Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(05): 334-347
DOI: 10.1055/a-2181-7559
Original Article

Lymphovenous Coupler-Assisted Bypass for Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction

Daisy L. Spoer 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Lauren E. Berger 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
4   Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
,
Parhom N. Towfighi
5   Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Mercy Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
Romina Deldar
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Nisha Gupta
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Samuel S. Huffman 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Banafsheh Sharif-Askary
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Kenneth L. Fan
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Rajiv P. Parikh
4   Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
,
Laura K. Tom 
4   Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Breast cancer-related lymphedema is the most common cause of lymphedema in the United States and occurs in up to 50% of individuals receiving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Lymphovenous bypass (LVB) at the time of ALND may prevent lymphedema, but long-term results and anastomotic patency are unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction via coupler-assisted bypass (CAB).

Methods This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prophylactic LVB following ALND at two tertiary care centers between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into cohorts based on whether they received the “standard” end-to-end (E-E) suturing or CAB technique. The primary outcome of interest was development of lymphedema. Quantitative and qualitative assessments for lymphedema were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results Overall, 63 LVBs were performed, of which 24 lymphatics underwent immediate reconstruction via “CAB” and 39 lymphatics via “standard” end-to-end suture. Patient characteristics, including body mass index, and treatment characteristics, including radiation therapy, did not significantly differ between groups. CAB was associated with a greater mean number of lymphatics bypassed per vein (standard 1.7 vs. CAB 2.6, p = 0.0001) and bypass to larger veins (standard 1.2 vs. CAB 2.2 mm, p < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 9.1% (1/11) of individuals receiving CAB developed lymphedema. These rates were similar to those seen following standard bypass at 4.8% (1/21), although within a significantly shorter follow-up duration (standard 7.8 vs. CAB 14.7 months, p = 0.0170).

Conclusion The CAB technique is a viable, effective technical alternative to the standard LVB technique. This comparative study of techniques in prophylactic LVB suggests that CABs maintain long-term patency, possibly due to the ease of anastomosing several lymphatics to single large caliber veins while reducing the technical demands of the procedure.

Keywords

breast - breast cancer-related lymphedema - prophylactic - anastomosis - outcomes


Publication History

Received: 27 January 2023

Accepted: 18 September 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 September 2023

Article published online:
15 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Greene AK. Epidemiology and morbidity of lymphedema. In: Greene AK, Slavin SA, Brorson H. eds. Lymphedema: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015: 33-44
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nguyen TT, Hoskin TL, Habermann EB, Cheville AL, Boughey JC. Breast cancer-related lymphedema risk is related to multidisciplinary treatment and not surgery alone: results from a large cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24 (10) 2972-2980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Li CY, Kataru RP, Mehrara BJ. Histopathologic features of lymphedema: a molecular review. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21 (07) 2546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schaverien MV, Coroneos CJ. Surgical treatment of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 738-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mehrara BJ, Coriddi M, Dayan J. et al 44 - Lymphedema: Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Treatment. . In: Farhadieh RD, Bulstrode NW, Mehrara BJ. et al. (eds) Plastic Surgery - Principles and Practice. Elsevier; 2022: 666-683
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Le NK, Weinstein B, Serraneau K, Tavares T, Laronga C, Panetta N. The learning curve: trends in the first 100 immediate lymphatic reconstructions performed at a single institution. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86 (6S, Suppl 5): S495-S497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Johnson AR, Fleishman A, Granoff MD. et al. Evaluating the impact of immediate lymphatic reconstruction for the surgical prevention of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (03) 373e-381e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hill WKF, Deban M, Platt A, Rojas-Garcia P, Jost E, Temple-Oberle C. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction during axillary node dissection for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (05) e4291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Coriddi M, Mehrara B, Skoracki R, Singhal D, Dayan JH. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction: technical points and literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (02) e3431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chiang SN, Skolnick GB, Westman AM, Sacks JM, Christensen JM. National outcomes of prophylactic lymphovenous bypass during axillary lymph node dissection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (08) 613-620
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F. et al. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: over 4 years follow-up. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (06) 421-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lipman K, Luan A, Stone K, Wapnir I, Karin M, Nguyen D. Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for lymphedema prevention after axillary lymph node dissection-a single institution experience and feasibility of technique. J Clin Med 2021; 11 (01) 92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F. et al. Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach: a new technique for primary prevention of arm lymphedema after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (03) 703-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Casabona F, Bogliolo S, Valenzano Menada M, Sala P, Villa G, Ferrero S. Feasibility of axillary reverse mapping during sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (09) 2459-2463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Agrawal J, Mehta S, Goel A, Pande PK, Kumar K. Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema-a preliminary report. Indian J Surg Oncol 2018; 9 (03) 369-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schwarz GS, Grobmyer SR, Djohan RS. et al. Axillary reverse mapping and lymphaticovenous bypass: lymphedema prevention through enhanced lymphatic visualization and restoration of flow. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120 (02) 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Feldman S, Bansil H, Ascherman J. et al. Single institution experience with Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (10) 3296-3301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hahamoff M, Gupta N, Munoz D. et al. A lymphedema surveillance program for breast cancer patients reveals the promise of surgical prevention. J Surg Res 2019; 244: 604-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Johnson AR, Kimball S, Epstein S. et al. Lymphedema incidence after axillary lymph node dissection: quantifying the impact of radiation and the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82 (4S, Suppl 3): S234-S241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Boccardo FM, Casabona F, Friedman D. et al. Surgical prevention of arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (09) 2500-2505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Boccardo F, Valenzano M, Costantini S. et al. LYMPHA technique to prevent secondary lower limb lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (11) 3558-3563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Squitieri L, Rasmussen PW, Patel KM. An economic analysis of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis among breast cancer patients receiving mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121 (08) 1175-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cakmakoglu C, Kwiecien GJ, Schwarz GS, Gastman B. Lymphaticovenous bypass for immediate lymphatic reconstruction in locoregional advanced melanoma patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 247-252
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Levy AS, Murphy AI, Ishtihar S. et al. Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema: a 4-year follow-up matched cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (02) 413-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sisk GC, Shuck JW, Lopez M, Chang EI. Lymphovenous anastomosis using the venous coupler. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 73 (05) 983-1007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jabbour S, Chang EI. Recent advancements in supermicrosurgical treatment of lymphedema. Plastic and Aesthetic Research 2021; 8: 43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sharma P, Sharma H, St Cyr M, Griffiths M. Never fear the venous-lymphatic coupler is here!. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (02) 290-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40 (05) 373-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fu MR, Cleland CM, Guth AA. et al. L-dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. Lymphology 2013; 46 (02) 85-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Che Bakri NA, Kwasnicki RM, Khan N. et al. Impact of axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy on upper limb morbidity in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277 (04) 572-580
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Helyer LK, Varnic M, Le LW, Leong W, McCready D. Obesity is a risk factor for developing postoperative lymphedema in breast cancer patients. Breast J 2010; 16 (01) 48-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Erickson VS, Pearson ML, Ganz PA, Adams J, Kahn KL. Arm edema in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93 (02) 96-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14 (06) 500-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Aoishi Y, Oura S, Nishiguchi H. et al. Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema: correlation with docetaxel administration. Breast Cancer 2020; 27 (05) 929-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Levy AS, Murphy AI, Ishtihar S, Peysakhovich A, Taback B, Grant RT, Ascherman JA, Feldman S, Rohde CH. Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach for the Primary Prevention of Lymphedema: A 4-Year Follow-Up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; Feb 1; 151 (02) 413-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ishiura R, Yamamoto T, Saito T, Mito D, Iida T. Comparison of lymphovenous shunt methods in a rat model: supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis versus microsurgical lymphaticovenous implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (06) 1407-1413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Onoda S, Satake T, Kinoshita M. Relationship between lymphaticovenular anastomosis outcomes and the number and types of anastomoses. J Surg Res 2022; 269: 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mulroney SE, Myers AK, Netter FH. Netter's Essential Physiology. Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Masoodi Z, Steinbacher J, Tinhofer IE. et al. “Double Barrel” lymphaticovenous anastomosis: a useful addition to a supermicrosurgeon's repertoire. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (04) e4267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Campisi CC, Ryan M, Boccardo F, Campisi C. A single-site technique of multiple lymphatic-venous anastomoses for the treatment of peripheral lymphedema: long-term clinical outcome. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (01) 42-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Chen WF, Yamamoto T, Fisher M, Liao J, Carr J. The “Octopus” lymphaticovenular anastomosis: evolving beyond the standard supermicrosurgical technique. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (06) 450-457
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar