Skip to main content

Historical Insights of Psychosomatic Medicine in Heidelberg

  • Conference paper
Book cover Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

At Heidelberg, psychotherapy and psychosomatic medicine established themselves earlier than elsewhere. As early as 1929 Viktor von Weizsäcker (1886–1957) succeeded in setting up a ward for neurotics at the Medical Clinic, thus taking a step toward psychosomatics in the midst of a place that was a mecca of the internal medicine of the time. This ward for neurotics in the later Krehl-Clinic was carried on into the years of war till 1943. In the post-war period three important institutions of psychosomatics came into being:

  1. 1.

    the Department of General Clinical Medicine, which started operating in November 1945, with Weizsäcker as the director and its emphasis on internal psychosomatics;

  2. 2.

    the Institute of Psychotherapy, which, founded in 1949 and initially integrated in Weizsäckers department, became independent after Weizsäcker’s retirement and was renamed ‘Psychosomatic Clinic’ in 1954;

  3. 3.

    The Society for Educational Help, which founded in 1949, advocated psychoanalysis in children and completed, for the time being, the ensemble of psychotherapeutic institutions at Heidelberg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Seidler, Entwicklung naturwissenschaftlichen Denkens in der Medizin zur Zeit der Heidelberger Romantik, Surihoffs Archiv 47:43 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. v. Engelhardt, Naturphilosophie im Urteil der ‘Heidelberger Jahrbücher der Literatur’ 1808–1832. Heidelberger Jahrbücher 19:3 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Ehrenberg, “Kritik der Psychologie als Wissenschaft”, Thieme-Verlag Leipzig (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. v. Weizsäcker, Gesammelte Schriften, Bd.I, Suhrkamp-Verlag, Frankfurt (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Henkelmann, Zur Geschichte der Heidelberger Medizinischen .Klinik im 19. Jahrhundert, Heidelberger Jahrbücher 29:53 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Henkelmann, Die medizinische Klinik im 19. Jahrhundert, in: “Semper Apertus. Sechshundert Jahre Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg 1386–1986. Festschrift in sechs Banden”, Vol.2, Springer, Heidelberg -New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Erb, “Über die neuere Entwicklung der Nervenpathologie und ihre Bedeutung für den medizinischen Unterricht,” Thieme-Verlag, Leipzig (1880).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Erb, “Über die wachsende Nervosität unserer Zeit”, Wintersehe Universitätsbuchhandlung, Heidelberg (1894).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Friedreich, Zur Behandlung der Hysterie, Virchows Archiv 90:220 (1882).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. v. Krehl, “Entstehung , Erkennung und Behandlung innerer Krankheiten”, 3 Volumes, Thieme-Verlag, Leipzig (1930–33). (13. Aufl. des Grundriss’ der allgemeinen klinischen Pathologie, Leipzig 1898).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. v. Krehl, Über die Entstehung hysterischer Erscheinungen, Volkmanns klinische Beiträge 28:727 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.-H. Bloching, “J. F. Fries” Philosophie als Theorie der Subjektivität Diss. phil., Münster (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Akbar, “Jacob Friedrich Fries und die anthropologische Begründung einer rationalen Psychiatrie”, Diss.med.,Berlin (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Meyerhof, “Über Goethes Methode der Naturforschung”, Göttingen (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. Meyerhof, “Beitrage zur psychologischen Theorie der Geistesstörungen”, Göttingen (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.-G. Schweiger, Otto Meyerhof 1884–1951, in:”Semper Apertus. Sechshundert Jahre Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg 1386–1986”. Festschrift in sechs Bänden, Vol.3, Springer, Heidelberg-New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. G. Eliasberg, Early criticism of Freud’s psychoanalysis, Psychoanalytic Review, 41:347 (1954).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Henlœlmann, “Viktor von Weizsäcker (1886–1957). Materialien zu Leben und Werk”, Springer, Heidelberg-New York (1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Henkelmann, T., Hahn, P. (1987). Historical Insights of Psychosomatic Medicine in Heidelberg. In: Christodoulou, G.N. (eds) Psychosomatic Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5454-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5454-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5456-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5454-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics