Skip to main content
Log in

Rates of trisomies 21, 18, 13 and other chromosome abnormalities in about 20 000 prenatal studies compared with estimated rates in live births

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

Data were analyzed on the results of 19675 prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses reported to two chromosome registries on women aged 35 or over for whom there was no known cytogenetic risk for a chromosome abnormality except parental age. The expected rates at amniocentesis of 47,+21; 47,+18; 47,+13; XXX; XXY; XYY; and other clinically significant cytogenetic defects by maternal age were obtained from a regression analysis on the observed rates, using a first degree exponential model. After an adjustment for maternal age, these rates were compared with previously estimated rates by maternal age in live births. The rates of 47,+21 at amniocentesis and live birth are approximately parallel, with the latter about 80% of the amniocentesis rates. The rates of 47,+18 at amniocentesis and live birth are approximately parallel, with the live birth rates about 30% of the amniocentesis rates, consistent with high fetal mortality of 47,+18 after amniocentesis. The rates of 47,+13 at amniocentesis indicate an increase in maternal age that is not as marked as thar previously estimated in live births. The rates at amniocentesis for XXX and XXY increase with maternal age, with the rates of XXY almost identical to those estimated previously in live births, suggesting no late fetal mortality of XXY. The rates of XYY show a slight decrease with maternal age also consistent with little late fetal mortality of XYY. No consistent trend with age is seen for the pooled group of other clinically significant defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carothers AD, Collyer S, DeMey R, Frackiewicz A (1978) Parental age and birth order in the aetiology of some sex chromosome aneuploidies. Ann Hum Genet 41:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson-Smith MA (1979) Maternal age specific incidence of chromosome aberrations at amniocentesis. In: Murken JD, Stengel-Rutkowski S, Schwinger S (eds) Prenatal diagnosis. F Enke, Stuttgart, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JA, Hunter AGW, Hamerton JL (1978) Down's syndrome and recent demographic trends in Manitoba. J Med Genet 15:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley, New York, pp 173–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB (1978) Differences between rates of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed in livebirths and in cells cultured after second-trimester amniocentesis—Suggested explanations and implications for genetic counseling and program planning. Birth Defects 14 (6C):249–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB (1980) Rates of 47,+13 and 46 translocation D/13 Patau syndrome in live births and comparison with rates in fetal deaths and at amniocentesis. Am J Hum Genet 32:849–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB (1981) Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol 58:282–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Cross PK (1981) Temporal changes in livebirth prevalence of Down's syndrome in New York State. J Med Genet 18:29–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Woodbury DF, Albright SG (1979) Rates of trisomy 18 in livebirths, stillbirths, and at amniocentesis. Birth Defects 15 (5 C): 81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook EB, Cross PK, Schreinemachers D (1981) The evolution of the New York State Chromosome Registry. In: Hook EB, Porter IH (eds) Population and biological aspects of human mutations. Academic Press, New York, pp 389–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Magenis RE, Hecht F, Milham S Jr (1968) Trisomy 13 (D1) syndrome: Studies on parental age, sex ratio and survival. J Pediat 73:222–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteleone PL, Anderson R, Chen S-C, Nouri S, Monteleone JA, Taysi K (1981) A demographic study of trisomy 13. Pediatr Res 15:565

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD National Registry for Amniocentesis Study Group (1976) Midtrimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis—Safety and accuracy. JAMA 236:1471–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard JH (1977) Numerical and statistical techniques. Cambridge Univ Press, England, pp 18–25, 211–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott GH, Rivas ML, Shanbeck L, Macfarlane DW, Wyandt HE, Breg WR, Lubs HA, Magenis RE, Summitt RL, Palmer CG, Hecht F, Kimberling W, Clow D (1978) The Interregional Cytogenetic Register System (ICRS). Birth Defects 14 (6 C):269–279

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schreinemachers, D.M., Cross, P.K. & Hook, E.B. Rates of trisomies 21, 18, 13 and other chromosome abnormalities in about 20 000 prenatal studies compared with estimated rates in live births. Hum Genet 61, 318–324 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276595

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276595

Keywords

Navigation