nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.04.2013 | Original Article

For how many times can a partially absorbable monofilament mesh be sterilized? In vitro experimental study

verfasst von: O. V. Ozkan, MD, A. Aydogan, MD, S. Akkucuk, MD, M. Aydin, MD, E. Nacar, B. Ozer, S. Mistikoglu, I. Yetim, MD, A. Gokce, MD

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

We investigated the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma resterilization (HPS) on partially absorbable monofilament meshes in terms of their mechanical properties and risk of infection.

Methods

A mesh was divided into small pieces which were categorized as HPS-1, HPS-2 and HPS-3 according to the number of HPS. To assess the strength of specimens, maximum load, elongation at maximum load and quantity of energy required for complete failure of the specimens were measured. Microbiological and ultrastructural analyses were also performed.

Results

There was not a significant relationship between control and HPS-1, HPS-2 groups in terms of maximum load and quantity of energy required for complete failure of the specimens. However, those parameters were statistically different between HPS-3 and control groups. We observed minor morphological changes in the HPS-3 group when compared to those of the control group. No risk of infection was detected by microbiological tests.

Conclusion

It is advisable to apply HPS to partially absorbable monofilament meshes no more than twice since sterilization for three times leads to degeneration in mesh structure and strength.

Vorheriger Artikel Clinico-pathological findings in stage-I primary spontaneous pneumothorax: analysis of 19 cases and literature review

Nächster Artikel Impact of resection techniques on postoperative lung function parameters in pulmonary metastasectomy

Collaboration EH. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg. 2000;87:854–9.CrossRef

Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362:1561–71.CrossRefPubMed

Muller MAR, Osbahr DC, Murrell GA. Meshes in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study (TECHNIQUE). Tech shoulder elbow surg. 2003;4:50–4.CrossRef

Bellon JM, Rodriguez M, Garcia-Honduvilla N, Pascual G, Bujan J. Partially absorbable meshes for hernia repair offer advantages over nonabsorbable meshes. Am J Surg. 2007;194:68–74.CrossRefPubMed

Langer C, Neufang T, Kley C, Liersch T, Becker H. Central mesh recurrence after incisional hernia repair with Marlex-are the meshes strong enough? Hernia. 2001;5:164–7.CrossRefPubMed

Coda A, Bendavid R, Botto-Micca F, Bossotti M, Bona A. Structural alterations of prosthetic meshes in humans. Hernia. 2003;7:29–34.PubMed

Serbetci K, Kulacoglu H, Devay AO, Hasirci N. Effects of resterilization on mechanical properties of polypropylene meshes. Am J Surg. 2007;194:375–9.CrossRefPubMed

Nagaraja PA, Shetty D. Effect of re-sterilization of surgical sutures by ethylene oxide. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:80–3.CrossRefPubMed

Cobb WS, Kercher KW. Heniford BT The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2005;12:63–9.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bellon JM, Bujan J, Contreras L, Hernando A. Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of scar formation and macrophage response. Biomaterials. 1995;16:381–7.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Akolekar D, Kumar S, Khan LR, de Beaux AC, Nixon SJ. Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia. 2008;12:39–43.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC. Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:242–7.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Junge K, Rosch R, Krones CJ, Klinge U, Mertens PR, Lynen P, et al. Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. Hernia. 2005;9:212–7.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Holzheimer RG. First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure-quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF- 36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients. Eur J Med Res. 2004;9:323–7.PubMed

15.

O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92:166–70.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Radford R. Reprocessing single-use devices: choosing a thirdparty reprocessor for a given single-use device. Infect Control Today. 2001;5:27–9.

17.

Cingi A, Manukyan MN, Gulluoglu BM, Barlas A, Yegen C, Yalin R, et al. Use of resterilized polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized study. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:834–40.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Broll R, Bethge T, Windhövel U, Schwandner O, Markert U, Bruch HP, et al. Influence of resterilized polypropylen meshes on growth of human fibroblasts: an experimental in vitro study. Zentralbl Chir. 2002;127:589–93.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sucullu I, Akin ML, Yitgin S, Filiz AI, Kurt Y. Resterilized mesh in repair of abdominal wall defects in rats. J Invest Surg. 2008;21:171–6.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Boscariol MR, Moreira AJ, Mansano RD, Kikuchi IS, Pinto TJ. Sterilization by pure oxygen plasma and by oxygen-hydrogen peroxide plasma: an efficacy study. Int J Pharm. 2008;353:170–5.PubMed

21.

Bathina MN, Mickelsen S, Brooks C, Jaramillo J, Hepton T, Kusumoto FM. Safety and efficacy of hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization for repeated use of electrophysiology catheters. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1384–8.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Dora CD, Dimarco DS, Zobitz ME, Elliott DS. Time dependent variations in biomechanical properties of cadaveric fascia, porcine dermis, porcine small intestine submucosa, polypropylene mesh and autologous fascia in the rabbit model: implications for sling surgery. J Urol. 2004;171:1970–3.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Pernier C, Grosgogeat B, Ponsonnet L, Benay G, Lissac M. Influence of autoclave sterilization on the surface parameters and mechanical properties of six orthodontic wires. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:72–81.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Rutala WA, Weber DJ. New disinfection and sterilization methods. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:348–53.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rutala WA, Gergen MF, Weber DJ. Comparative evaluation of the sporicidal activity of new low-temperature sterilization technologies: ethylene oxide, 2 plasma sterilization systems, and liquid peracetic acid. Am J Infect Control. 1998;6:393–8.CrossRef

26.

Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Clinical effectiveness of low-temperature sterilization technologies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19:798–804.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Rutala WA, Gergen MF, Weber DJ. Sporicidal activity of a new low-temperature sterilization technology: the Sterrad 50 sterilizer. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:514–6.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: For how many times can a partially absorbable monofilament mesh be sterilized? In vitro experimental study
verfasst von: O. V. Ozkan, MD
A. Aydogan, MD
S. Akkucuk, MD
M. Aydin, MD
E. Nacar
B. Ozer
S. Mistikoglu
I. Yetim, MD
A. Gokce, MD
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2013
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: European Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-012-0177-5

Springer Medizin Österreich

Summary

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

When to repair ischemic mitral valve regurgitation? An algorithmic approach

Approach to the upper body after massive weight loss

Complications in body-contouring procedures with special regard to massive weight loss patients: personal observations

Examining and choosing patients for body contouring after massive weight loss

Selected commentary to “Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease”

Impact of resection techniques on postoperative lung function parameters in pulmonary metastasectomy