01.10.2013 | Chirurgie | Ausgabe 5/2013
Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie
SILS vs. MILS
- Zeitschrift:
- Wiener klinisches Magazin > Ausgabe 5/2013
Tipp
Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Anzeige
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Georgiou AN, Rassweiler J, Herrmann TR, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Do EM, Kallidonis P, de la Teille A, van Velthoven R, Burchardt M (2012) Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML). World J Urol 30:573–580 PubMedCrossRef Georgiou AN, Rassweiler J, Herrmann TR, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Do EM, Kallidonis P, de la Teille A, van Velthoven R, Burchardt M (2012) Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML). World J Urol 30:573–580
PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Arch Surg 147:657–666 PubMedCrossRef Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Arch Surg 147:657–666
PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899 PubMedCrossRef Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899
PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:1–14 PubMedCrossRef Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:1–14
PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollinsky C, Hollinsky S, Tuchmann F (2013) Comparison of different trocar systems relating to fascial defects. Surg Endosc (zur Publikation eingereicht) Hollinsky C, Hollinsky S, Tuchmann F (2013) Comparison of different trocar systems relating to fascial defects. Surg Endosc (zur Publikation eingereicht)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF, Reitsma JB, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2012) Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg 99:315–323 PubMedCrossRef Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF, Reitsma JB, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2012) Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg 99:315–323
PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2011) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 15:113–121 PubMedCrossRef Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T (2011) Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia 15:113–121
PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollinsky C, Sandberg S (2007) Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clin Biomech 22:88–92 CrossRef Hollinsky C, Sandberg S (2007) Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clin Biomech 22:88–92
CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:1296–1303 PubMedCrossRef Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:1296–1303
PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702 PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702
PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias AC (2012) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1015 PubMedCrossRef Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias AC (2012) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1015
PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, Chiarandini P, Anania G, Terrosu G, Sistu MA, Pasetto A (1999) Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 65:29–34 CrossRef Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, Chiarandini P, Anania G, Terrosu G, Sistu MA, Pasetto A (1999) Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 65:29–34
CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848 PubMedCrossRef Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848
PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE (2005) Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg 71:298–302 PubMed Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE (2005) Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg 71:298–302
PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson T, Einarsson J (2010) Single-Port Gynecologic Surgery. Rev Obset Gynecol 3:133–139 Jackson T, Einarsson J (2010) Single-Port Gynecologic Surgery. Rev Obset Gynecol 3:133–139
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial Surg Endosc 16:458–464 Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial Surg Endosc 16:458–464
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Colombo G, Uccella S, Bergamini V, Serati M, Bolis P (2005) Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:480–485 PubMedCrossRef Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Colombo G, Uccella S, Bergamini V, Serati M, Bolis P (2005) Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:480–485
PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollinsky C, Patri P, Hollinsky S, Tuchmann A (2012) Mini-incisional laparoscopic surgery (MILS) for inguinal hernia repair. Eur Surg 44:1–5 CrossRef Hollinsky C, Patri P, Hollinsky S, Tuchmann A (2012) Mini-incisional laparoscopic surgery (MILS) for inguinal hernia repair. Eur Surg 44:1–5
CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Khera S, Gallagher-Dorval KA, Callery MP, Litwin DE, Kelly JJ (2005) Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 140:1178–1183 PubMedCrossRef Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Khera S, Gallagher-Dorval KA, Callery MP, Litwin DE, Kelly JJ (2005) Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 140:1178–1183
PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–685 PubMed Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–685
PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627 PubMedCrossRef Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1624–1627
PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:1296–1303 PubMedCrossRef Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. (2012) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:1296–1303
PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27 PubMedCrossRef Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254:22–27
PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Espert JJ, Martinez A, Benarroch G, Anglada MT, García-Valdecasas JC (2011) Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:683–686 PubMedCrossRef Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Espert JJ, Martinez A, Benarroch G, Anglada MT, García-Valdecasas JC (2011) Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:683–686
PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Elsey JK, Feliciano DV (2010) Initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecistectomy. J Am Coll Surg 210:620–624 PubMedCrossRef Elsey JK, Feliciano DV (2010) Initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecistectomy. J Am Coll Surg 210:620–624
PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899 PubMedCrossRef Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899
PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pryor AD, Tushar JR, DiBernardo LR (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe. Surg Endosc 24:917–923 PubMedCrossRef Pryor AD, Tushar JR, DiBernardo LR (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe. Surg Endosc 24:917–923
PubMedCrossRef
- Titel
-
Laparoskopische Cholezystektomie
SILS vs. MILS - Autor:
-
PD Dr. C. Hollinsky
- Publikationsdatum
- 01.10.2013
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00740-013-0111-x
- Verlag
- Springer Vienna
- Zeitschrift
-
Wiener klinisches Magazin
Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 1869-1757
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7817