Skip to main content
Log in

Globalisierung in der medizinischen Forschung

Globalization in medical research

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Globalisierung der klinischen Forschung gewinnt zusehends an Dynamik. Insbesondere Schwellenländer wie Brasilien, Indien, Russland und China verzeichnen ein deutliches Wachstum bei klinischen Studien. Dieser Trend erzeugt unterschiedliche ethische Probleme, die wir im vorliegenden Artikel untersuchen werden. Teils werden allgemein akzeptierte ethische Regeln wie die Begutachtung von Studien durch Ethikkommissionen nicht eingehalten, teils entstehen schwer zu lösende Konfliktsituationen. Umstritten ist etwa, welchen Behandlungsstandard Forscher und Sponsoren bei internationalen Studien zur Verfügung stellen müssen. Erschwert werden diese Konflikte noch durch ein grundlegendes Dilemma: Mehr Forschung in Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländern zu den dort vorherrschenden Erkrankungen ist notwendig. Gleichzeitig stellt der Schutz der dortigen Studienteilnehmer eine besondere Herausforderung dar. Internationale Kommissionen und Richtlinien haben in den letzten Jahren deutliche Fortschritte erzielt, um diese Konflikte zu lösen. Dennoch muss die weitere Entwicklung sorgfältig untersucht werden. Anreize müssen geschaffen werden, um bisher vernachlässigte Erkrankungen besser zu erforschen. Fehlentwicklungen und Missbrauch müssen durch angemessene internationale ethische Standards verhindert werden.

Abstract

The globalization of clinical research is gaining momentum. In particular, emerging countries, such as Brazil, India, Russia and South Africa show a significant increase in clinical trials. This trend is generating various ethical problems, which are examined in the present article. Sometimes, generally accepted ethical rules, such as the evaluation of clinical trials by ethics commissions are not respected and sometimes conflicts are generated which are difficult to resolve. For instance, it is controversial which standard of care researchers and sponsors have to provide in an international study. These conflicts are exacerbated by a fundamental dilemma: more research on diseases prevalent in developing and emerging countries is necessary. At the same time, the protection of study participants in those countries creates particular challenges. In recent years, international commissions and guidelines have achieved significant progress in solving these conflicts; however, the further development has to be analyzed very carefully. Incentives for better research on neglected diseases have to be created. Undesirable developments and abuse have to be prevented by appropriate international ethical standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Atal I, Trinquart L, Porcher R et al (2015) Differential globalization of industry- and non-industry – sponsored clinical trials. PLoS ONE 10:e145122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Consultative Expert Working Group (2011) Report of the third meeting of the Consultative Expert working Group on research and development, financing and development: financing and coordination

    Google Scholar 

  3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (Cioms) (2016) International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans, 4. Aufl. Cioms, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General, USA (2003) The globalization of clinical trials: a growing challenge in protecting human subjects: executive summary (2001). J Int Bioethique 14:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emanuel EJ (2008) Benefits to host countries. In: Emanuel E, Grady C, Crouch R, Lie R, Miller F, Wendler D (Hrsg) The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, S 719–728

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong S, Sohn M, Kim JH et al (2017) Current globalization of drug interventional clinical trials: characteristics and associated factors. Trials 18(288):2011–2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lavery JV (2007) Ethical issues in international biomedical research: a casebook. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lie RK, Emanuel E, Grady C et al (2004) The standard of care debate: the declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion. J Med Ethics 30:190–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. London AJ (2007) Equipoise. In: Steinbock B (Hrsg) The Oxford handbook of bioethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. London AJ, Zollman KJ (2010) Research at the auction block. Hastings Cent Rep 40:34–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lurie P, Wolfe SM (1997) Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human Immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. N Engl J Med 337(12):853–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Macklin R (2004) Double standards in medical research in developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (2001) Ethical and policy issues in international research: clinical trials in developing countries, volume I: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2002) The ethics of clinical research in developing countries. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Participants in the Conference on Ethical Aspects of Research in Developing Countries (2004) Moral standards for research in developing countries: from „reasonable availability“ to „fair benefits“. Hastings Cent Rep 34:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petryna A (2009) When experiments travel: clinical trials and the global search for human subjects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Pogge TW (2005) Human Rights and Global Health. Metaphilosophy 36(1–2):182–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x

  18. Silva RED, Amato AA, Guilhem DB et al (2016) Globalization of clinical trials: ethical and regulatory implications. Int J Clin Trials 3:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission (2003) Opinion Nr 17 on the ethical aspects of clinical research in developing countries. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  20. Varmus H, Satcher D (1997) Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries. N Engl J Med 337:1003–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vidyasagar D (2006) Global notes: the 10/90 gap disparities in global health research. J Perinatol 26:55–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenner DM, Brody BA, Jarman AF et al (2012) Do surgical trials meet the scientific standards for clinical trials? J Am Coll Surg 215:722–730

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. World Medical Association (2013) WMA declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects

    Google Scholar 

  24. http://www.dgch.de/index.php?id=161. Zugegriffen: 03.08.2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Wiesing.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H.-J. Ehni und U. Wiesing geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehni, HJ., Wiesing, U. Globalisierung in der medizinischen Forschung. Chirurg 89, 178–184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-017-0570-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-017-0570-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation