nach oben

Spektrum der Augenheilkunde

Erschienen in:

01.12.2013 | originalarbeit

Virtuelle Realität und Simulation für die ophthalmochirurgische Ausbildung

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Dr. med. Dušica Pahor, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Spektrum der Augenheilkunde | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Zahlreiche Studien haben nachgewiesen, dass strukturiertes und betreutes ophthalmologisches Simulatortraining zur Verbesserung der ophthalmochirurgischen Ausbildung beiträgt und damit das Lernen beschleunigt. Um die Sicherheit der Patienten zu erhöhen, sollte man die Operationssimulatoren in die traditionelle Ausbildung einführen. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit versucht unser derzeitiges Wissen über ophthalmochirurgische Operationssimulatoren als Trainings- und Bewertungssystem in der ophthalmologischen Aus- und Weiterbildung zusammenzufassen.

Vorheriger Artikel Augenheilkunde in Graz

Nächster Artikel Phakic intraocular lenses: past and present

Koch F, Koss MJ, Naser H. Virtuelle Realität in der Ophthalmologie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2009;226:672–6.PubMedCrossRef

Oetting TA. Surgical competency in residents. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:56–60.PubMedCrossRef

Waqar S, Williams O, Park J, et al. Can virtual reality simulation help to determine the importance of stereopsis in intraocular surgery? Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:742–6.PubMedCrossRef

Sachdeva R, Traboulsi EI. Performance of patients wth deficient stereoacuity on the EYESi microsurgical simulator. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:427–33.PubMedCrossRef

Feudner EM, Engel C, Neuhann IM, et al. Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(7):955–63.PubMedCrossRef

Spiteri A, Aggarwal R, Kersey T, et al. Phacoemuilsification skills training and assessment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(5):536–41.PubMedCrossRef

Selvander M, Asman P. Stereoacuity and intraocular surgical sill: effect of stereoacuity level on virtual reality intraocular surgical performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(12):2188–93.PubMedCrossRef

Park J, Waqar S, Kersey T, et al. Effect of distraction on simulated anterior segment surgical performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(8):1517–22.PubMedCrossRef

Podbielski DW, Noble J, Gill HS, et al. A comparision of hand- and foot-activated surgical tools in simulated ophthalmic surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012;47(5):414–7.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Selvander M, Aman P. Virtual reality cataract surgery training: learning curves and concurrent validity. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(5):412–7.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Selvander M, Asman P. Cataract surgeons outperform medical students in Eyesi virtual reality cataract surgery: evidence for contruct validity. Acta ophthalmol. 2013;91(5):469–74.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Saleh GM, Theodoraki K, Gillan S, et al. The development of a virtual reality training programme for ophthalmology: repeatability and reproducibility (part of the International Forum for Ophthalmic Simulation Studies). Eye 2013 Aug 23. doi:10.1038/eye.2013.166.

13.

Lam CK, Sundaraj K, Sulaiman MN. A systemic review of phacoemulsification cataract surgery in virtual reality simulators. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013;49(1):1–8.

14.

Baxter JM, Lee R, Sharp JAH, et al. Intensive cataract training: a novel approach. Eye. 2013;27:742–6.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Saleh GM, Lamparter J, O’Sullivan F, et al. The international forum of ophthalmic simulation: developing a virtual reality training curriculum for ophthalmology. Br J ophthalmol. 2013;97:789–92.

16.

Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, et al. An evidence-based virtual training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg. 2006;244:310–4.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Cha JM, Lee JI, Joo KR, et al. The box simulator isuseful for training novice endoscopists in basic endoscopic techniques. Yonsei Med J. 2012;53(2):304–9.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Giannotti D, Patrizi G, Di Rocco G, et al. Play to become a surgeon: impact of Nintendo WII training on laparoscopic skills. PloS ONE. 2013;8(2):e57372.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Weiss M, Lauer SA, Fried MP, et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery simulator as a training tool for ophthalmology residents. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(6):460–4.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Von Wensky MW V, Raptis DA, et al. Basic laparascopic training using the Simbionix LAP Mentor: setting the standards in the novice group. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(4):459–67.CrossRef

21.

