Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 3-4/2022

28.10.2021 | original article

Benchmarking diagnostic laboratory performance: Survey results for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

verfasst von: Wolfgang Huf, Mike Mohns, Tetiana Garmatiuk, Rebecca Lister, Christoph Buchta, Brigitte Ettl, Ursula Köller

Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift | Ausgabe 3-4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background and aims

The need for patient safety through consistent diagnostic performance has increasingly been brought into focus during the last two decades. Around the globe operational efficiency of diagnostic laboratories plays a key role in satisfying this need, which has impressively been shown during the recent months of the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic. On a global level, however, there has been a lack to collate and benchmark data for diagnostic laboratories. The goals of this study were to design and pilot a questionnaire addressing key aspects of diagnostic laboratory management.

Methods

The questionnaire was designed using an iterative process and taking into consideration information that could be extracted from the literature, author experience and feedback from informal focus groups of laboratory professionals. The resulting tool consisted of 50 items, either relating to general information or more specifically addressing the topics of “operational performance”, “integrated clinical care performance”, and “financial sustainability”. A limited number of laboratories were surveyed to be able to further improve the newly developed tool and motivate the global laboratory community to participate in further benchmarking activity.

Results and conclusion

Altogether, 65 laboratories participated in the survey, 42 were hospital laboratories and 23 were commercial laboratories. Potential for further improvement and standardization became apparent across the board, e.g. use of IT for order management, auto-validation, or turn-around time (TAT) monitoring. Notably, a gap was identified regarding services provided to physicians, in particular “reflexive test suggestions”, “proactive consultation on complex cases”, and “diagnostic pathways guidance”, which were only provided by about two thirds of laboratories. Concordantly, within-laboratory TAT (Lab TAT) was monitored by about 80% of respondents, while sample-to-result TAT, which is arguably the TAT most relevant to clinicians, was only monitored by 32% of respondents. Altogether, the need for stronger integration of the laboratory into the clinical care process became apparent and should be a main trajectory of future laboratory management.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; 2000. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; 2000.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; 2015.CrossRef Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; 2015.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1881–7.CrossRef Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1881–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, et al. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e149856.CrossRef Rohr UP, Binder C, Dieterle T, Giusti F, Messina CG, Toerien E, et al. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e149856.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Badrick T, Stavelin A. Harmonising EQA schemes the next frontier: challenging the status quo. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(11):1795–7.CrossRef Badrick T, Stavelin A. Harmonising EQA schemes the next frontier: challenging the status quo. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(11):1795–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadamuro J, Gaksch M, Mrazek C, Haschke-Becher E, Plebani M. How do we use the data from pre-analytical quality indicators and how should we? J Lab Precis Med. 2018;3:40.CrossRef Cadamuro J, Gaksch M, Mrazek C, Haschke-Becher E, Plebani M. How do we use the data from pre-analytical quality indicators and how should we? J Lab Precis Med. 2018;3:40.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barth JH. Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a survey of current practice in the UK. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48:238–40.CrossRef Barth JH. Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a survey of current practice in the UK. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48:238–40.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schifman RB, Howanitz PJ, Zarbo RJ. Q‑probes: a College of American Pathologists benchmarking program for quality management in pathology and laboratory medicine. In: Weinstein RS, editor. Advances in pathology and laboratory medicine. Chicago: Mosby-Yearbook; 1996. pp. 83–120. Schifman RB, Howanitz PJ, Zarbo RJ. Q‑probes: a College of American Pathologists benchmarking program for quality management in pathology and laboratory medicine. In: Weinstein RS, editor. Advances in pathology and laboratory medicine. Chicago: Mosby-Yearbook; 1996. pp. 83–120.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:79–85.CrossRef Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:79–85.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sciacovelli L, Panteghini M, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, Cadamuro J, Galoro CAO, et al. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC working group “Laboratory error and patient safety” and EFLM task and finish group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:1478–88.PubMed Sciacovelli L, Panteghini M, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, Cadamuro J, Galoro CAO, et al. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC working group “Laboratory error and patient safety” and EFLM task and finish group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:1478–88.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meier FA, Souers RJ, Howanitz PJ, Tworek JA, Perrotta PL, Nakhleh RE, et al. Seven Q‑Tracks monitors of laboratory quality drive general performance improvement: experience from the College of American Pathologists Q‑Tracks program 1999–2011. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:762–75.CrossRef Meier FA, Souers RJ, Howanitz PJ, Tworek JA, Perrotta PL, Nakhleh RE, et al. Seven Q‑Tracks monitors of laboratory quality drive general performance improvement: experience from the College of American Pathologists Q‑Tracks program 1999–2011. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:762–75.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shcolnik W, Berlitz F, Galoro CAO, Biasoli V, Lopes R, Jeronimo D, et al. Brazilian laboratory indicators benchmarking program: three-year experience on pre-analytical quality indicators. Diagnosis. 2021;8:257–68.CrossRef Shcolnik W, Berlitz F, Galoro CAO, Biasoli V, Lopes R, Jeronimo D, et al. Brazilian laboratory indicators benchmarking program: three-year experience on pre-analytical quality indicators. Diagnosis. 2021;8:257–68.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Duan M, Kang F, Zhao H, Wang W, Du Y, He F, et al. Analysis and evaluation of the external quality assessment results of quality indicators in laboratory medicine all over China from 2015 to 2018. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:812–21.CrossRef Duan M, Kang F, Zhao H, Wang W, Du Y, He F, et al. Analysis and evaluation of the external quality assessment results of quality indicators in laboratory medicine all over China from 2015 to 2018. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:812–21.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Plebani M. The quality indicator paradox. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:1119–22.PubMed Plebani M. The quality indicator paradox. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:1119–22.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Price CP. Benchmarking in laboratory medicine: are we measuring the right outcomes? Benchmarking. 2005;12:449–66.CrossRef Price CP. Benchmarking in laboratory medicine: are we measuring the right outcomes? Benchmarking. 2005;12:449–66.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Badrick TC, Gutscher A, Sakamoto N, Chin D. Diagnostic laboratories in Asia Pacific region: investigation on quality characteristics and time of reporting. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:625–31.CrossRef Badrick TC, Gutscher A, Sakamoto N, Chin D. Diagnostic laboratories in Asia Pacific region: investigation on quality characteristics and time of reporting. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:625–31.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat de Kieviet W, Blaton V, Kovacs GL, Palicka V, Pulkki K. The management of clinical laboratories in Europe: a FESCC survey. Forum of the European Societies of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40:312–9.CrossRef de Kieviet W, Blaton V, Kovacs GL, Palicka V, Pulkki K. The management of clinical laboratories in Europe: a FESCC survey. Forum of the European Societies of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40:312–9.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Frade JG, Costa E, Araújo L, Rodrigues F. With eyes wide shut—What aren’t we seeing? Managing the clincal expectation time at the preanalytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:eA80. Frade JG, Costa E, Araújo L, Rodrigues F. With eyes wide shut—What aren’t we seeing? Managing the clincal expectation time at the preanalytical phase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:eA80.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA. 1981;245:1762–3.CrossRef Lundberg GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA. 1981;245:1762–3.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic A‑M. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med. 2010;20:126–30.CrossRef Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic A‑M. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med. 2010;20:126–30.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Padoan A, Plebani M. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56:1644–54.CrossRef Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Padoan A, Plebani M. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56:1644–54.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Molinaro R, McCudden CR, Bonhomme M, Saenger A. Clinical core laboratory testing. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Molinaro R, McCudden CR, Bonhomme M, Saenger A. Clinical core laboratory testing. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:750–9.PubMed Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:750–9.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kenwright KM. Career satisfaction in the profession of medical laboratory science. J Allied Health. 2018;47:222–7.PubMed Kenwright KM. Career satisfaction in the profession of medical laboratory science. J Allied Health. 2018;47:222–7.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewandrowski K. Integrating decision support into a laboratory utilization management program. Clin Lab Med. 2019;39:245–57.CrossRef Lewandrowski K. Integrating decision support into a laboratory utilization management program. Clin Lab Med. 2019;39:245–57.CrossRef
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans J, Rzhetsky A. Philosophy of science. Machine science. Science. 2010;329:399–400.CrossRef Evans J, Rzhetsky A. Philosophy of science. Machine science. Science. 2010;329:399–400.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Burton RJ, Albur M, Eberl M, Cuff SM. Using artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic workload without compromising detection of urinary tract infections. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19:171.CrossRef Burton RJ, Albur M, Eberl M, Cuff SM. Using artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic workload without compromising detection of urinary tract infections. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19:171.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mlinaric A, Milos M, Coen Herak D, Fucek M, Rimac V, Zadro R, et al. Autovalidation and automation of the postanalytical phase of routine hematology and coagulation analyses in a university hospital laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56:454–62.CrossRef Mlinaric A, Milos M, Coen Herak D, Fucek M, Rimac V, Zadro R, et al. Autovalidation and automation of the postanalytical phase of routine hematology and coagulation analyses in a university hospital laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56:454–62.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruson D, Bernardini S, Dabla PK, Gouget B, Stankovic S. Collaborative AI and laboratory medicine integration in precision cardiovascular medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;509:67–71.CrossRef Gruson D, Bernardini S, Dabla PK, Gouget B, Stankovic S. Collaborative AI and laboratory medicine integration in precision cardiovascular medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;509:67–71.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Döring N, Bortz J. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin: Springer; 2016.CrossRef Döring N, Bortz J. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin: Springer; 2016.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Benchmarking diagnostic laboratory performance: Survey results for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland
verfasst von
Wolfgang Huf
Mike Mohns
Tetiana Garmatiuk
Rebecca Lister
Christoph Buchta
Brigitte Ettl
Ursula Köller
Publikationsdatum
28.10.2021
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift / Ausgabe 3-4/2022
Print ISSN: 0043-5325
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01962-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2022

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 3-4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

mitteilungen der gesellschaft der ärzte in wien

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift