Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular characterization ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato from Slovenia revealing significant differences between tick and human isolates

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred twenty-nine Slovenian isolates ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato derived from patients (69 strains) orIxodes ricinus ticks (60 strains) were characterized. All of the strains were first- or second-passage isolates obtained in 1992 and 1993 from the same endemic region. The techniques used for the molecular analysis of strains included species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoretic separation of undigested andMlul-digested genomic DNA. Isolates were identified to the species level by large restriction fragment pattern (LRFP) analysis and the results compared with the species-specific PCR result. Fifty-two patient isolates (75%) were typed asBorrelia afzelii (LRFP MLa1), 6 (9%) asBorrelia garinii (LRFPs MLg1–4), and 11 (16%) asBorrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto. The latter included 9 isolates (13%) with a new LRFP that is not typical ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto and for which the designation MLx is suggested. In contrast, only 32 of 60 (53%) tick isolates were typed asBorrelia afzelii, while 20 strains (33%) were typed asBorrelia garinii and 8 strains (13%) asBorrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto. Three new LRFPs were found among theBorrelia garinii (MLg5 and 6) andBorrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto (MLb15) tick isolates. Large restriction fragment pattern analysis identified new groups ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and revealed an apparent difference in the isolation frequency of different species from patients and ticks in the same endemic region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burgdorfer W, Barbour AG, Hayes SF, Benach JL, Grunwaldt E, Davis JP: Lyme disease — a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science 1982, 216: 1317–1319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson RC, Schmid GP, Hyde FW, Steigerwalt AG, Brenner DJ:Borrelia burgdorferi sp. nov.: etiological agent of Lyme disease. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1984, 34: 496–497.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Postic D, Edlinger C, Richaud C, Grimont F, Dufresene Y, Perolat P, Baranton G, Grimont PAD: Two genomic species inBorrelia burgdorferi. Research in Microbiology 1990, 141:465–475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stälhammar-Carlemalm M, Jenny E, Gern L, Aeschlimann A, Meyer J: Plasmid analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphisms of chromosomal DNA allow a distinction betweenBorrelia burgdorferi isolates. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene 1990, 274: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosa P, Hogan D, Schwan TG: Polymerase chain reaction identifies two distinct classes ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 524–532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam T, Graf B, Neubert U, Göbel UB: Detection and classification ofBorrelia burgdorferi by direct sequencing of 16S rRNA amplified after reverse transcription. Medical Microbiology Letters 1992, 1: 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baranton G, Postic D, Saint Girons I, Boerlin P, Piffaretti JC, Assous M, Grimont PAD: Delineation ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto,Borrelia garinii sp. nov., and group VS461 associated with Lyme borreliosis. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1992, 42: 378–383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boerlin P, Péter O, Bretz AG, Postic D, Baranton G, Piffaretti JC: Population genetic analysis ofBorrelia burgdorferi isolates by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Infection and Immunity 1992, 60: 1677–1683.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marconi RT, Garon CF: Phylogenetic analysis of the genusBorrelia: a comparison of North American and European isolates ofBorrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Bacteriology 1992, 174: 241–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marconi RT, Garon CF: Identification of a third genomic group ofBorrelia burgdorferi through signature nucleotide analysis and 16S rRNA sequence determination. Journal of General Microbiology 1992, 138: 533–536.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Picken RN: Polymerase chain reaction primers and probes derived from flagellin gene sequences for specific detection of the agents of Lyme disease and North American relapsing fever. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 99–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz JJ, Gazumyan A, Schwartz I: rRNA gene organization in the Lyme disease spirochete,Borrelia burgdorferi. Journal of Bacteriology 1992, 174: 3757–3765.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallich R, Schaible UE, Lobet Y, Moter SE, Kramer MD, Simon MM: Evaluation of genetic divergence amongBorrelia burgdorferi isolates by use ofospA, fla, HSP60, and HSP70 gene probes. Infection and Immunity 1992, 60: 4856–4866.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Welsh J, Pretzman C, Postic D, Saint Girons I, Baranton G, McClelland M: Genomic fingerprinting by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction resolvesBorrelia burgdorferi into three distinct phyletic groups. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1992, 42: 370–377.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ralph D, Postic D, Baranton G, Pretzman C, McClelland M: Species ofBorrelia distinguished by restriction site polymorphisms in 16S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1993, 111: 239–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Filipuzzi-Jenny E, Blot M, Schmid-Berger N, Meister-Turner J, Meyer J: Genetic diversity amongBorrelia burgdorferi isolates: more than three genospecies? Research in Microbiology 1993, 144: 295–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Postic D, Assous MV, Grimont PAD, Baranton G: Diversity ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato evidenced by restriction fragment length polymorphism of rrf(5S)-rrl(23S) intergenic spacer amplicons. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1994, 44: 743–752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Livens D, Gazumyan A, Schwartz I: Molecular typing ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 589–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marin Canica M, Nato F, du Merle L, Mazie JC, Baranton G, Postic D: Monoclonal antibodies for identification ofBorrelia afzelii sp. nov. associated with late cutaneous manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993, 25: 441–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Assous MV, Postic D, Paul G, Nevot P, Baranton G: Individualisation of two new genomic groups among AmericanB. burgdorferi sensu lato strains. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1994, 121: 93–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawabata H, Masuzawa T, Yanagihara Y: Genomic analysis ofBorrelia japonica sp. nov. isolated fromIxodes ovatus in Japan. Microbiology and Immunology 1993, 37: 843–848.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Postic D, Belfaiza J, Isogai E, Saint Girons I, Grimont PAD, Baranton G: A new genomic species inBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolated from Japanese ticks. Research in Microbiology 1993, 144: 467–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marconi RT, Liveris D, Schwartz I: Identification of novel insertion elements, restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns, and discontinuous 23S rRNA in Lyme disease spirochetes: phylogenetic analyses of rRNA genes and their intergenic spacers inBorrelia japonica sp. nov. and genomic group 21038 (Borrelia andersonii sp. nov.) isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 2427–2434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strle F, Cheng Y, Nelson JA, Picken MM, Bouseman JK, Picken RN: Infection rate ofIxodes ricinus ticks withBorrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, andBorrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1995, 14: 994–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Göbel UB, Graf B, Jauris S, Soutschek E, Schwab E, Zumstein G: An OspA serotyping system forBorrelia burgdorferi based on reactivity with monoclonal antibodies and OspA sequence analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 340–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Dam AP, Kuiper H, Vos K, Widjojokusumo A, de Jongh MB, Spanjaard L, Ramselaar ACP, Kramer MD, Dankert J: Different genospecies ofBorrelia burgdorferi are associated with distinct clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1993, 17: 708–717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Assous MV, Postic D, Paul G, Névot P, Baranton G: Western blot analysis of sera from Lyme borreliosis patients according to the genomic species of theBorrelia strains used as antigens. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1993, 12: 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Anthonissen FM, De Kesel M, Hoet PR, Bigaignon GH: Evidence for the involvement of different genospecies ofBorrelia in the clinical outcome of Lyme disease in Belgium. Research in Microbiology 1994, 145: 327–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Balmelli T, Piffaretti JC: Association between different clinical manifestations of Lyme disease and different species ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Research in Microbiology 1995, 146: 329–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Davidson B, MacDougall JH, Saint Girons I: Physical map of the linear chromosome of the bacteriumBorrelia burgdorferi 212, the causative agent of Lyme disease. Journal of Bacteriology 1992, 174: 3766–3774.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Belfaiza J, Postic D, Bellenger E, Baranton G, Saint, Girons I: Genomic fingerprinting ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 2873–2877.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Strle F, Cheng Y, Cimperman J, Maraspin V, Lotric-Furlan S, Nelson JA, Picken MM, Ruzic-Sabljic E, Picken RN: Persistence ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in resolved erythema migrans lesions. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1995, 21: 380–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuiper H, van Dam AP, Spanjaard L, de Jongh BM, Widjojokusumo A, Ramselaar TCP, Cairo I, Vos K, Dankert J: Isolationof Borrelia burgdorferi from biopsy specimens taken from healthy-looking skin of patients with Lyme borreliosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 715–720.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Picken RN, Cheng Y, Han D, Nelson JA, Reddy AG, Hayden MK, Picken MM, Strle F, Bouseman JK, Trenholme GM: Genotypic and phenotypic characterization ofBorrelia burgdorferi isolated from ticks and small animals in Illinois. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 2304–2315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marconi RT, Konkel ME, Garon CF: Variability ofosp genes and gene products among species of Lyme disease spirochetes. Infection and Immunity 1993, 61: 2611–2617.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Steere AC, Hutchinson GH, Rahn DWA, Sigal LH, Kraft GE, DeSanna ET, Malawista SE: Treatment of the early manifestations of Lyme disease. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983, 99:22–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Norton Hughes CA, Kodner CB, Johnson RC: DNA analysis ofBorrelia burgdorferi NCH-1, the first northcentral U.S. human Lyme disease isolate. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 698–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Demaerschalck I, Messaoud AB, De Kesel M, Hoyois B, Lobet Y, Hoet P, Bigaignon G, Bollen A, Godfroid E: Simultaneous presence of differentBorrelia burgdorferi genospecies in biological fluids of Lyme disease patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 602–608.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picken, R.N., Cheng, Y., Strle, F. et al. Molecular characterization ofBorrelia burgdorferi sensu lato from Slovenia revealing significant differences between tick and human isolates. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 313–323 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01695664

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01695664

Keywords

Navigation