nach oben

vorheriger Artikel Breast cancer—advanced stage: “cure—still a lon...

nächster Artikel Immunotherapy for nonsmall-cell lung cancer

Tipp

Clinical practice guidelines in oncology—achievements and challenges

Zeitschrift:: memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology > Ausgabe 2/2012

Autor:: MD Günther Gastl

Wichtige Hinweise

The health care community relies heavily on the continuous translation of scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines.

Without Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Jetzt einloggen Kostenlos registrieren

Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, Van Der Wees P. Guidelines international network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Int Med. 2012;156:525–31. PubMed

Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011.

EBM Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284:2100–7. CrossRef

Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence-based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. Br Med J. 1995;310:1122–6. CrossRef

Smith TJ, Hilnner BE. Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19: 2886–97. PubMed

Ray-Coquard I, Philip T, de Laroche G, et al. A controlled “before-after” study: impact of a clinical guidelines programme and regional cancer network organization on medical practice. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:313–21. CrossRefPubMed

Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, et al. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Int Med. 2003;139:493–8.

Vigna-Taglianti F, Vineis P, Liberati A, Faggiano F. Quality of systematic reviews used in guidelines for oncology practice. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:691–701. CrossRefPubMed

Petheroudakis G, Stahel R, Hansen H, Pavlidis N. Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate? Ann Oncol. 2008;19:2067–78.

10.

Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Development of AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010;182:E472–8. CrossRefPubMed

11.

World Health Organization. Global programme on evidence for health policy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

12.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009.

13.

American Society of Clinical Oncology. ASCO Guideline procedures manual. Expert panel version 4.0. Alexandria: ASCO; 2011.

14.

Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M, et al. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the appraisal of guidelines and research and evaluation instrument. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2000–7. CrossRefPubMed

15.

Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P. Clinical guidelines committee of the American college of physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American college of physicians: summary of methods. Ann Int Med. 2010;153:194–9. PubMed

16.

Graham ID, Evans WK, Logan D, et al. Canadian oncologists and clinical practice guidelines: a national survey of attitudes and reported use. Provincial Lung Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario. Oncology. 2000;59:283–90. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bennet CL; Somerfield MR, Pfister DG, et al. Perspectives on the value of American society of clinical oncology clinical guidelines as reported by oncologists and health maintenance organizations. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:937–41. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Pavlidis N, Hansen H, Stahel R. ESMO clinical recommendations: a practical guide for medical oncologists. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1759–63. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Durand-Zaleski I, Colin C, Blum-Boisgard C. An attempt to save money by using mandatory practice guidelines in France. Br Med J. 1997;315:943–5. CrossRef

20.

Giacomini M, et al. Using practice guidelines to allocate medical technologies. An ethics framework. Int J Techn Assess Health Care. 2000;16:987–1002. CrossRef

21.

Browman GP. Improving clinical practice guidelines for the 21st century. Attitudinal barriers and not technology are the main challenges. Int J Techn Assess Health Care. 2000;16:959–68. CrossRef

22.

Smith R. Making progress with competing interests. Br Med J. 2002;325:1375–6. CrossRef

23.

ter Meulen R, Biller-Andorno N, Lenk C, Lie RK, editors. Evidence-based practice in medicine and health care. A discussion of ethical issues. Berlin: Springer, 2005 (ISBN 3-540-22239-1). CrossRef

Titel: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology—achievements and challenges
Autor:: MD Günther Gastl
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-012-0015-2
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Zeitschrift: memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology An International Journal for Oncology and Haematology Professionals
Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1865-5041
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-5076

Springer Medizin Österreich

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Without Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

The role of biomarkers in the choice of therapy in breast cancer

Immunotherapy for nonsmall-cell lung cancer

Immunotherapeutic approaches targeting prostate cancer and its microenvironment

Is distinct EGFR mutation status proof of second simultaneous primary non-small cell lung cancer?

Sjögren syndrome complicated with hairy-cell leukemia: a case-based review

Advances in haematology and oncology 2011: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)