nach oben

European Surgery

Erschienen in:

16.03.2022 | original article

Diagnosis and management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia—a nationwide assessment of practices

verfasst von: Louise Montalva, MD, Elisabeth Carricaburu, MD, Michael Levy, MD, PhD, Arnaud Bonnard, MD,PhD

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

Although gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent long-term morbidity in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) survivors, no consensual guidelines exist regarding this associated comorbidity. The aim of this study was to assess practices regarding GERD diagnosis and treatment in children born with CDH at a national level.

Methods

An online questionnaire was sent to the 29 centers from the National Reference Centre for CDH. Responses were collected between April and May 2020.

Results

The response rate was 100% (n = 29). In 38% of centers, preventive fundoplication during CDH repair was sometimes considered, whereas in 62%, this practice was never performed. The criteria for performing this surgery were: large defect requiring a patch/muscle flap (91%), intrathoracic stomach (36%)/liver (27%). When preventive fundoplication was performed, an associated gastrostomy was systematically inserted in 36% (n = 4) or never in 55% (n = 6) of centers. In centers that did not perform preventive fundoplication (n = 18), this was justified by department habits (44%), poor evidence/absence of guidelines (44%), and thoracoscopic CDH repair (17%). After CDH repair, anti-reflux medication was systematically administered in 59% of centers (3 months to 2 years). Investigations for GERD diagnosis were never performed systematically before discharge, and in 7% of centers during follow-up.

Conclusion

Despite the prevalence of GERD, practices regarding preventive fundoplication and GERD management in children with CDH vary strongly. Prospective multi-institutional studies are needed to establish guidelines for this fragile cohort of patients.

Vorheriger Artikel Microvascular myocutaneous and cutaneous free flap reconstruction in patients with terminal esophagostomy after complicated oncological esophagus resection

Nächster Artikel Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic

McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F137–F44. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306174.CrossRefPubMed

Zani A, Zani-Ruttenstock E, Pierro A. Advances in the surgical approach to congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:364–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.09.002.CrossRefPubMed

Barrière F, Michel F, Loundou AD, et al. One-year outcome for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: results from the French national register. J Pediatr. 2018;193:204–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.074.CrossRefPubMed

Putnam LR, Harting MT, Tsao K, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia defect size and infant morbidity at discharge. Pediatrics. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2043.CrossRefPubMed

Peetsold MG, Heij HA, Kneepkens CMF, et al. The long-term follow-up of patients with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a broad spectrum of morbidity. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2257-y.CrossRefPubMed

Jaillard SM, Pierrat V, Dubois A, et al. Outcome at 2 years of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:250–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04278-9.CrossRefPubMed

Yokota K, Uchida H, Kaneko K, et al. Surgical complications, especially gastroesophageal reflux disease, intestinal adhesion obstruction, and diaphragmatic hernia recurrence, are major sequelae in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014;30:895–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3575-x.CrossRefPubMed

Caruso AM, Di Pace MR, Catalano P, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in patients treated for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: short- and long-term evaluation with multichannel intraluminal impedance. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29:553–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3303-y.CrossRefPubMed

Kieffer J, Sapin E, Berg A, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:1330–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(95)90497-2.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Fasching G, Huber A, Uray E, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and diaphragmatic motility after repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2000;10:360–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-12060.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Rayyan M, Omari T, Debeer A, et al. Characterization of esophageal motility in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia using high-resolution manometry. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;69:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002325.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, et al. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66:516–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001889.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Diamond IR, Mah K, Kim PCW, et al. Predicting the need for fundoplication at the time of congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1066–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.01.046.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Chamond C, Morineau M, Gouizi G, et al. Preventive antireflux surgery in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. World J Surg. 2008;32:2454–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9738-y.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Zani A, Eaton S, Puri P, et al. International survey on the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016;26:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1564713.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Marseglia L, Manti S, D’Angelo G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and congenital gastrointestinal malformations. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8508–15. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8508.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Dariel A, Rozé J‑C, Piloquet H, Podevin G. Impact of prophylactic fundoplication on survival without growth disorder in left congenital diaphragmatic hernia requiring a patch repair. 2011.

18.

Maier S, Zahn K, Wessel LM, et al. Preventive antireflux surgery in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a single-blinded prospective study. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:1510–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.085.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Puligandla PS, Skarsgard ED. The Canadian pediatric surgery network congenital diaphragmatic hernia evidence review project: developing national guidelines for care. Paediatr Child Health. 2016;21:183–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/21.4.183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Snoek KG, Reiss IKMM, Greenough A, et al. Standardized postnatal management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: the CDH EURO consortium consensus—2015 update. Neonatology. 2016;110:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444210.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Puligandla PS, Grabowski J, Austin M, et al. Management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review from the APSA outcomes and evidence based practice committee. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:1958–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.09.010.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Lopez-Fernandez S, Hernandez F, Hernandez-Martin S, et al. Failed nissen fundoplication in children: causes and management. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014;24:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351664.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Diagnosis and management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia—a nationwide assessment of practices
verfasst von: Louise Montalva, MD
Elisabeth Carricaburu, MD
Michael Levy, MD, PhD
Arnaud Bonnard, MD,PhD
Publikationsdatum: 16.03.2022
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: European Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00748-w

Springer Medizin Österreich

Summary

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Giant pedunculated liposarcoma of the esophagus

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus noncomplete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic

Surgery and the summer of smile (2022)!

Robotic versus laparoscopic splenectomy: a systematic review of perioperative outcomes

Microvascular myocutaneous and cutaneous free flap reconstruction in patients with terminal esophagostomy after complicated oncological esophagus resection