Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 17-18/2014

01.09.2014 | original article

Effectiveness and safety of ciclesonide in the treatment of patients with persistent allergic or non-allergic asthma in medical practice (Data from a non-interventional study conducted in Austria)

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Otto Chris Burghuber, MD, Dr. Gerhard Köberl, MD, Dr. Susanna Lenk-Feik, MD, Dr. Monika Schantl, MD, Dr. Peter Sander, MD, Alexandra Hammer, MSc

Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift | Ausgabe 17-18/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

Effectiveness and safety profile of ciclesonide in the treatment of persistent allergic or non-allergic asthma was evaluated in real-life setting in Austria.

Methods

Prospective, single-arm, 3-month observational, non-interventional, open-label cohort study in patients with persistent asthma (with or without allergic component) of any severity grade was conducted. Patients were either treatment naïve or switched to treatment with ciclesonide and had an indication for treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

Results

In all, 307 patients (50.8 % female; mean age, 45.7 years) were prescribed ciclesonide. After 3 months of observation, the percentage of patients with daily symptoms had declined from 33.2 to 3.9 %, night-time symptoms from 21.8 to 5.2 %, physical activity limitations from 73.9 to 24.4 %, and rescue medication usage from 70.0 to 45.9 %. The mean total Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score was 2.32 ± 1.14 at the first and 1.08 ± 0.88 at the final visit. The number of patients with well-controlled asthma (ACQ score < 1) increased considerably from 11.0 % at baseline to 52.2 % at study end. Clinically important mean improvements were observed in the total self-assessed Asthma Quality of Life score and all four domain scores. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) increased by 0.3 L from 2.60 ± 0.87 L to 2.89 ± 0.86 L, and the mean FEV1% predicted increased from 75.1 ± 15.4 % to 83.7 ± 14.9 %. Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was low (4 ADRs in 3 of 307 patients, or 1.0 %).

Conclusion

This study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of ciclesonide under routine conditions in Austria. Improvements in symptom control, lung function, and quality of life were observed. Ciclesonide was well tolerated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baptist AD, Reddy RC. Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: are they all the same? J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:1–12.PubMedCrossRef Baptist AD, Reddy RC. Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: are they all the same? J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:1–12.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman S, Salmon A, Nave R, Drollmann A. High lung deposition of 99mTc-labeled ciclesonide administered via HFA-MDI to patients with asthma. Respir Med. 2006;100(3):375–84.PubMedCrossRef Newman S, Salmon A, Nave R, Drollmann A. High lung deposition of 99mTc-labeled ciclesonide administered via HFA-MDI to patients with asthma. Respir Med. 2006;100(3):375–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman KR, Patel P, D’Urzo AD, et al. Maintenance of asthma control by once-daily inhaled ciclesonide in adults with persistent asthma. Allergy. 2005;60(3):330–7.PubMedCrossRef Chapman KR, Patel P, D’Urzo AD, et al. Maintenance of asthma control by once-daily inhaled ciclesonide in adults with persistent asthma. Allergy. 2005;60(3):330–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Buhl R, Vinkler I, Magyar P, et al. Comparable efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2006;19:404–12.PubMedCrossRef Buhl R, Vinkler I, Magyar P, et al. Comparable efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2006;19:404–12.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Magnussen H, Hofmann J, Staneta P, et al. Similar efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in patients with persistent asthma. J Asthma. 2007;44(7):555–63.PubMedCrossRef Magnussen H, Hofmann J, Staneta P, et al. Similar efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in patients with persistent asthma. J Asthma. 2007;44(7):555–63.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Niphadkar P, Jagannath K, Joshi JM, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of ciclesonide 160 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID in adults with persistent asthma: a phase III, randomized, double-dummy, open-label study. Clin Ther. 2005;27(11):1752–63.PubMedCrossRef Niphadkar P, Jagannath K, Joshi JM, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of ciclesonide 160 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID in adults with persistent asthma: a phase III, randomized, double-dummy, open-label study. Clin Ther. 2005;27(11):1752–63.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled ciclesonide. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47:782–9.PubMedCrossRef Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled ciclesonide. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47:782–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Craig T. The safety profile of ciclesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009;30:315–24.PubMedCrossRef Craig T. The safety profile of ciclesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009;30:315–24.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat International Epidemiological Association (IEA) European Federation. Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP)—IEA Guidelines for proper conduct of epidemiological research. November 2007. http://ieaweb.org/guidelines/. Accessed 5 Sept. 2013. International Epidemiological Association (IEA) European Federation. Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP)—IEA Guidelines for proper conduct of epidemiological research. November 2007. http://​ieaweb.​org/​guidelines/​. Accessed 5 Sept. 2013.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Holgate S, Bisgaard H, Bjermer L, et al. The Brussels Declaration: the need for change in asthma management. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:1433–42.PubMedCrossRef Holgate S, Bisgaard H, Bjermer L, et al. The Brussels Declaration: the need for change in asthma management. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:1433–42.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Juniper EF, Bousquet J, Abetz L, Bateman ED, GOAL committee. Identifying “well-controlled” and “not well-controlled” asthma using the Asthma Control Questionnaire. Respir Med. 2006;100:616–21.PubMedCrossRef Juniper EF, Bousquet J, Abetz L, Bateman ED, GOAL committee. Identifying “well-controlled” and “not well-controlled” asthma using the Asthma Control Questionnaire. Respir Med. 2006;100:616–21.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Juniper EF, Buist AS, Cox FM, et al. Validations of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chest. 1999;115(5):1265–70.PubMedCrossRef Juniper EF, Buist AS, Cox FM, et al. Validations of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chest. 1999;115(5):1265–70.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wantke F. Asthma bronchiale bei Erwachsenen—Diagnostik & Therapie. Wien klin Wochenschr Educ. 2012;7(1):1–20.CrossRef Wantke F. Asthma bronchiale bei Erwachsenen—Diagnostik & Therapie. Wien klin Wochenschr Educ. 2012;7(1):1–20.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bateman ED, Linnhof AE, Homik L, et al. Comparison of twice-daily inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008;21(2):264–75.PubMedCrossRef Bateman ED, Linnhof AE, Homik L, et al. Comparison of twice-daily inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008;21(2):264–75.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulet LP, Bateman ED, Voves R, Müller T, Wolf S, Engelstätter R. A randomized study comparing ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Respir Med. 2007;101(8):1677–86.PubMedCrossRef Boulet LP, Bateman ED, Voves R, Müller T, Wolf S, Engelstätter R. A randomized study comparing ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Respir Med. 2007;101(8):1677–86.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansel TT, Path FRC, Benezet O, et al. A multinational, 12-week, randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide and budesonide in patients with asthma. Clin Ther. 2006;28:906–90.PubMedCrossRef Hansel TT, Path FRC, Benezet O, et al. A multinational, 12-week, randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide and budesonide in patients with asthma. Clin Ther. 2006;28:906–90.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Santanello NC, Zhang J, Seidenberg B, Reiss TF, Barber BL. What are minimal important changes for asthma measures in a clinical trial? Eur Respir J. 1999;14(1):23–7.PubMedCrossRef Santanello NC, Zhang J, Seidenberg B, Reiss TF, Barber BL. What are minimal important changes for asthma measures in a clinical trial? Eur Respir J. 1999;14(1):23–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effectiveness and safety of ciclesonide in the treatment of patients with persistent allergic or non-allergic asthma in medical practice (Data from a non-interventional study conducted in Austria)
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Otto Chris Burghuber, MD
Dr. Gerhard Köberl, MD
Dr. Susanna Lenk-Feik, MD
Dr. Monika Schantl, MD
Dr. Peter Sander, MD
Alexandra Hammer, MSc
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift / Ausgabe 17-18/2014
Print ISSN: 0043-5325
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-014-0576-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 17-18/2014

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 17-18/2014 Zur Ausgabe

MUW resarcher of the month

MUW resarcher of the month