Skip to main content
Log in

MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

The purpose of this study was to determine the magnetic resonance (MR) features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods:

MR imaging studies of seven cases of pathologically proven intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed.

Results:

On MR images the tumors presented as a single mass (N = 5) or multiple nodules (N = 2), as welldelineated (N = 5) or ill-defined (N = 2), and as non-encapsulated (N = 7). Mean tumor diameter ranged from 6–14 cm (mean, 10 cm). On T1-weighted (TR/TE = 400–600/10–17 msec) images, the tumors were hypointense compared to the liver. The five tumors studied with dynamic MR imaging showed progressive centripetal filling-in after intravenous administration of a gadolinium chelate. On T2-weighted (TR/TE = 2000–2500/80–100 msec) images, all tumors were hyperintense compared to the liver; five were markedly hyperintense and two moderately hyperintense. Vascular encasement, bile duct dilatation within the tumor, and central scar were depicted on MR images in four, three, and two tumors respectively.

Conclusion:

The typical MR appearance of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a large well-delineated nonencapsulated tumor associated with intrahepatic venous encasement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sugihara S, Kojiro M. Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. In: Nakashima T, Kojiro M, eds. Hepatocellular carcinoma. An atlas of its pathology. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ros PR, Buck JL, Goodman ZD, Ros AMV, Olmsted WW. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1988;167:689–693

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi BI, Park JH, Kim YI, et al. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma and clonorchiasis: CT findings. Radiology 1988;169:149–153

    Google Scholar 

  4. Itai Y, Araki T, Furui S, Yashiro N, Ohtomo K, Iio M. Computed tomography of primary intrahepatic biliary malignancy. Radiology 1983;147:485–490

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tani K, Kubota Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. MR imaging of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:975–978

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan ZM, Yamashita Y, Harada M, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1993;161:313–317

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamrick-Turner J, Abbitt PL, Ros PR. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: MR appearance. AJR 1992;158:77–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rummeny E, Weissleder R, Sironi S, et al. Central scars in primary liver tumors: MR feature, specificity, and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;171:323–326

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahfouz AE, Hamm B, Taupitz M, Wolf KJ. Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida H, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Minami M, Yashiro N. Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989;171:339–342

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edmondson HA, Peters RL. Neoplasms of the liver. In: Schiff L, Schiff ER, eds. Diseases of the liver. Philadelphia: Lippincot. 1982:1102–1112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Furui S, Itai Y, Ohtomo K, et al. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: report of five cases. Radiology 1989;171:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Beers B, Roche A, Mathieu D, et al. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: MR and CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:420–424

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller WJ, Dodd GD III, Federle MP, Baron RL. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver: imaging findings with pathologic correlation. AJR 1992;159:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Vissuzaine C, Van Beers B, Barge J, Levesque M. CT of hepatic tumors: prevalence and specificity of retraction of the adjacent liver capsule. AJR 1994;162:1119–1122

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okuda K, Kubo Y, Okazaki N, et al. Clinical aspects of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma including hilar carcinoma: a study of 57 autopsy-proven cases. Cancer 1977;39:232–246

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freeny PC, Baron RL, Teefy SA. Hepatocellular carcinoma: reduced frequency of typical findings with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in a non-Asian population. Radiology 1992;182:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stain SC, Baer HU, Dennison AR, Blumgart LH. Current management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:579–588

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bengmark S, Blumgart LH, Launois B. Liver resection in high bile duct tumors. In: Bengmark S, Blumgart LH, eds. Liver surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Kanazawa S, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S. Parenchymal changes of the liver in cholangiocarcinoma: CT evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:161–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soyer, P., Bluemke, D.A., Sibert, A. et al. MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 20, 126–130 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201519

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201519

Key words

Navigation