Fried MP, Satava R, Weghorst, et al. The use of surgical simulators to reduce errors. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin ES, editors. Advances in patients safety: from research to implementation (Volume 4: programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare research and quality (US);2005.

22.

Project ACGME: http://www.ecgme.org/outcome/-learn/introduction/SBP.html. Accessed 10. Oct. 2007.

23.

Mc Donnell PJ K, Brinton GS, et al. Perceptions of recents ophtahlmology residency graduates regarding preparation for practice. Ophthalmol. 2007;114:387–91.CrossRef

24.

Wagner C, Schill M, Männer R. Intraocular surgery on a virtual eye. Commun ACM. 2002;45(7):45–9.CrossRef

25.

Bridges M, Diamond DL. The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in th eoperating room. Am J Surg. 1999;177:28–32.PubMedCrossRef

26.

VRMagic. EYESi Ophthalmic surgery simulator user guide. Mannheim: VRMagic; 2006:S. 58–9.

27.

Euliano T. Small group teaching: clinical correlation with a human patient simulator. Adv Physiol Educ. 2001;25(1–4):36–43.PubMed

28.

Wong AK. Full scale computer simulators in anesthesia training and evaluation. Can J Anesth. 2004;51(5):455–64.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Khalifa YM, Bogorad D, Gibson V, et al. Virtual reality in ophthalmology training. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51(3):259–73.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Solverson DJ, Mazzoli RA, Raymond WR, et al. Vitual reality simualtion in acquiring and differentiating basic ophthalmic microsurgical skills. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(2):98–103.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Chakrabarti M, John SR, Chakrabarti A. The EYESi. ophthalmic surgical simulator. Retinoblastoma. 2009;21(3):280–4.

32.

Erie EA, Mahr MA, Hodge DO, et al. Effect of sleep deprivation on the performance of simulated anterior segment surgical skill. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46(1):61–5.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Le EDB, Adatia FA, Lam WC. Vitual reality ophthalmic surgical simulation as a feasible training and assessment tool: results of a multicentre study. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46(1):56–60.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, et al. The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(9):1215–9.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Dooley IJ, O’Brie PD. Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(4):604–8.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Rogers GM, Oetting TA, Lee AG, et al. Impact of a structured surgical curriculum on ophthalmic resident cataract complication rates. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(11):1956–60.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Windsor JA, Diener S, Zoha F. Learning style and laparoscopic eyperience in psychomotor skill performance using a virtual reality surgical simulator. Am J Surg. 2008;195:837–42.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Lucas SM, Zeltser IS, Bensalah K, et al. Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure. J Urol. 2008;180:2588–91.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Tsang JS, Naughton PA, Leong S, et al. Vitual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training. Surgeon. 2008;6:214–20.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Rossi JVVD, Fujii GY, Lakhanpal RR, et al. Virtual vitroretinal surgical simulator as a training tool. Retina. 2004;24:231–6.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Haque SSS. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators as a training tool. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006;10–51.

Titel: Virtuelle Realität und Simulation für die ophthalmochirurgische Ausbildung
verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Dr. med. Dušica Pahor, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: Spektrum der Augenheilkunde / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-4282
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7523
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-013-0193-2

Springer Medizin Österreich

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Visusprognose nach Gamma Knife Radiochirurgie von Aderhautmelanomen

Editorial

PROCHORN – Prospektives Register von Patientinnen mit Aderhautnävi

Gender differences in open globe injuries in children

Die Häufigkeit der Meibom-Drüsen-Dysfunktion bei PatientInnen mit Beschwerden des Trockenen Auges in einer klinischen Population

Festtagung 150 Jahre Universitäts-Augenklinik Graz