Abstract
Twenty experts on assertive community treatment (ACT) rated the importance of 73 program elements, also indicating ideal model specifications (e.g., minimum time commitment for psychiatrist) when appropriate. Interexpert agreement on ratings of importance was high (intraclassr=.94), although there was less agreement for some areas—for example, team structure (intraclassr=.70). Survey responses suggested several areas of increasing emphasis (e.g., vocational and addictions specialists) and of decreasing emphasis (e.g., the avoidance of office visits). Two subgroups of experts were identified—those who advocated large multidisciplinary teams (100 or more clients) and day and evening shifts, and those who advocated smaller, often generalist, teams (approximately 50 clients). Experts also reported ideal staffing for an ACT team. The most frequently identified disciplines were psychiatrist, nurse, and social worker. Implications for mental health policy—for example, quality assurance and program standards—are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stein LI, Test MA: An alternative to mental hospital treatment. I: Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation.Archives of General Psychiatry 1980; 37:392–397.
Test MA: Training in community living. In: Liberman RP (Ed.):Handbook of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. New York: MacMillan, 1992, pp. 153–170.
Witheridge TF: The “active ingredients” of an in vivo community support program.New Directions for Mental Health Services 1991; 52:47–64.
Thompson KS, Griffith E, Leaf PJ: A historical review of the Madison model of community care.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41:625–634.
Bond GR: Variations in an assertive outreach model.New Directions for Mental Health Services 1991; 52:65–80.
Test MA: Programs of Assertive Community Treatment: Twenty Years of Research. Paper presented at the NIMH-sponsored workshop, Building Social Work Knowledge for Effective Mental Health Services and Policies, Bethesda, MD, April, 1992.
Olfson M: Assertive community treatment: An evaluation of the experimental evidence.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41:634–641.
Solomon P: The efficacy of case management services for severely disabled clients.Community Mental Health Journal 1992; 28:163–180.
Taube CA, Morlock L, Burns B, et al.: New directions in research on assertive community treatment.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41:642–647.
Bickman L: The functions of program theory. In: Bickman L (Ed.):Using Program Theory in Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987, pp. 5–18.
McGrew JH, Bond GR, Dietzen L, et al.: Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994; 62:670–678.
National Institute of Mental Health: Programs of Assertive Community Treatment. National Institute of Mental Health-sponsored meeting, Rockville, MD, December, 1992.
Scott AG, Sechrest L: Strength of theory and theory of strength.Evaluation and Program Planning 1989; 12:329–336.
Hu T, Jerrell J: Cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches in treating severely mentally ill in California.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1991; 17:461–468.
Sechrest L, West RG, Phillips MA, et al.: Some neglected problems in evaluation and research: Strength and integrity of treatments. In: Sechrest L, West RG, Phillips MA, et al. (Eds.):Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979, pp. 15–35.
Wisconsin Administrative Code:HSS 63 Community Support Programs for Chronically Mentally Ill Persons. Madison: Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Community Services, 1989.
Bond GR, Miller LD, Krumwied RD, et al.: Assertive case management in three CMHCs: A controlled study.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988; 39:411–418.
Dixon WJ:BMDP statistical software. Rev. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
Levine M, Toro P, Perkins D: Social and community interventions.Annual Review of Psychology 1993; 44:525–558.
Diamond RJ, Wikler DI: Ethical problems in community treatment of the chronically mentally ill.New Directions for Mental Health Services 1985; 26:85–93.
Anthony W: Managed care: A misnomer?Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1993; 44:794–795.
Goeke DE: Effects of Client, Treatment, and Community Variables on Hospitalization of the Chronically Mentally Ill: An Ecological Perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1993.
Felner RD, Phillips RSC, DuBois D, et al.: Ecological interventions and the process of change for prevention: Wedding theory and research to implementation in real world settings.American Journal of Community Psychology 1991; 19:379–387.
Bachrach LL: The chronic patient: On exporting and importing model programs.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988; 39:1257–1258.
Palumbo DJ, Oliviero A: Implementation theory and the theory-driven approach to validity.Evaluation and Program Planning 1989; 12:337–344.
Brekke JS, Wolkon GH: Monitoring program implementation in community mental health settings.Evaluation and the Health Professions 1988; 11:425–440.
Clark RE, Fox TS: A framework for evaluating the economic impact of case management.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1993; 44:469–473.
Hu T, Jerrell J:Service Variations and Costs of Case Management for Severely Mentally Ill Clients. Working Paper No. 4-93. Berkeley, CA: Institute for Mental Health Services Research, 1993.
Jacobs DR, Moxley DP: Anticipating managed mental health care: Implications for psychosocial rehabilitation agencies.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1993; 17:15–31.
Weisbrod BA, Test MA, Stein LI: An alternative to mental hospital treatment II: Economic benefit-cost analysis.Archives of General Psychiatry 1980; 37:400–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGrew, J.H., Bond, G.R. Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment: Judgments of the experts. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 22, 113–125 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518752
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518752