Skip to main content
Log in

Retinopathy of prematurity screening by non-retinologists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To detect the screening efficiency of general ophthalmologists (ophthalmic residents) as well as nonophthalmologists (pediatric residents and nurses posted in neonatal intensive care unit) in screening (ROP) retinopathy of prematurity on the basis of posterior pole vascular changes.

Methods

Prospective consecutive review in a tertiary care hospital setting. Five groups (each, comprising of one ophthalmic resident, one pediatric resident and a nurse) examined the posterior pole vessels of 200 eyes of ROP with a direct ophthalmoscope and compared with an ROP specialist using indirect ophthalmoscope. SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science), version 10.0 was used for the analysis.

Results

Results

Ophthalmic residents findings were: (sensitivity 95.68%, specificity 92.85%, positive predictive value 94.81%, negative predictive value 93.97%; pediatric residents findings were: (sensitivity 92.24%, specificity 88.09%, positive predictive value 91.45%, negative predictive value 89.15%); and nurses, finding were: (sensitivity 88.79%, specificity 85.71%, positive predictive value 89.56%, and negative predictive value 84.70%). The results had no statistically significant difference in diagnostic reliability. Kappa agreement analysis was significant for ophthalmic residents (0.887), pediatric residents (0.805) and nurses (0.744) compared with the ROP specialist. None of the children diagnosed with pre-threshold or threshold ROP was thought to have normal posterior pole vessels by the trainees.

Conclusions

Given adequate training, general ophthalmologists and non-ophthalmologists (pediatricians and nurse practitioners) are independently reliable in detecting posterior pole changes in ROP babies using direct ophthalmoscope and can be provided with a screening protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bremer, Fellows RRet al. Strabismus in premature infants in the first year of life.Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 329–333.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity cooperative group. Multicenter trial of cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity: snellen activity and structural outcome at five and a half years.Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Keefe M, O’Reilly J, Lanigan B. Longer term visual outcome of eyes with retinopathy of prematurity treated with cryotherapy or diode laser.Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 1246–1248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsson E, Holmstrom G. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity: evaluation and modification of guidelines.Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 1399–1402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison RJ, Wild JM, Hobky. Referral patterns to an ophthalmic outpatient clinic by general practitioners and ophthalmic opticians and the role of these professionals in screening for ocular disease.BMJ 1957; 297: 1102–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andruscavage L, Weissgold DJ. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity.Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 1127–1130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz SD, Harrison SA, Ferrone PJ, Trese MT. Telemedical evaluation and management of retinopathy of prematurity using a fiberoptic digital fundus camera.Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 25–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhillon B, Wright E, Fleck BW. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity: are a lid speculum and scleral indentation necessary?J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1993; 30: 377–381.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saunders RA, Bluestein EC, Sinatra RB, Wilson ME, O’Neil JW, Rust PF. The predictive value of posterior pole vessels in retinopathy of prematurity.J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995; 32: 82–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saunders RA, Margaret LD, Berland JE, Roberts EL, Powers BV, Rust PF. Non-ophthalmologist screening for retinopathy of prematurity.Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 130–134.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saunders RA, Berland JE, Bluestein EC, Donahue ML, Wilson ME, Rust PF. Can non-ophthalmologists screen for retinopathy of prematurity?J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995; 32: 302–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harper R, Reeves B. The sensitivity and specificity of direct ophthalmoscopic optic disc assessment in screening for glaucoma: a multivariate analysis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238 (12): 949–955.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Faigen M. The early detection of glaucoma in general practice.Aust Fam Physician 2000; 29(3): 282–285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Vardhan Azad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azad, R.V., Manjunatha, N.P., Pal, N. et al. Retinopathy of prematurity screening by non-retinologists. Indian J Pediatr 73, 515–518 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02759897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02759897

Key words

Navigation