Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

01.10.2016 | Short Communication | Ausgabe 5/2016

European Surgery 5/2016

Cleft lift versus standard excision with primary midline closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. A snapshot of worldwide current practice

Surgical treatment of pilonidal disease

Zeitschrift:
European Surgery > Ausgabe 5/2016
Autoren:
F. Guerra, G. Giuliani, S. Amore Bonapasta, D. Coletta, F. La Torre
Wichtige Hinweise
No grant has been received for the drawing up of the present paper. The authors declare no financial relationships with any pharmaceutical or device company.

Summary

Background

Several surgeries are available to treat pilonidal disease.

Methods

We analysed the relative effects of conventional excision with primary midline closure compared with the cleft lift procedure on the clinical outcomes of recent published reports.

Results

A total of 14 studies containing 2089 patients were included in the analysis. At pooled analysis of available data, the cleft lift procedure showed significantly lower rate of recurrence, shorter time to complete wound healing and faster return to daily activities.

Conclusions

The quality of available inherent evidence is not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Although the clinical heterogeneity among studies represents a valid concern, the quantitative synthesis of the recent literature seems to support the use of the cleft lift over conventional excision with primary midline closure.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Abo für kostenpflichtige Inhalte

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

European Surgery 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe