Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography

  • Original Article
  • Urogenital Radiology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of the fast imaging sequence called RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement) MR urography (or RMU) In pregnant women with painful ureterohydronephrosis. A total of 17 pregnant women with an acute flank pain were examined with RMU. Results were compared with those of US, X-rays and the evolution of symptoms. The gold standard techniques used to evaluate the results of MR urography were US when it showed the entire dilated urinary tract and the nature of the obstruction (9 cases), limited intravenous urography (IVU) when performed (3 cases) or endoscopic procedure (5 cases). The accuracy of RMU in the detection of urinary tract dilatation and the localization of the level of obstruction was excellent (sensitivity 100% in our series). The determination of the type of obstruction, intrinsic vs extrinsic, was always exact. The RMU technique alone could not specify the exact nature of the obstruction. The RMU technique is able to differentiate a physiological from a pathological ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy. It could be considered as the procedure of choice when US failed to establish the differential diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swartz HM, Reichling BA (1978) Hazards of radiation exposure for pregnant women. JAMA 239: 1907–1911.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Webb JAW (1990) Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal obstruction. Sensitive but not very specific. Br Med J 301: 944–946.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H (1986) RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 3: 823–833.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henning J, Friedburg H, Strobel B (1986) Rapid nontomographic approach to MR-myelography without contrast agents. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10: 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roy C, Saussine C, Jahn C, Vinee Ph, Beaujeux R, Campos M, Gounot D, Chambron J (1994) Evaluation of RARE-MR-urography in the assessment of ureterohydronephrosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18: 601–608.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henning J, Friedburg H (1988) Clinical applications and methodological developments of the RARE technique. Magn Reson Imaging 6: 391–395.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vinee Ph, Stover B, Sigmund G et al. (1992) MR imaging of pericardial cyst. J Med Reson Imaging 2: 593–596.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sigmund G, Stover B, Zimmerhackl LB et al. (1991) RARE-MR-urography in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract abnormalities in children. Pediatr Radiol 21: 416–420.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sigmund G, Stover B, Zimmerhackl LB et al. (1991) Cystic diseases of the kidney in children: MRI, including RARE-MR-urography. Eur Radiol 1: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waltzer WC (1981) The urinary tract in pregnancy. J Urol 125: 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peake SL, Rowburgh HB, Le Planglois S (1983) Ultrasonic assessment of hydronephrosis in pregnancy. Radiology 146: 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horowitz E, Schmidt JD (1985) Renal calculi in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 128: 324–328.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stothers L, Lee LM (1992) Renal colic in pregnancy. J Urol 148: 1383–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webb JAW (1990) Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal obstruction. Sensitive but not very specific. Br Med J 301: 944–946.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beers GJ (1988) Biological effects of weak electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 200 MHz: a survey of the literature with special emphasis on possible magnetic resonance effect. Magn Reson Imaging 7: 309–331.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz J, Crooks LE (1982) NMR imaging procedures: no observable mutations or cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. AJR 139: 583–586.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cronan JJ (1991) Contemporary concepts in imaging urinary tract obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am 29: 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Erickson LM, Nicholson SF, Lewall DB, Frischke L (1979) Ultrasound evaluation of hydronephrosis pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 7: 128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fried AM (1979) Hydronephrosis of pregnancy: ultrasonographic study and classification of asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135: 1066–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hill MC, Rick JI, Mardiat JG, Finder CA (1985) Sonography vs excretory urography in acute flank pain. AJR 144: 1235–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McNeily AE, Goldenberg SL, Allen GJ, Ajzen SA, Cooperberg PL (1991) Sonographic visualization of the ureter in pregnancy. J Urol 146: 298–301.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH (1993) Acute renal obstruction: evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional US. Radiology 186: 685–688.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burge JJ, Middleton WD, McClennan BL, Hildebolt CF (1991) Ureteral jets in healthy subjects and in patients with unilateral ureteral calculi: comparison with color Doppler US. Radiology 180: 442–473.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Takehara Y, Ichhijo, Tooyama N et al. (1994) Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis. Radiology 192: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rothpearl A, Frager D, Subramanian A et al. (1995) MR urography: technique and application. Radiology 194: 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: C. Roy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, C., Saussine, C., Le Bras, Y. et al. Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography. Eur. Radiol. 6, 334–338 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180604

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00180604

Key words

Navigation