Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 3-4/2015

01.02.2015 | original article

Novel agents have a significant impact on survival of patients with multiple myeloma

verfasst von: Wolfgang Lamm, Sandra Eder, Marija Bojic, Christoph C. Zielinski, Johannes Drach, MD

Erschienen in: Wiener klinische Wochenschrift | Ausgabe 3-4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

In addition to conventional chemotherapeutic regimens and autologous transplantation, novel agents are now part of the treatment armamentarium against multiple myeloma (MM). To evaluate the presumed benefit of novel agents, we performed an analysis of patients with MM at our institution before and after the availability of novel agents.

Design and methods

In all, 200 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed MM (male = 119; female = 81; median age: 61.5 years) treated at our institution between June 1993 and December 2008 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient cohorts were defined according to date of diagnosis (before and after 01-Jan-2000, respectively), treatment received (chemotherapy only vs. therapy including novel agents), risk profile (International Staging System (ISS)-stage), and cytogenetic features. Primary focus of the analysis was overall survival (OS).

Results

Median OS for MM patients who received conventional chemotherapy was 45.2 months and for patients who received novel agents 74.6 months (P < 0.01). OS for those patients who relapsed after autotransplantation before 2000 was 35.2 months, but 72.7 months (P < 0.01) for those patients with a later relapse. Prolongation of survival for patients receiving novel agents was most evident for patients with ISS stage III (median OS 68.4 vs. 11.2 months for patients with chemotherapy only; P < 0.01). MM patients with an intermediate risk had a longer median OS when receiving novel agents (47.2 vs. 32.8 months).

Conclusion

Treatment with novel agents in MM resulted in a significant prolongation of OS. Benefit of therapy with novel agents was particularly evident for transplant-eligible patients and MM patients with unfavorable prognosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat UK Myeloma Forum. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2001;115(3):522–40.CrossRef UK Myeloma Forum. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2001;115(3):522–40.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Frelay J, Bray F, Sankila R, Parkin DM. EUCAN: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the European Union 1998, version 5.0. IARC Cancer Base No 4. Lyon: IARC Press; 1999. Frelay J, Bray F, Sankila R, Parkin DM. EUCAN: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the European Union 1998, version 5.0. IARC Cancer Base No 4. Lyon: IARC Press; 1999.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(1):21–33.CrossRefPubMed Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(1):21–33.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412–20. Erratum in J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6281. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412–20. Erratum in J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6281.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Meloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 1996;16(12):3832–42. Meloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: an overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 1996;16(12):3832–42.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(2):91–7.CrossRefPubMed Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(2):91–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al.: High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N engl J Med. 2003;348(19):1875–83.CrossRefPubMed Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al.: High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N engl J Med. 2003;348(19):1875–83.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractoy multiple myeloma. N Engl J med. 1999;341(21):1565–71.CrossRefPubMed Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractoy multiple myeloma. N Engl J med. 1999;341(21):1565–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, Fonseca R, Greipp PR. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):431–6.CrossRefPubMed Rajkumar SV, Blood E, Vesole D, Fonseca R, Greipp PR. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):431–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimopoulos MA, Spencer A, Attal M, et al. Multiple Myeloma (010) study investigators. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2123–32. Erratum in N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):544. Dimopoulos MA, Spencer A, Attal M, et al. Multiple Myeloma (010) study investigators. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2123–32. Erratum in N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):544.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, et al. Multiple Myeloma (009) study investigators. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North america. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2133–42.CrossRefPubMed Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, et al. Multiple Myeloma (009) study investigators. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North america. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2133–42.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase II study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory, myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2609–17.CrossRefPubMed Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase II study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory, myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2609–17.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, et al. Assessment of Proteasome Inhibitor for Extending Remission (APEX) Investigators. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2487–98.CrossRefPubMed Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, et al. Assessment of Proteasome Inhibitor for Extending Remission (APEX) Investigators. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(24):2487–98.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwig H, Avet-Loiseau H, Blade J, et al. European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies: update following recent congresses. Oncologist. 2012;17(5):592–606.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ludwig H, Avet-Loiseau H, Blade J, et al. European perspective on multiple myeloma treatment strategies: update following recent congresses. Oncologist. 2012;17(5):592–606.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111(5):2516–20.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111(5):2516–20.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Steward AK, Bergsagel PL, Greipp PR, et al. A practical guide to defining high-risk myeloma for clinical trials, patient counselling and choice of therapy. Leukemia. 2007;21(3):529–34.CrossRef Steward AK, Bergsagel PL, Greipp PR, et al. A practical guide to defining high-risk myeloma for clinical trials, patient counselling and choice of therapy. Leukemia. 2007;21(3):529–34.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat San-Miguel J, Mateos MV, Guiterrez NC. Risk stratification in the era of novel therapies. Cancer J. 2009;15(6):457–64.CrossRefPubMed San-Miguel J, Mateos MV, Guiterrez NC. Risk stratification in the era of novel therapies. Cancer J. 2009;15(6):457–64.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Intergroup Francophone du Myèlome Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99–06): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1209–18.CrossRefPubMed Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Intergroup Francophone du Myèlome Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99–06): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1209–18.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Belch A, Reece D, Bahlis NJ. Efficacy and safety of liposomal doxorubicin (DOXIL/CAELYX), bortezomib (Velcade) and dexamethasone in the treatment of previously untreated multiple myeloma patients: impact of cytogenetic profile. Haematologica. 2007;92:180a. Belch A, Reece D, Bahlis NJ. Efficacy and safety of liposomal doxorubicin (DOXIL/CAELYX), bortezomib (Velcade) and dexamethasone in the treatment of previously untreated multiple myeloma patients: impact of cytogenetic profile. Haematologica. 2007;92:180a.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Terpos E, Delimpasi S, Anargyrou K, et al. The combination of bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) is an effective regimen for high risk, newly diagnosed, patients with multiple myeloma, reduces bone resorption and normalizes angiopoietin-1 to angiopoietin-2 ratio. Blood. 2007;110(11):3596. Terpos E, Delimpasi S, Anargyrou K, et al. The combination of bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) is an effective regimen for high risk, newly diagnosed, patients with multiple myeloma, reduces bone resorption and normalizes angiopoietin-1 to angiopoietin-2 ratio. Blood. 2007;110(11):3596.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Palumbo A, Falco P, Corradini P, et al. GIMEMA-Italian Multiple Myeloma Network. Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed myeloma: a report from the GIMEMA-Italian Multiple Myeloma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2007;125(28):4459–65.CrossRef Palumbo A, Falco P, Corradini P, et al. GIMEMA-Italian Multiple Myeloma Network. Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed myeloma: a report from the GIMEMA-Italian Multiple Myeloma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2007;125(28):4459–65.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bahlis N, Song K, Trieu Y, et al. Lenalidomide overcomes poor prognosis conferred by del13q and t(4;14) but not del17p13 in multiple myeloma: results of the Canadian MM016 Trial. Blood. 2007;110 Abstract 3597. Bahlis N, Song K, Trieu Y, et al. Lenalidomide overcomes poor prognosis conferred by del13q and t(4;14) but not del17p13 in multiple myeloma: results of the Canadian MM016 Trial. Blood. 2007;110 Abstract 3597.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Libby E, Ebaid A, Quintana D, Wiggins C. Declining myeloma mortality rates in the united states following introduction of novel therapies. Haematologica. 2011;96(s1):Oral communication-14;32. Libby E, Ebaid A, Quintana D, Wiggins C. Declining myeloma mortality rates in the united states following introduction of novel therapies. Haematologica. 2011;96(s1):Oral communication-14;32.
Metadaten
Titel
Novel agents have a significant impact on survival of patients with multiple myeloma
verfasst von
Wolfgang Lamm
Sandra Eder
Marija Bojic
Christoph C. Zielinski
Johannes Drach, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift / Ausgabe 3-4/2015
Print ISSN: 0043-5325
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-014-0605-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2015

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 3-4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

mitteilungen der gesellschaft

Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft