Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie

Georgiou AN, Rassweiler J, Herrmann TR, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Do EM, Kallidonis P, de la Teille A, van Velthoven R, Burchardt M (2012) Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML). World J Urol 30:573–580 PubMedCrossRef

Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Arch Surg 147:657–666 PubMedCrossRef

Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899 PubMedCrossRef

Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:1–14 PubMedCrossRef

Hollinsky C, Hollinsky S, Tuchmann F (2013) Comparison of different trocar systems relating to fascial defects. Surg Endosc (zur Publikation eingereicht)

Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF, Reitsma JB, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2012) Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg 99:315–323 PubMedCrossRef

Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2011) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 15:113–121 PubMedCrossRef

Hollinsky C, Sandberg S (2007) Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clin Biomech 22:88–92 CrossRef

Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:1296–1303 PubMedCrossRef

Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702 PubMedCrossRef

Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias AC (2012) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1015 PubMedCrossRef

Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, Chiarandini P, Anania G, Terrosu G, Sistu MA, Pasetto A (1999) Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 65:29–34 CrossRef

Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848 PubMedCrossRef

Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE (2005) Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg 71:298–302 PubMed

Jackson T, Einarsson J (2010) Single-Port Gynecologic Surgery. Rev Obset Gynecol 3:133–139

Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial Surg Endosc 16:458–464

Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Colombo G, Uccella S, Bergamini V, Serati M, Bolis P (2005) Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:480–485 PubMedCrossRef

Hollinsky C, Patri P, Hollinsky S, Tuchmann A (2012) Mini-incisional laparoscopic surgery (MILS) for inguinal hernia repair. Eur Surg 44:1–5 CrossRef

Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Khera S, Gallagher-Dorval KA, Callery MP, Litwin DE, Kelly JJ (2005) Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 140:1178–1183 PubMedCrossRef

Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–685 PubMed

Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627 PubMedCrossRef

Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:1296–1303 PubMedCrossRef

Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27 PubMedCrossRef

Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Espert JJ, Martinez A, Benarroch G, Anglada MT, García-Valdecasas JC (2011) Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:683–686 PubMedCrossRef

Elsey JK, Feliciano DV (2010) Initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecistectomy. J Am Coll Surg 210:620–624 PubMedCrossRef

Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899 PubMedCrossRef

Pryor AD, Tushar JR, DiBernardo LR (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe. Surg Endosc 24:917–923 PubMedCrossRef