Mortality after Hip Fracture in Diabetic Patients

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim: Type 2 diabetic patients have an increased incidence of hip fracture. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the mortality rate after hip fracture and determine the predictors of mortality in diabetic patients.

Methods: 356 patients who sustained a hip fracture between January 1997 and June 2008 were retrospectively reviewed for the study. Of the eligible 230 patients, 69 had type 2 diabetes. Each of these patients’ medical and nursing notes were reviewed to ascertain additional information, including patient demographic factors, prior co-morbidities, fracture type, length of post-fracture stay and post-operative complications, the presence and duration of diabetes, glucose levels, HbA1c levels, albumin and hemoglobin levels.

Results: 148 women (64.3%) and 82 men (35.7%) were included in the study. The mean age of the study group was 76.1±10.4 years. The mean age for diabetics was 76.1±12.0 years and was 75.1±9.4 years for non-diabetics (p=0.343). Diabetic patients with hip fracture had a higher risk of mortality than the non-diabetic patients. One year survival probabilities of diabetic and non-diabetic patients were respectively 68.0% and 87.3% (p=0.033). In diabetic patients with a hip fracture, predictors of mortality were advanced age, the presence of postoperative complications and elevated HbA1c levels.

Conclusions: Diabetic patients have an increased risk of mortality after hip fracture. The medical care in the post-operative period, including glycemic control and postoperative complications, should be optimized in diabetic patients suffering from hip fracture in order to decrease mortality in these patients.

References

• 1 Christensen JO, Swendsen OL. Bone mineral in pre- and postmenopausal women with insulin dependent and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.  Osteoporosis Int. 1999;  10 307-311
  Google Scholar
• 2 Cornwall R, Gilbert MS, Koval KJ. et al . Functional outcomes and mortality vary among different types of hip fractures: a function of patient characteristics.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;  425 64-71
  Google Scholar
• 3 Epstein S, Leroith D. Diabetes and fragility fractures – a burgeoning epidemic?.  Bone. 2008 Jul;  43 (1): 3-6
  Google Scholar
• 4 Forsen L, Sogaard AJ, Meyer HE. et al . Survival after hip fracture: short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender.  Osteoporos Int. 1999;  10 73-78
  Google Scholar
• 5 Fox KM, Magaziner J, Hebel JR. et al . Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment and sequelae.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;  54 M635-M640
  Google Scholar
• 6 Goodson WH, Hung TK. Studies of wound healing in experimental diabetes mellitus.  J Surg Res. 1997;  221-227
  Google Scholar
• 7 Hadjidakis DI, Androulakis II, Mylonakis AM. et al . Diabetes in Postmenopause: Different Influence on Bone Mass According to Age and Disease Duration.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009;  117 199-204
  Google Scholar
• 8 Haentejens P, Autier P, Barette M. et al on behalf of the hip fracture study group Survival and functional outcome according to hip fracture type: A one year prospective cohort study in elderly women with an intertorachanteric or femoral neck fracture.  Bone. 2007;  41 958-964
  Google Scholar
• 9 Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures.  Osteoporosis Int. 2004;  15 38-42
  Google Scholar
• 10 Karagiannis A, Papakitsou E, Dretakis K. et al . Mortality rates of patients with a hip fracture in a southwestern district of Greece: ten-year follow-up with reference to the type fracture.  Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;  78 72-77
  Google Scholar
• 11 Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures.  BMJ. 1993;  307 1248-1250
  Google Scholar
• 12 Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Rokito AS. et al . Patients with femoral neck and intertochanteric fractures. Are they the same?.  Clin Orthop. 1996;  330 166-172
  Google Scholar
• 13 Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE. et al . Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;  50 1644-1650
  Google Scholar
• 14 Lieberman D, Fried V, Castel H. et al . Factors related to successful rehabilitation after hip fracture: a case control study.  Disabil Rehabil. 1996;  18 224-230
  Google Scholar
• 15 Lipscombe LL, Jamal SA, Booth GL. et al . The risk of hip fractures in older individuals with diabetes: a population-based study.  Diabetes Care. 2007;  30 835-884
  Google Scholar
• 16 Matthaei S, Bierwirth R, Fritsche A. et al . Medical Antihyperglycaemic Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Update of the evidence-based guideline of the German Diabetes Association.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009;  117 522-557
  Google Scholar
• 17 Mautalen CA, Vega EM. Different characteristics of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures.  Osteoporos Int Suppl. 1993;  1 102-105
  Google Scholar
• 18 McMurry J. Wound healing of diabetes mellitus: better glucose control for better wound healing in diabetes.  Surg Clin North Am. 1984;  64 769-778
  Google Scholar
• 19 Mizrahi EH, Fleissig Y, Arad M. et al . Functional outcome of elderly hip fracture patients: Does diabetes matter?.  Arch Gerontol and Geriartrics. 2006;  43 165-173
  Google Scholar
• 20 Muraki S, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H. et al . Factors associated with mortality following hip fracture in Japan.  J Bone Miner Metab. 2006;  24 100-104
  Google Scholar
• 21 Nakamura N, Kyou T, Takaoka K. et al . Bone mineral density in the proximal femur and hip fracture type in the elderly.  J Bone Miner Res. 1992;  7 755-759
  Google Scholar
• 22 Nicodemus KK, Folsom AR. Iowa Women's Health Study. Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and incident hip fractures in postmenopausal women.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  7 1192-1197
  Google Scholar
• 23 Paksima N, Koval KJ, Aharanoff G. et al . Predictors of Mortality after Hip Fracture. A 10 year prospective study.  Bulletin of YU Hospital for Joint Diseases. 2008;  66 (2): 111-117
  Google Scholar
• 24 Partanen J, Syrjala H, Vahanikkila H. et al . Impact of deep infection after hip fracture on function and mortality.  Journal of hospital infection. 2006;  62 44-49
  Google Scholar
• 25 Pietschmann P, Patsch JM, Schernthaner G. Diabetes and bone.  Horm Metab Res. 2010 Oct;  42 (11): 763-768
  Google Scholar
• 26 Philip BK, Childress PJ, Robling AG. et al . RAGE supports parathyroid hormone-induced gains in femoral trabecular bone.  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Mar;  298 (3): E714-E725
  Google Scholar
• 27 Piirtola M, Vahlberg T, Löppönen M. et al . Fractures as predictors of excess mortality in the aged – A population-based study with a 12-year follow-up.  Eur J Epidemoiol. 2008;  23 747-755
  Google Scholar
• 28 Schurman L, McCarthy AD, Sedlinsky C. et al . Metformin Reverts Deleterious Effects of Advanced Glycation End-Products (AGEs) on Osteoblastic Cells.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2008;  116 333-340
  Google Scholar
• 29 Tang SY, Zeenath U, Vashishth D. Effects of non-enzymatic glycation on cancellous bone fragility.  Bone. 2007 Apr;  40 (4): 1144-1151
  Google Scholar
• 30 Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Increased mortality in patients with a hip fracture – effect of pre-morbid conditions and post-fracture complications.  Osteoporosis Int. 2007a;  18 1583-1593
  Google Scholar
• 31 Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Has mortality after a hip fracture increased?.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007b;  55 (11): 1720-1726
  Google Scholar
• 32 Vestergaard P. Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes – a meta-analysis.  Osteoporosis Int. 2007;  18 427-444
  Google Scholar
• 33 Zhou Z, Immel D, Xi CX. et al . Regulation of osteoclast function and bone mass by RAGE.  J Exp Med. 2006 Apr 17;  203 (4): 1067-1080
  Google Scholar

Correspondence

N. E. GulcelikMD 

Hacettepe Medical School

Department of Endocrinology

and Metabolism

Sıhhıye/ANKARA – TURKEY

Fax: + 90/312/311 67 68

Email: neseersoz@hotmail.com