Skip to main content

The Role of MRI in GERD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Dynamic MR fluoroscopy is a promising non-invasive method with which to evaluate the anatomy and function of the GEJ in GERD patients as well as in patients after Nissen fundoplication. Morphologic problems as well as functional problems like motility disorders can be confidently visualized with MR fluoroscopy pre-and postoperatively. Different imaging features can be described to identify postoperative failures after LARS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Gordon C, Kang JY, Neild PJ, et al. The role of hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;20:719–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leite LP, Johnston BT, Barrett J, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): The primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:1859–65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Streets CG, DeMeester TR. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: why, when and what to do. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37:14–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahrilas PJ. Beyond the motor elements of swallow. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:879–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Herwaarden MA, Samsom M, Smout AJ. The role of hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:831–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright RA, Hurwitz AL. Relationship of hiatal hernia to endoscopically proved reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1979;24:311–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang S, Joseph AA, Gross L, Ghadimi M, Frahm J, Beham AW. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using real-time magnetic resonce imaging. Sci Rep. 2015;15(5):12112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson JK, Kohler RE, Richter JE. Detection of gastroesophageal reflux: value of barium studies compared with 24-hr pH monitoring. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(3):621–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crawley MT, Savage P, Oakley F. Patient and operator dose during fluoroscopic examination of swallow mechanism. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:654–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barkhausen J, Goyen M, von Winterfeld F, Lauenstein T, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Debatin JF. Visualization of swallowing using real-time TrueFISP MR fluoroscopy. Eur Rad. 2002;12:129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Curcic J, Fox M, Kaufman E, Forras-Kaufman Z, et al. Gastroesophageal junction: structure and function as assessed by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2010;257:115–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartl DM, Kolb F, Bretagne E, Marandas P, Sigal R. Cine magnetic resonance imaging with single-shot fast spin echo for evaluation of dysphagia and aspiration. Dysphagia. 2006;21:156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Panebianco V, Tomei E, Anzidei M, et al. Functional MRI in the evaluation of oesophageal motility: feasibility, MRI patterns of normality, and preliminary experience in subjects with motility disorders. Radiol Med. 2006;111:881–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulinna-Cosentini C, Schima W, Lenglinger J, et al. Is there a role for dynamic swallowing MRI in the assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and oesophageal motility disorders? Eur Radiol. 2012;22:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulinna-Cosentini C, Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Cosentini EP. MRI patterns of Nissen fundoplication: normal appearance and mechanisms of failure. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(9):2137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manabe T, Kawamitsu H, Higashino T, et al. Observation of gastro-esophageal reflux by MRI: a feasibility study. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:419–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Panebianco V, Francioni F, Anzidei M, Anile M, Rolla M, Pasariello R. Magnetic resonance-fluoroscopy as longterm follow-up examination in patients with narrow gastric tube reconstruction after radical esophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:663–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tack J. Gastric motor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21:633–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quigley EM. Bacteria: a new player in gastrointestinal motility disorders–infections, bacterial overgrowth, and probiotics. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:735–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulinna-Cosentini C, Schima W, Cosentini EP. Dynamic MR imaging of the gastroesophageal junction in healthy volunteers during bolus passage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:749–54.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berstad A, Weberg R, Froyshov Larsen I, et al. Relationship of hiatus hernia to reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986;21:55–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen H, Johannessen T, Sandvik AK, et al. Relationship between endoscopic hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991;26:921–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones MP, Sloan SS, Jovanovic B, et al. Impaired egress rather than increased access: an important independent predictor of erosive oesophagitis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:625–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron AJ. Barrett’s esophagus: prevalance and size of hiatal hernia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2054–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chow WH, Finkle WD, McLaughin JK, et al. The relation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA. 1995;274:474–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill LD, et al. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:541–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahrilas PJ, et al. Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:897–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hogan BA, Winter DC, Broe D, Broe P, Lee MJ. Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(3):767–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wehrli NE, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Katzka DA, Laufer I. Secondary achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1464–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Covotta F, Piretta L, Badiali D, Laghi A, Biondi T, Corazziari ES, Panebianco V. Functional magentic resonce in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;2011:5. Article ID 367639. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/36763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kulinna-Cosentini, C. (2018). The Role of MRI in GERD. In: Memon, M. (eds) Hiatal Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64003-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64003-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64002-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64003-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics