Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

TASER® Conducted Electrical Weapons: Physiology, Pathology, and Law pp 283–300Cite as

Field Statistics Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

We now have enough years of experience and enough CEW deployments to answer many of the common statistical questions that arise. This chapter will deal with the following questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    * Mark W. Kroll reports serving on the Corporate and Scientific/Medical Advisory Board of TASER International, Inc. and receives compensation in both roles. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this chapter was reported. University of Minnesota

References

  1. Smith R. TASER® Non-LETHAL WEAPONS: Safety Data and Field Results. Paper presented at: American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. White M, Ready J. The TASER as a less lethal force alternative. findings on use and effectiveness in a large metropolitan police agency. Police Quarterly. March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bozeman W, Winslow J, Hauda W, et al. Injury Profile of TASER® electrical Conducted Energy Weapons (CEWs). Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2007;50:S65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eastman AL, Metzger JC, Pepe PE, et al. Conductive electrical devices: a prospective, population-based study of the medical safety of law enforcement use. The Journal of Trauma. Jun 2008;64(6):1567–1572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Czarnecki F. Recommendations for the Use of the TASER by Law Enforcement Officers. 2005 International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference, Legal Officers Section. Miami Beach, FL; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous. Multiple RCMP Taser Zaps on Rise Despite Warning: Canadian Press-CBC Analysis. Canadian Press. June 11 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dawes D, Johnson M, Lundin E, et al. Breathing Parameters, Venous Blood Gases, and Serum Chemistries With Exposure to a New Wireless Projectile Conducted Electrical Weapon in Human Volunteers. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2007;50:S133.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes E, Kennett M, Murray W, et al. Electro-Muscular Disruption (EMD) Bioeffects: A Study on the Effects a Continuous Application of the TASER@X26 Waveform on Swine. Philadelphia, PA: Penn State University; 30 November 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mumola C. Arrest-Related Deaths in the United States, 2003–2005. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report October 2007(NCJ 219534).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ho J, Reardon R, Heegaard W. Deaths in police custody: an 8 month surveillance study. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2005;46(suppl) abstract:S94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stratton SJ, Rogers C, Brickett K, et al. Factors associated with sudden death of individuals requiring restraint for excited delirium. Am J Emerg Med. May 2001;19(3):187–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Amnesty I. United States of America: Excessive and Lethal Force ? Amnesty International’s concerns about deaths and ill-treatment involving police use of TASERs. 2004:https://web.amnsety.org/library/index/ENGAMR511392004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ACLU. Pepper Spray: A Magic Bullet Under Scrutiny. ACLU of Southern California; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. TASER International & City of Akron v Chief Medical Examiner of Sunnit County, Ohio. Schneiderman: Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Ohio; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Comstock RD, Mallonee S, Jordan F. A comparison of two surveillance systems for deaths related to violent injury. Inj Prev. Feb 2005;11(1):58–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. deJong JL, Hanzlick R. Level of agreement between opinions of medical examiner investigators and forensic pathologist medical examiners regarding the manner of death. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. Mar 2000;21(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanzlick R. Quality assurance review of death certificates: a pilot study. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. Mar 2005;26(1):63–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O'Carroll PW. A consideration of the validity and reliability of suicide mortality data. Suicide Life Threat Behav. Spring 1989;19(1):1–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, Nakhleh R, Coffin C, et al. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Hum Pathol. Aug 2006;37(8):985–988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chandramohan D, Setel P, Quigley M. Effect of misclassification of causes of death in verbal autopsy: can it be adjusted? Int J Epidemiol. Jun 2001;30(3):509–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mollo F, Bertoldo E, Grandi G, et al. Reliability of death certifications for different types of cancer. An autopsy survey. Pathol Res Pract. Aug 1986;181(4):442–447.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Colonna M, Caruso G, Nardulli F, et al. Myocardial haemorrhagic necrosis in delayed death from electrocution. Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege). 1989;39(1):145–147.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lichtenberg R, Dries D, Ward K, et al. Cardiovascular effects of lightning strikes. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 1993;21(2):531–536.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Antoni H. Pathophysiological basis of ventricular fibrillation. In: Bridges JF, Ford GL, Sherman IA, et al., eds. Electrical Shock Safety Criteria. New York: Pergammon Press; 1985:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Antoni H. Cardiac sensitivity to electrical stimulation. In: Reilly J, ed. Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electrical Pathology. Springer; 1998:194–239.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Biegelmeier. Effect of Current Passing Through the Human Body and the Electrical Impedance of the Human Body: A guide to IEC-Report 469. VDE,-Verlag, Berlin: ETZ; 1987. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Biegelmeier G, Lee WR. New considerations on the threshold of ventricular fibrillation for a.c.shocks at 50˜60 Hz. IEE Proc. 1980;127(2):Pt. A: 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobsen J, Buntenkotter S, Reinhard HJ. [Experimental studies in pigs on mortality due to sinusoidal and phase-controlled alternating and rectified currents (author's transl)]. Biomed Tech (Berl). Jun 1975;20(3):99–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roy OZ, Park GC, Scott JR. Intracardiac catheter fibrillation thresholds as a function of the duration of 60 Hz current and electrode area. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1977;BME-24(5):430–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma AD, Fain E, O'Neill PG, et al. Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Jan 2004;27(1):89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Swerdlow CD, Olson WH, O'Connor ME, et al. Cardiovascular collapse caused by electrocardiographically silent 60-Hz intracardiac leakage current. Implications for electrical safety. Circulation. May 18 1999;99(19):2559–2564.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Weismuller P, Richter P, Binner L, et al. Direct current application: easy induction of ventricular fibrillation for the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15(8):1137–1143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kroll M, Tchou P. Testing of implantable defibrillator functions at implantation. In: Ellenbogen K, Kay G, Lau C, et al., eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2006:531–557.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Singer I, Lang D. The defibrillation threshold. In: Kroll M, Lehmann M, eds. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy: The Engineering-Clinical Interface. Boston: Kluwer; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frame R, Brodman R, Furman S, et al. Clinical evaluation of the safety of repetitive intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. Jun 1992;15(6):870–877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Swerdlow C, Kroll M, Williams H, et al. Presenting Rhythm in Sudden Custodial Deaths After Use of TASER® Electronic Control Device. Heart Rhythm May 2008;5(5):S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schipke JD, Heusch G, Sanii AP, et al. Static filling pressure in patients during induced ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. Dec 2003;285(6):H2510–H2515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Frame R, Brodman R, Furman S, et al. Clinical evaluation of the safety of repetitive intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15(6):870–877.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. IEC. Effects of Current on Human Beings and Livestock, CEI/IEC 479-2: Effects of currents passing through the human body, 2nd ed: IEC, Geneva, Switzerland; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  40. IEC. Effects of Current on Human Beings and Livestock, CEI/IEC 479-1: General Aspects, 3nd ed: IEC, Geneva, Switzerland; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chilbert M. Standards and rationale. In: Reilly J, ed. Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electrical Pathology. New York: Springer; 1998:454–501.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ferris LP, King BG, Spence PW, et al. Effect of electric shock on the heart. Electrical Eng. 1936;55:498–515.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nanthakumar K, Billingsley IM, Masse S, et al. Cardiac electrophysiological consequences of neuromuscular incapacitating device discharges. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 15 2006;48(4):798–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Geddes LA, Voorhees WD, Lagler R, et al. Electrically produced artificial ventilation. Med Instrum. Oct 1988;22(5):263–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vilke GM, Sloane CM, Bouton KD, et al. Physiological effects of a conducted electrical weapon on human subjects. Ann Emerg Med. Nov 2007;50(5):569–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Bultman LL, et al. Respiratory effect of prolonged electrical weapon application on human volunteers. Acad Emerg Med. Feb 5 2007;14:197–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chan T, Sloane C, Neuman T, et al. The impact of the taser weapon on respiratory and ventilatory function in human subjects. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:191–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ho J, Lapine A, Joing S. Confirmation of respiration during trapezial conducted electrical weapon application. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mitrani RD, Miles WM, Klein LS, et al. Phenylephrine increases T wave shock energy required to induce ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Jan 1998;9(1):34–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Inoue H, Saihara S, Toda I, et al. Summation and inhibition by ultrarapid train pulses in dogs: effects of frequency and duration of trains, lidocaine, and beta blockade. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989;12(11):1777–1786.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schwartz AB, Boyle W, Janzen D, et al. Acute effects of cocaine on catecholamines and cardiac electrophysiology in the conscious dog. Can J Cardiol. May 1988;4(4):188–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Schwartz AB, Janzen D, Jones RT. Electrophysiologic effects of cocaine on the canine ventricle. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. Feb 1989;13(2):253–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Tisdale JE, Shimoyama H, Sabbah HN, et al. The effect of cocaine on Ventricular fibrillation threshold in the normal canine heart. Pharmacotherapy. May–Jun 1996;16(3):429–437.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lakkireddy D, Wallick D, Ryschon K, et al. Effects of cocaine intoxication on the threshold for stun gun induction of ventricular fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 15 2006;48(4):805–811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kroll M, Panescu D, Ho J, et al. Potential Errors in Autopsy Reports of Custodial Deaths Temporally Associated With Electronic Control Devices: A Cardiovascular Prospective. Proceedings of American Academy of Forensic Sciences. San Antonio, TX, 2007:284–285.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ho J, Reardon R, Heegaard W. Deaths in Police Custody: a 12 Month Surveillance Study. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vilke GM, Sloane C, Levine S, et al. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram monitoring of subjects before and after voluntary exposure to the Taser X26. Am J Emerg Med. Jan 2008;26(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mesloh C, Wolf R, Henych M, et al. Less lethal weapons for law enforcement: A performance-based analysis. Law Enforcement Executive Forum. 2008;8(1):133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tchou P, Lakkireddy D, Wallick D. Effects of Torso Dart Position and Cocaine Intoxication on TASER® Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation. Paper presented at: American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Annual Meeting 2007; San Antonio, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sloane C, Vilke G, Chan T, et al. Serum Troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26. J Acad Emerg Med. 2008;35:29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Panescu D. Design and medical safety of neuromuscular incapacitation devices. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. Sep–Oct 2007;26(5):57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Panescu D. Less-than-lethal weapons: Design and Medical Safety of Neuromuscular Incapacitation Devices. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. July/August 2007;26(4).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Moscati R, Ho J, Dawes D, et al. Physiologic Effects of Prolonged Conducted Electrical Weapon Discharge on Intoxicated Adults. Society of Academic Emergency Medicine abstract issue. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Levine SD, Sloane CM, Chan TC, et al. Cardiac monitoring of human subjects exposed to the Taser. J Emerg Med. Aug 2007;33(2):113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lakkireddy D, Khasnis A, Antenacci J, et al. Do electrical stun guns (TASER-X26(R)) affect the functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators? Europace. Jul 2007;9(7):551–556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kroll MW, Calkins H, Luceri RM. Electronic control devices and the clinical milieu. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 13 2007;49(6):732; author reply 732–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kroll M, Luceri RM, Calkins H. A very interesting case study involving a TASER Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) used on a patient with a pacemaker. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Dec 2007;18(12):E29–E30; author reply E31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kroll M. Potential Autopsy Errors with In-Custody-Deaths: The Ronald Hasse Case Study Institute for the Prevention of In-Custody-Death. http://www.ipicd.com/docs/Hasse_Case_Study.pdf. 2007.

  69. Kroll M. Crafting the Perfect Shock. IEEE Spectrum. Dec 2007;44(12):27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ideker RE, Dosdall DJ. Can the direct cardiac effects of the electric pulses generated by the TASER X26 cause immediate or delayed sudden cardiac arrest in normal adults? Am J Forensic Med Pathol. Sep 2007;28(3):195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Holden SJ, Sheridan RD, Coffey TJ, et al. Electromagnetic modelling of current flow in the heart from TASER devices and the risk of cardiac dysrhythmias. Phys Med Biol. Dec 21 2007;52(24):7193–7209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ho JD, Dawes DM, Reardon RF, et al. Echocardiographic Evaluation of a TASER-X26 Application in the Ideal Human Cardiac Axis. Acad Emerg Med 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ho J, Dawes D, Johnson M, et al. The Neuroendocrine Effects of the TASER X26 Conducted Electrical Weapon as Compared to Oleoresin Capsicum. American College of Emergency Physicians Annual MeetingOct 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ho J. Physiologic effects of prolonged conducted electrical weapon discharge on acidotic adults. SAEM. 2007(abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ho J. Absence of electrocardiographic change following prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults. SAEM. 2007(abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Dawes DM, Ho JD, Johnson MA, et al. 15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;176:253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Cao M, Shinbane JS, Gillberg JM, et al. Taser-induced rapid ventricular myocardial capture demonstrated by pacemaker intracardiac electrograms. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. Aug 2007;18(8):876–879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Bouton KD, Vilke GM, Chan TC, et al. Physiological Effects of a Five Second Taser Exposure: 1897: Board #185 May 31 8:00 AM–9:30 AM. Med Sci Sports Exerc. May 2007;39(5 Suppl):S323.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Sweeney J, Kroll M, Panescu D. Analysis of Electrical Activation of Nerve and Muscle by TASERs. Paper presented at: American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2006; Seattle, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Stratbucker RA, Kroll MW, McDaniel W, et al. Cardiac current density distribution by electrical pulses from TASER devices. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:6305–6307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Panescu D, Kroll MW, Efimov IR, et al. Finite element modeling of electric field effects of TASER devices on nerve and muscle. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:1277–1279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wetli C. Excited delirium. In: Chan R, ed. Sudden Deaths in Custody. Totawa: Humana Press; 2006:99–112.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  83. DiMaio T, VJM D. Excited Delirium Syndrome Cause of Death and Prevention. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. James E. Brewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark W. Kroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Brewer, J.E., Kroll, M.W. (2009). Field Statistics Overview. In: Ho, J., Kroll, M. (eds) TASER® Conducted Electrical Weapons: Physiology, Pathology, and Law. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85475-5_24

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85475-5_24

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

    • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-85474-8

    • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85475-5

    • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation