course in CBT. Overall, the options for differential indications are highly limited and considerably more research is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Buchkremer G, Klingberg S, Holle R, Schulze-Moenking H, Hornung W (1997) Psychoeducational psychotherapy for schizophrenic patients and their key relatives or care-givers: results of a 2-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand 96:483–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Currell S, Christodoulides T, Siitarinen J, Dudley R (2016) Patient factors that impact upon cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: therapists’ perspectives. Behav Cogn Psychother 44:493–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (2006) Behandlungsleitlinie Schizophrenie. Steinkopff, Darmstadt (Redaktion: Gaebel W, Falkai P.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dixon L, Perkins D, Calmes C (2009) Guideline watch (September 2009): practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans-Jones C, Peters E, Barker C (2009) The therapeutic relationship in CBT for psychosis: client, therapist and therapy factors. Behav Cogn Psychother 37:527–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falloon IR, Boyd JL, McGill CW, Razani J, Moss HB, Gilderman AM (1982) Family management in the prevention of exacerbations of schizophrenia: a controlled study. N Engl J Med 306:1437–1440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gumley A, O’Grady M, McNay L, Reilly J, Power K, Norrie J (2003) Early intervention for relapse in schizophrenia: results of a 12-month randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy. Psychol Med 33:419–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herz MI, Lamberti JS, Mintz J, Scott R, O’Dell SP, McCartan L, Nix G (2000) A program for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57:277–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jauhar S, McKenna PJ, Radua J, Fung E, Salvador R, Laws KR (2014) Cognitive-behavioural therapy for the symptoms of schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis with examination of potential bias. Br J Psychiatry 204:20–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jolley S, Ferner H, Bebbington P, Garety P, Dunn G, Freeman D, Fowler D, Kuipers E (2014) Delusional belief flexibility and informal caregiving relationships in psychosis: a potential cognitive route for the protective effect of social support. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 23:389–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung E, Wiesjahn M, Rief W, Lincoln TM (2015) Perceived therapist genuineness predicts therapeutic alliance in cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis. Br J Clin Psychol 54:34–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG, Agras WS (2002) Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:877–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurtz MM, Mueser KT (2008) A meta-analysis of controlled research on social skills training for schizophrenia. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:491–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtz MM, Richardson CL (2012) Social cognitive training for schizophrenia: a meta-analytic investigation of controlled research. Schizophr Bull 38:1092–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lincoln TM, Rief W, Westermann S, Ziegler M, Kesting ML, Heibach E, Mehl S (2014) Who stays, who benefits? Predicting dropout and change in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. Psychiatry Res 216:198–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lincoln TM, Wilhelm K, Nestoriuc Y (2007) Effectiveness of psychoeducation for relapse, symptoms, knowledge, adherence and functioning in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 96:232–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malmberg L, Fenton M (2001) Individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis for schizophrenia and severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001360

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McGurk SR, Twamley EW, Sitzer DI, McHugo GJ, Mueser KT (2007) A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 164:1791–1802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehl S, Werner D, Lincoln TM (2015) Does Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) show a sustainable effect on delusions? A meta-analysis. Front Psychol 6:1450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Morrison AP, Turkington D, Pyle M, Spencer H, Brabban A, Dunn G, Christodoulides T, Dudley R, Chapman N, Callcott P, Grace T, Lumley V, Drage L, Tully S, Irving K, Cummings A, Byrne R, Davies LM, Hutton P (2014) Cognitive therapy for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders not taking antipsychotic drugs: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 383:1395–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrison AP, Turkington D, Wardle M, Spencer H, Barratt S, Dudley R, Brabban A, Hutton P (2012) A preliminary exploration of predictors of outcome and cognitive mechanisms of change in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis in people not taking antipsychotic medication. Behav Res Ther 50:163–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2014) Schizophrenia. Core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care (update). National clinical practice guideline number 82. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. O’Keeffe J, Conway R, McGuire B (2017) A systematic review examining factors predicting favourable outcome in cognitive behavioural interventions for psychosis. Schizophr Res 183:22–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pharoah F, Mari J, Rathbone J, Wong W (2010) Family intervention for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pitschel-Walz G, Leucht S, Bäuml J, Kissling W, Engel R (2001) The effect of family interventions on relapse and rehospitalization in schizophrenia—a meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 27:73–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Turner DT, van der Gaag M, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P (2014) Psychological interventions for psychosis: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Am J Psychiatry 171(5):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P (2011) A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry 168:472–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wykes T, Steel C, Everitt B, Tarrier N (2008) Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia: effect sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigor. Schizophr Bull 34:523–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xia J, Merinder LB, Belgamwar MR (2011) Psychoeducation for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002831.pub2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Klingberg.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

S. Klingberg und K. Hesse sind Autoren von Therapiemanualen und bieten Kurse zur Kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie bei Psychosen an.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klingberg, S., Hesse, K. Differenzialindikation für die Psychotherapie bei Psychosen. Nervenarzt 89, 276–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-017-0474-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-017-0474-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation