Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Surgery 1/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Single-layer versus duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in pyloruspreserving pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma—an analysis of a single surgeon’s series

verfasst von: Dr. O. Gangl, U. Fröschl, R. M. Langer, R. Függer

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

Despite considerable efforts there is no consensus regarding the ideal reconstruction method for the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

Overall, 86 patients who underwent PD for ductal adenocarcinoma were selected for analysis. One surgeon (RF) took responsibility of all pancreatic resections, either by operating personally or proctoring the procedure. The database was prospectively maintained. End-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ; Group A) was performed from 01/01 to 10/07 and duct-to-mucosa PJ (Group B) from 10/07 to 12/12. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, incidence of pancreatic fistulas, and severe complications. Secondary endpoints were severity of pancreatic fistulas, incidence of unplanned reoperation and reintervention and length of stay (LOS).

Results

30-day mortality, pancreatic fistula, complication, unplanned reoperation and reintervention rates showed no significant differences (2.2 vs. 2.4 %; 6.7 vs. 0 %; 22.2 vs. 29.3 %; 6.7 vs. 0 %; 11.1 vs. 2.2 %). Summarizing unplanned reoperations and reinterventions, the necessity of any unplanned procedure revealed, a significant reduction from 8 (17.8 %) in Group A to 1 (2.2 %) in Group B (p = 0.02). Major complications (Dindo–Clavien Grades III–V) were decreased significantly in Group B (Group A: 9/45 (20 %) vs. Group A: 2/41 (4.9 %); p = 0.05). LOS was significantly shorter in Group B (15 days, +/− 6.01) as compared with Group A (18 days, +/− 8.87; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our data show superior outcomes with duct-to-mucosa PJ as compared with single-layer PJ.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AD, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AD, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gooiker GA, Lemmens VE, Besselink MG, et al. Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival. Br J Surg. 2014;101(8):1000–5.CrossRefPubMed Gooiker GA, Lemmens VE, Besselink MG, et al. Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival. Br J Surg. 2014;101(8):1000–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199–210.CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199–210.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, et al. Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy; incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg. 2009;197:702–9.CrossRefPubMed Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, et al. Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy; incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg. 2009;197:702–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-Cruz L, Belli A, Acosta M, et al. Which is the best technique for pancreaticoenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A critical analysis. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):761–6.CrossRefPubMed Fernández-Cruz L, Belli A, Acosta M, et al. Which is the best technique for pancreaticoenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A critical analysis. Surg Today. 2011;41(6):761–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, et al. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2005;189(6):720–9.CrossRefPubMed Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, et al. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2005;189(6):720–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003;134(5):766–71.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003;134(5):766–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, et al. Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(5):738–47.CrossRefPubMed Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, et al. Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(5):738–47.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Langrehr JM, Bahra M, Jacob D, et al. Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection. World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1111–19.CrossRefPubMed Langrehr JM, Bahra M, Jacob D, et al. Prospective randomized comparison between a new mattress technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreatic resection. World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1111–19.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen YS, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(6):477–81.PubMed Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen YS, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(6):477–81.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(1):87–91.CrossRefPubMed Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(1):87–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarr MG; The Pancreatic Surgery Group. The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:556–64.CrossRefPubMed Sarr MG; The Pancreatic Surgery Group. The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:556–64.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis CH, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis CH, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226(3):248–57.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226(3):248–57.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang SH, Dou KF, Sharma N, et al. The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2011;35:2290–7.CrossRefPubMed Yang SH, Dou KF, Sharma N, et al. The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2011;35:2290–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy EP, Yeo Ch. Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:769–74.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy EP, Yeo Ch. Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:769–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai X, Zhang Q, Noman M, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J. (2013);126(22):4340–47.PubMed Bai X, Zhang Q, Noman M, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J. (2013);126(22):4340–47.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gangl O, Fröschl U, Hofer W, et al. Unplanned reoperation and reintervention after pancreatic resections: an analysis of risk factors. World J Surg. 2011;35:2306–14.CrossRefPubMed Gangl O, Fröschl U, Hofer W, et al. Unplanned reoperation and reintervention after pancreatic resections: an analysis of risk factors. World J Surg. 2011;35:2306–14.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gangl O, Sahora K, Kornprat P, et al. Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections. World J Surg. 2014;38(2):456–62.CrossRefPubMed Gangl O, Sahora K, Kornprat P, et al. Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections. World J Surg. 2014;38(2):456–62.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wamser P, Stift A, Passler C, et al. How to pass on expertise: pancreatoduodenectomy at a teaching hospital. World J Surg. 2002;26(12):1458–62.CrossRefPubMed Wamser P, Stift A, Passler C, et al. How to pass on expertise: pancreatoduodenectomy at a teaching hospital. World J Surg. 2002;26(12):1458–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Single-layer versus duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in pyloruspreserving pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma—an analysis of a single surgeon’s series
verfasst von
Dr. O. Gangl
U. Fröschl
R. M. Langer
R. Függer
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0373-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

European Surgery 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe