Download PDF
CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46(03): 241-247
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2018.00843
Original Article

Comparison of postoperative pain according to the harvesting method used in hair restorative surgery

Yang Seok Kim 
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
,
Young Cheon Na 
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
,
Jae Hyun Park 
Dana Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Background Postoperative pain is one of the most common concerns of patients undergoing hair transplantation surgery. Because most patients are satisfied with the cosmetic improvement after transplantation, amelioration of postoperative pain would help to increase patient accessibility to hair restorative surgery and greatly impact patient satisfaction with the final cosmetic results. This study was performed to investigate postoperative pain after hair transplantation.

Methods In total, 241 patients (202 who underwent follicular unit transplantation [FUT] and 39 who underwent follicular unit extraction [FUE]) were eligible for the study. Postoperative pain was evaluated on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale. The patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed for information on the harvesting method, number of transplanted grafts, size of donor design, and laxity, elasticity, and glidability of the scalp in relation to postoperative pain.

Results Postoperative pain after hair transplantation, assessed with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, seemed to provide very subjective results. None of the variables were correlated with postoperative pain in the FUT group. Such pain, however, tended to disappear by postoperative day 3. Patients in the FUE group experienced significantly less severe pain than those in the FUT group.

Conclusions Postoperative pain was significantly less severe in patients whose donor hair was harvested by the FUE than FUT method. Postoperative pain had almost disappeared by postoperative day 3 in the FUT group, whereas only minimal pain was present even on postoperative day 1 in the FUE group.

Keywords

Pain - Pain measurement - Pain management - Hair follicle


Publication History

Received: 26 June 2018

Accepted: 26 January 2019

Article published online:
28 March 2022

© 2019. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS. et al. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 534-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nusbaum BP. Techniques to reduce pain associated with hair transplantation: optimizing anesthesia and analgesia. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5: 9-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nussbaum BP. Reducing pain during hair transplant lidocaine infiltration. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bernstein RM, Rassman WR. Limiting epinephrine in large hair transplant sessions. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2000; 10: 39-41
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Park JH. Association between scalp laxity, elasticity, and glidability and donor strip scar width in hair transplantation and a new elasticity measuring method. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43: 574-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Garra G, Singer AJ, Domingo A. et al. The Wong-Baker pain FACES scale measures pain, not fear. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29: 17-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of “multimodal” or “balanced analgesia” in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 1048-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fosko SW, Gibney MD, Harrison B. Repetitive pinching of the skin during lidocaine infiltration reduces patient discomfort. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 74-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Parsley WM. Vibrators. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2000; 10: 20
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Barusco MN, Leavitt HL, Kirk R. The use of a computerized anesthesia injection system to minimize pain during hair transplant surgery. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2001; 4: 107-9
    Google Scholar
  • 12 True RH, Elliott RM. Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia versus the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 463-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar